Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 227-247

  Güth, Werner ^a   Van Damme, Eric ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347249304     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1212     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bolton G. E., Ockenfels A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Working paper. 1997;Penn State University.
2. Bolton G. E., Zwick R. Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior. 10:1995;95-121.
3. Bolton G. E., Katok E., Zwick R. Dictator game giving: rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. 1994;Penn State University.
4. Bolton G. E. A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review. 81:1991;1096-1136.
5. Camerer C., Thaler R. H. Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners. J. Economic Perspectives. 9:1995;209-219.
6. Forsythe R., Horowitz J. L., Savin N. E., Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior. 6:1994;347-369.
7. Güth W. On ultimatum bargaining experiments - A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation. 1995;329-344.
8. Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation. 1982;367-388.
9. Güth W., van Damme E. Information, strategic behavior and fairness in ultimatum bargaining. CentER Discussion Paper No. 9465. 1994.
10. Harrison G. W., McCabe K. A. Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment. International Journal of Game Theory. 25:1996;303-327.
11. Hoffman E., McCabe K. A., Shachat K., Smith V. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior. 7:1994;346-380.
12. Hoffman E., McCabe K. A., Smith V. L. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review. 86:1996;653-660.
13. Kagel J., Kim C., Moser D. Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior. 13:1992;100-110.
14. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business. 59:1986;285-300.
15. Mitzkewitz M., Nagel R. Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory. 22:1993;171-198.
16. Ochs J., Roth A. E. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. American Economic Review. 79:1989;355-384.
17. Prasnikar V., Roth A. E. Considerations of fairness and strategy: Experimental data from sequential games. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 104:1989;865-888.
18. Rapoport A., Sundali J. A. Ultimatums in two-person bargaining with one-sided uncertainty: offer game. International Journal of Game Theory. 25:1996;475-494.
19. Roth A. E. Bargaining experiments. Handbook of Experimental Economics. 1995;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
20. Selten R. Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. Sauermann H. Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. 1967;136-168.