Social comparisons and reference group formation: Some experimental evidence

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 75-89

  McDonald, Ian M ^a   Nikiforakis, Nikos ^a,b,c   Olekalns, Nilss ^a   Sibly, Hugh ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cognitive dissonance; Laboratory experiments; Real effort; Social comparisons; Ultimatum bargaining

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873548266     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: 10902473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2012.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abel A.B. Asset prices under habit formation and catching up with the Joneses. Amer. Econ. Rev. 1990, 80(2):38-42.
2. Babcock L., Loewenstein G. Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econ. Perspect. 1997, 11(1):109-126.
3. Babcock L., Wang X., Loewenstein G. Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econ. 1996, 111(1):1-19.
4. Bhaskar V. Wage relativities and the natural range of unemployment. Econ. J. 1990, 100(400):60-66.
5. Bohnet I., Zeckhauser R. Social comparisons in the ultimatum game. Scand. J. Econ. 2004, 106(3):495-510.
6. Camerer C.F. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction 2003, Russell Sage, New York.
7. Cason T.N., Mui V.-L. Social influence in the sequential dictator game. J. Math. Psych. 1998, 42:248-265.
8. Chen Y., Li S.X. Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99(1):431-457.
9. Clark A., Frijters P., Shields M.A. Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J. Econ. Lit. 2008, XLVI:95-144.
10. Cooper, D.J. Kagel, J.H., forthcoming. Other regarding preferences: A survey of experimental results. In: Kagel, J., Roth, A. (Eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Cooper R., DeJong D.V., Forsythe R., Ross T.W. Forward induction in the battle-of-the-sexes game. Amer. Econ. Rev. 1993, 83(5):1303-1316.
12. Erkal N., Gangadharan L., Nikiforakis N. Relative earnings and giving in a real-effort experiment. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101(7):3330-3348.
13. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econ. 1999, 114(3):817-868.
14. Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism-Experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity 2006, vol. 1. Elsevier.
15. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relat. 1954, 7:117-140.
16. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance 1957, Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL.
17. Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exper. Econ. 2007, 10(2):171-178.
18. Frank R.H. Are workers paid their marginal products?. Amer. Econ. Rev. 1984, 74(4):549-571.
19. Frank R.H. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status 1985, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
20. Frey B.S., Meier S. Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing "conditional cooperation" in a field experiment. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2004, 94(5):1717-1722.
21. Greiner, B., 2004. The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0-A guide for the organization of experiments in economics. Working Paper Series in Economics 10, University of Cologne.
22. Gueth W., van Damme E. Information, strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining: An experimental study. J. Math. Psych. 1998, 42:227-247.
23. Kagel J.H., Wolfe K.W. Tests of fairness models based on equity considerations in a three-person ultimatum game. Exper. Econ. 2001, 4(3):203-219.
24. Knez M.C., Camerer C.F. Outside options and social comparisons in three player ultimatum game experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 1995, 10(1):65-94.
25. Konow J. Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2000, 90(4):1072-1091.
26. Lye J.N., McDonald I.M., Sibly H. An estimate of the range of equilibrium rates of unemployment for Australia. Econ. Rec. 2001, 77(236):35-50.
27. McLeish, K.N., Oxoby, R.J., 2007. Identity, cooperation, and punishment. IZA Discussion Paper Series No. 2572.
28. Neumark D., Postlewaite A. Relative income concerns and the rise in married women's employment. J. Public Econ. 1998, 70(1):157-183.
29. Olson J.M., Herman C.P., Zanna M.P. Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 4 1986, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Oxoby R.J. Attitudes and allocations: Status, cognitive dissonance, and the manipulation of attitudes. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2003, 52:365-385.
31. Rabin M. Cognitive dissonance and social change. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1994, 23(2):177-194.
32. Shupp R., Schmitt P., Swoope K. On the role of the hostage in ultimatum bargaining games. J. Socio-Econ. 2006, 35(3):399-411.
33. Stark O., Taylor J.E. Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. Econ. J. 1991, 101(408):1163-1178.
34. Straub P. Risk dominance and coordination failure in static games. Quart. Rev. Econ. Finance 1995, 35:339-365.
35. Tajfel H., Turner J. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. The Psychology of Intergroup Relations 1986, 7-24. Nelson-Hall, Chicago. S. Worchel, W. Austin (Eds.).
36. Torgler B., Schmidt S.L. What shapes player performance in soccer? Empirical findings from a panel analysis. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39(18):2355-2369.