The effects of enhanced hexapod motion on airline pilot recurrent training and evaluation

AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Go, Tiauw H ^a   Bürki Cohen, Judith ^b   Chung, William W ^c   Schroede, Jeffery A ^d   Saillant, Ghislain ^e   Jacobs, Sean ^b   Longridge, Thomas ^f  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

^c SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

^d NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^e NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION   (United States)

^f FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIRCUIT SIMULATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

AIRLINE PILOTS; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; MOTION RESEARCHES; PLATFORM MOTION; RECURRENT TRAINING; SECOND PHASE; SIMULATOR MOTION; TRAINING NEEDS;

FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

EID: 85087194076     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-5678     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bürki-Cohen, J., Soja, N. N., and Longridge, T., "Simulator Platform Motion - The Need Revisited," International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8 (3), 1998, pp. 293-317.
2. Boldovici, J.A., "Simulator Motion," ARI Technical Report 961, US Army Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, 1992.
3. Longridge, T., Bürki-Cohen, J., Go, T.H., and Kendra, A.J., "Simulator Fidelity Considerations for Training and Evaluation of Today's Airline Pilots," Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH, 2001.
4. Go, T. H., Bürki-Cohen, J., and Soja, N. N., "The Effect of Simulator Motion on Pilot Training and Evaluation," AIAA Paper 2000-4296, 2000.
5. Gundry, J., "Man and Motion Cues," Paper presented at the Third Flight Simulation Symposium, London, UK, 1976.
6. Hall, J.R., "The Need for Platform Motion in Modern Piloted Flight Training Simulators," Technical Memorandum FM 35, Royal Aerospace Establishment, London, UK, 1989.
7. Federal Aviation Administration, "Airline Transport Pilot and Aircraft Type Rating," FAA-S- 8081-5. D, Flight Standard Service, Washington, DC, 2001.
8. Sullivan, B.T., and Soukup, P.A., "The NASA 747- 400 Flight Simulator - A National Resource for Aviation Safety Research," AIAA Paper 96-3517, 1996.
9. Bray, R.S., "Initial Operating Experience With an Aircraft Simulator Having Extensive Lateral Motion," NASA TM X-62155, 1972.
10. Sinacori, J. B., "The Determination of Some Requirements for a Helicopter Flight Research Simulation Facility," NASA CR-152066, 1977.
11. Schroeder, J.A., "Helicopter Flight Simulator Motion Platform Requirements," NASA TP-208766, 1999.
12. Mikula, J., Chung, W., and Tran, D., "Motion Fidelity Criteria for Roll-Lateral Translational Tasks," AIAA Paper 99-4329, 1999.
13. Bürki-Cohen, J., Go, T. H., Chung, W. W., Schroeder, J., Jacobs, S., and Longridge, T., "Simulator Fidelity Requirements for Airline Pilot Training and Evaluation Continued: An Update on Motion Requirements Research," Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, 2003.
14. Mulder, M., Chiecchio, J., Pritchett, A., and van Paassen M., "Testing Tunnel-in-the-Sky Displays and Flight Control Systems With and Without Flight Simulator Motion," Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, 2003.
15. Scanlon, C. H., "Effect of Motion Cues During Complex Curved Approach and Landing Tasks," NASA TP-2773, 1987.
16. Hess, R.A., "Theory for Aircraft Handling Qualities Based on a Structural Pilot Model," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 6, 1989, pp. 792-797.