A detailed comparative analysis on the overall codon usage patterns in West Nile virus

Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 396-400

  Moratorio, Gonzalo ^a,b   Iriarte, Andrés ^a   Moreno, Pilar ^a,b   Musto, Héctor ^a   Cristina, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR DE MONTEVIDEO   (Uruguay)

Author keywords

Codon usage; Evolution; West Nile virus

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRD; CODON USAGE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE SEQUENCE; HORSE; MOSQUITO; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; VIRUS GENE; VIRUS ISOLATION; VIRUS STRAIN; WEST NILE FLAVIVIRUS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; WEST NILE VIRUS;

EID: 84873591262     PISSN: 15671348     EISSN: 15677257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ahn I., et al. Genomic analysis of Influenza a viruses, including Avian Flu (H5N1) strains. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 21:511-519.
2. Bisbal C., Silverman R.H. Diverse functions of RNase L and implications in pathology. Biochimie 2007, 89:789-798.
3. Brackney D.E., et al. West Nile virus genetic diversity is maintained during transmission by Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24466.
4. Calisher C.H., et al. Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J. Gen. Virol. 1989, 70:37.
5. Ciota A.T., et al. Role of the mutant spectrum in adaptation and replication of West Nile virus. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88:865-874.
6. Ciota A.T., et al. Quantification of intrahost bottlenecks of West Nile virus in Culex pipiens mosquitoes using an artificial mutant swarm. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012, 12(3):557-564.
7. Dearforff E.R., Fitzpatrick K.A., Jerzak G.V.S., Shi P.Y., Kramer L.D., Ebel G.D. West Nile virus experimental evolution in vivo and the trade-off hypothesis. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7:e1002335.
8. Dauphin G., et al. West Nile: wordwide current situation in animals and humans. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 27:343-355.
9. Domingo E., et al. Quasispecies and RNA virus evolution: principles and consequences 2001, Asutin, Landes Bioscience.
10. Dorn A., Kippenberger S. Clinical application of CpG-, non-CpG, and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides as immunomodulators. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2008, 10:10-20.
11. D'Andrea L., et al. A detailed comparative analysis on the overall codon usage patterns in hepatitis A virus. Virus Res. 2011, 157:19-24.
12. Gingold H., Pilpel Y. Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:481.
13. Greenacre M. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis 1984, Academic Press, London.
14. Hamer G.L., et al. Host selection by Culex pipiens mosquitoes and West Nile Virus amplification. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 80:268-278.
15. Hu J.S., et al. The characteristic of codon usage pattern and its evolution of hepatitis C virus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11:2098-2102.
16. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 158:73-597.
17. Liu X.S., et al. Patterns and influencing factions of synonymous codon usage in porcine circovirus. Virol. J. 2012, 9:68.
18. Liu W.Q., et al. Compare the differences of synonymous codon usage between the two species within cardiovirus. Virology J. 2011, 8:325.
19. Jerzak G.V., et al. The West Nile virus mutant spectrum is host-dependant and a determinant of mortality in mice. Virology 2007, 360:469-476.
20. Jia R., et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in the UL24 gene of duck enteritis virus. Virus Genes 2009, 38:96-103.
21. Komar N., et al. Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9:311-322.
22. Komar N., Clark G.G. West Nile activity in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2006, 19:112-117.
23. Supek F., Vlahovicek K. INCA: synonymous codon usage analysis and clustering by means of self-organizing map. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:2329-2330.
24. Lim S.M., et al. West Nile Virus: immunity and pathogenesis. Viruses 2011, 3:811-828.
25. Lobo F.P., et al. Virus-host coevolution: common patterns of nucleotide motif usage in Flaviviridae and their hosts. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6282.
26. May F.J., et al. Phylogeography of West Nile Virus: from the cradle of evolution in Africa to Eurasia, Australia and the Americas. J. Virol. 2011, 85:2964-2974.
27. Novembre J.A. Accounting for background nucleotide composition when measuring codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19:1390-1394.
28. Pandit A., Sinha S. Differential trends in the codon usage patterns in HIV-1 genes. PLoS One 2011, 6:28889.
29. Pesko K.N., Ebel G.D. West Nile virus population genetics and evolution. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012, 12:181-190.
30. Player M.R., Torrence P.F. The 2-5A system: modulation of viral and cellular processes through acceleration of RNA degradation. Pharmacol. Ther. 1998, 78:55-113.
31. Puigbo P., Bravo I.G., Garcia-Vallve S. CAIcal: a combined set of tools to assess codon usage adaptation. Biology Direct 2008, 3:e38.
32. Puigbo P., Bravo I.G., Garcia-Vallve S. E-CAI: a novel server to estimated an expected value of Codon Adaptation Index (eCAI). BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:e65.
33. Roosendaal J., et al. Regulated cleavages at the West Nile virus NS4A-2K-NS4B junctionsplay a major role in rearranging cytoplasmic membranes and Golgi trafficking of the NS4A protein. J. Virol. 2006, 80:4623-4632.
34. Scherbik S.V., et al. RNase L plays a role in the antiviral response to West Nile virus. J. Virol 2006, 80:2987-2999.
35. Shackelton L.A., Parrish C.R., Holmes E.C. Evolutionary basis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in vertebrate DNA viruses. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 62:551-563.
36. Sharp P.M., Li W.H. The codon adaptation index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15:1281-1295.
37. Sharp P.M., Li W.H. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J. Mol. Evol. 1986, 24:28-38.
38. Stoletzki N., Eyre-Walker A. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:374-381.
39. Tao P., et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in classical swine fever virus. Virus Genes 2009, 38:104-112.
40. Ulbert S. West Nile Virus: the complex biology of an emerging pathogen. Intervirology 2011, 54:171-184.
41. Wessa, P., 2012. Free Statistics Software, Office for Research Development and Education, version 1.1.23-r7. URL: http://www.wessa.net.
42. Wong E., et al. Codon usage bias and the evolution of Influenza A viruses. Codon usage biases of Influenza virus. Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:253.
43. Woo P.C.Y., et al. Cytosine deamination and selection of CpG suppressed clones are the two major independent biological forces that shape codon usage bias in Coronaviruses. Virology 2007, 369:431-442.
44. Zhao S., et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in 11 Human Bocavirus isolates. Biosystems 2008, 92:207-214.
45. Zhong J., et al. Mutation pressures shapes codon usage in the GC-Rich genome of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Genes 2007, 35:767-776.
46. Zhou J.H., et al. Comparative the codon usage between the three main virases in pestivirus genus and susceptible livestock. Virus Genes 2012, 44:475-481.
47. Zhou T., et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in H5N1 virus and other Influenza A viruses. Biosystems 2005, 81:77-86.