Flight simulator motion literature pertinent to airline-pilot recurrent training and evaluation

AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 187-203

  Bürki Cohen, Judith ^a   Sparko, Andrea L ^a   Bellman, Miles ^a  

^a VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); TRAINING AIRCRAFT;

CURRENT REGULATIONS; FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN PERCEPTION SYSTEMS; MOTION SIMULATIONS; MOTION STIMULATIONS; SIMULATOR TRAINING; SIX DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM; TRANSFER OF TRAININGS;

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

EID: 84873465888     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6320     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Caro, P. W., The Relationship between Flight Simulator Motion and Training Requirements, Human Factors, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1979, pp. 493-501.
2. Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., Zikovitz, D., Redlick, F., Jaekl, P., Jasiobedzka, U., Jenkin, H., and Allison, R. S., Simulating Self Motion I: Cues for the Perception of Motion, Virtual Reality, Vol. 6, 2001, pp. 75-85.
3. Levison, W. H., and Junker, A. M., A Model for the Pilot's Use of Motion Cues in Steady-State Roll-Axis Tracking Tasks, AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 1978.
4. Hall, J. R., The Need for Platform Motion in Modern Piloted Flight Training Simulators, Royal Aerospace Establishment, Tech Memo FM 35, Bedford, UK, 1989.
5. Gundry, J., Man and Motion Cues, Third Flight Simulation Symposium, Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS), 1976.
6. Hosman, R. J. A. W., and Van der Vaart, J. C., Effects of Vestibular and Visual Motion Perception on Task Performance, Acta Psychologica, No. 48, 1981, pp. 271-287.
7. St George, R. J., and Fitzpatrick, R. C., The Sense of Self-Motion, Orientation and Balance Explored by Vestibular Stimulation, Journal of Physiology, Vol. 589, No. 4, 2011, pp. 807-813.
8. White, A. D., and Rodchenko, V. V., Motion Fidelity Criteria Based on Human Perception and Performance, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 1999.
9. U.S. Air Force, Air Force Manual 11-217: Instrument Flight Procedures. 2000.
10. Boeing, Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: Worldwide Operations 1959-2010. 2011, Aviation Safety, Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
11. Civil Aviation Authority, Safety Regulation Group Safety Plan, CAA, West Sussex, U.K., 2006.
12. Advani, S. K., Schroeder, J.A., and Burks, B., What Really Can Be Done in Simulation to Improve Upset Training, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2010.
13. Bürki-Cohen, J., Technical Challenges of Upset Recovery Training: Simulating the Element of Surprise, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2010.
14. Bürki-Cohen, J., and Sparko, A. L., Airplane Upset Prevention Research Needs, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2008.
15. Boeing, Airbus, and Flight Safety International (FSI), Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid Revision 2, edited by C. D. Carbaugh, C. L. Rockliff, and B. Vandel, 2008.
16. Bürki-Cohen, J., Evidence for the Need of Realistic Radio Communications for Airline Pilot Simulator Training and Evaluation, International Conference Simulation of the Environment, Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS), 2003.
17. Davies, D. P., Approval of Flight Simulator Flying Qualities, The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 79, No. 775, 1975, pp. 281-297.
18. Young, L. R., Dichgans, J., Murphy, R., and Brandt, T., Interaction of Optokinetic and Vestibular Stimuli in Motion Perception, Acta Otolaryng, Vol. 76, 1973, pp. 24-31.
19. Riecke, B. E., Västfjäll, D., Larsson, P., and Schulte-Pelkum, J., Top-Down and Multi-Modal Influences on Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Reality, 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality, of the 11th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (HCI International), 2005.
20. Riecke, B., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., and Bülthoff, H., Spatialized Auditory Cues Enhance the Visually-Induced Self-Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Technical Report No. 138, Tübingen, Germany, 2005.
21. Rolfe, J. M., and Staples, K. J. (eds.), Flight Simulation, Cambridge Aerospace Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.
22. Bürki-Cohen, J., Transcript of the Joint FAA/Industry Symposium on Level B Airplane Simulator Motion Requirements, FAA, 1996.
23. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Commuter Operations and General Certification and Operations Requirements in Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Parts 91, 119, 121, 125, 127, and 135. 1995.
24. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Manual of Criteria for the Qualification of Flight Simulators, Revision 3, ICAO, 9625-AN/938, Montreal, 2009.
25. Strachan, I., Rationalizing the Regs - RAeS Plays Pivotal Role in Sim Training, Journal for Civil Aviation Training (CAT), 2008, pp. 22-24.
26. Bigarré, J., and Dranfield, M., Continuous Pilot Training, Urgencies and Realities - What Are We Waiting For?, ICAO Next Generation of Aviation Professionals Symposium, ICAO, 2010.
27. Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Safety Committee Statement of Position: The Need for Motion in Flight Simulation. 2007.
28. Hall, J. R., Motion versus Visual Cues in Piloted Flight Simulation, Flight Mechanics Panel Specialists' Meeting on Piloted Aircraft Environment Simulation Techniques, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD), 1978.
29. Reid, L. D., and Nahon, M. A., Response of Airline Pilots to Variations in Flight Simulator Motion Algorithms, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 25, No. 7, 1988, pp. 639-646.
30. Bussolari, S. R., and Lee, A. T., The Effects of Flight Simulator Motion on Pilot Performance and Simulator Acceptability in Transport Category Aircraft, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/NASA Ames Research Center, 1986.
31. Bürki-Cohen, J., and Go, T. H., The Effect of Simulator Motion Cues on Initial Training of Airline Pilots, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2005.
32. Go, T. H., Bürki-Cohen, J., Chung, W. W., Schroeder, J., Saillant, G., Jacobs, S., and Longridge, T., The Effects of Enhanced Hexapod Motion on Airline Pilot Recurrent Training and Evaluation, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2003.
33. Go, T. H., Bürki-Cohen, J., and Soja, N. N., The Effect of Simulator Motion on Pilot Vehicle Training and Evaluation, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2000.
34. Bürki-Cohen, J., Go, T. H., Chung, W. W., and Schroeder, J., Simulator Platform Motion Requirements for Recurrent Airline Pilot Training and Evaluation, 2004.
35. Sinacori, J. B., The Determination of Some Requirements for a Helicopter Flight Research Simulation Facility, NASA Ames Research Center, 1097-1, Moffett Field, CA, 1977.
36. Schroeder, J. A., Helicopter Flight Simulation Motion Platform Requirements, NASA/TP-1999-208766, 1999.
37. Mikula, J., Chung, W. W. Y., and Tran, D., Motion Fidelity Criteria for Roll-Lateral Translational Tasks, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 1999.
38. Advani, S. K., Hosman, R. J. A. W., and Potter, M., Objective Motion Fidelity Qualification in Flight Training Simulators, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
39. Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A., Bruna, O., Canavan, T., Della Sala, S., Green, R., Laaksonen, R., Lorenzi, L., and Taussik, I., A Comparison of 'Errorless' and 'Trial-and-Error' Learning Methods for Teaching Individuals with Acquired Memory Deficits, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2000, pp. 67-101.
40. Regional Airline Association (RAA), Government Research Indicates Simulator Motion Adds Training Complexity - RAA Recommends Operational Testing to Validate Effectiveness of Non-Motion Platforms, Regional Airline Industry White Paper, 2008.
41. Bürki-Cohen, J., Soja, N. N., and Longridge, T., Simulator Platform Motion--the Need Revisited, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1998, pp. 293-317.
42. Delft University of Technology, A Cybernetic Approach to Assess Simulator Fidelity, URL: http://www.lr.tudelft.nl/en/organisation/departments-and-chairs/control-and-operations/control-and-simulation/backup/onderzoek/human-machine-systems-and-flight-simulation/cybernetic-approach-to-asses-simulator-fidelity/ [cited July 12, 2011].
43. Steurs, M., Mulder, M., and van Paassen, R. M. M., A Cybernetic Approach to Assess Flight Simulator Fidelity, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2004.
44. Zaal, P. M. T., Pool, D. M., Mulder, M., and Van Paassen, M. M., Multimodal Pilot Control Behavior in Combined Target-Following Disturbance-Rejection Tasks, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2009.
45. Nieuwenhuizen, F. M., Zaal, P. M. T., Mulder, M., and Van Paassen, M. M., A New Multi-Channel Pilot Model Identification Method for Use in Assessment of Simulator Fidelity, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2006.
46. Pool, D. M., Zaal, P. M. T., Van Paassen, M. M., and Mulder, M., Identification of Multimodal Pilot Models Using Ramp Target and Multisine Disturbance Signals, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011.
47. van den Berg, P., Zaal, P. M. T., Mulder, M., and Van Paassen, M. M., Conducting Multi-Modal Pilot Model Identification - Results of a Simulator Experiment, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
48. Smaili, H., Jansen, H., Naseri, A., Groen, E. L., and Stroosma, O., Pilot Motion Perception and Control During a Simulated Decrab Maneuver, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
49. Groen, E. L., Smaili, M. H., and Hosman, R. J. A. W., Simulated Decrab Maneuver: Evaluation with a Pilot Perception Model, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2005.
50. Groen, E. L., Hosman, R. J. A. W., and Dominicus, J. W., Motion Fidelity During a Simulated Takeoff, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2003.
51. Nieuwenhuizen, F. M., Beykirch, K. A., Mulder, M., and Bülthoff, H. H., Identification of Pilot Control Behavior in a Roll-Lateral Helicopter Hover Task, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
52. Berger, D. R., Terzibas, C., Beykirch, K., and Bülthoff, H. H., The Role of Visual Cues and Whole-Body Rotation in Helicopter Hovering Control, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
53. Beykirch, K., Nieuwenhuizen, F. M., Teufel, H. J., Nusseck, H.-G., Butler, J. S., and Bülthoff, H. H., Control of a Lateral Helicopter Side-Step Maneuver in an Anthropomorphic Robot, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
54. Grant, P. R., Yam, B., Hosman, R., and Schroeder, J. A., Effect of Simulator Motion on Pilot Behavior and Perception, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2006.
55. Ellerbroek, J., Stroosma, O., Mulder, M., and van Paassen, M. M., Identification of the Roles of Yaw and Sway Motion in Helicopter Yaw Control Tasks, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2007.
56. Vaden, E. A., and Hall, S., The Effect of Simulator Platform Motion on Pilot Training Transfer: A Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2005, pp. 375-393.
57. van der Pal, J., The Effect of Simulator Motion on Parameter Training for F-16 Pilots, Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Transportation Systems, Medical Ergonomics and Training, edited by D. Harris, Ashgate, Oxford, England, 1999, pp. 267-275.
58. De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., and Mulder, M., Training Effectiveness of Whole Body Flight Simulator Motion: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, in press.
59. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2 ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988, pp. 1-552.
60. Sparko, A. L., Bürki-Cohen, J., and Go, T. H., "Transfer of Training from a Full-Flight Simulator vs. a High Level Flight Training Device with a Dynamic Seat, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, AIAA, 2010.
61. Young, L. R., "Some Effects of Motion Cues on Manual Tracking," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 4, No. 10, 1967, pp. 1300-1303.