The effect of simulator platform motion on pilot training transfer: A meta-analysis

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 375-393

  Vaden, Eric A ^a   Hall, Steven ^b  

^a EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Galaxy Scientific Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30544448761     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap1504_5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Boldovici, J. A. (1992). Simulator motion (ARI Tech. Rep. No. 961). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
3. Buckhout, R., Sherman, H., Goldsmith, C. T., & Vitale, P. A. (1963). The effect of variations in motion fidelity during training on simulated low-altitude flight (AMRL-TDR-63-108). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: 6570th Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.
4. Bürki-Cohen, J., Go, T. H., & Longbridge, T. (2001, August). Flight simulator fidelity considerations for total air line pilot training and evaluation (AIAA Paper 2001-4425). Paper presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
5. Bürki-Cohen, J., Soja, N. N., & Longbridge, T. (1998). Simulator platform motion - The need revisited. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 293-317.
6. Crosby, J. J., & Parkinson, S. R. (1979). A dual task investigation of pilots skill level. Ergonomics, 22, 1301-1313.
7. Go, T. H., Bürki-Cohen, J., & Soja, N. N. (2000, August). The effect of simulator motion on pilot training and evaluation (AIAA Paper 2000-4296). Paper presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Denver, CO.
8. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2001). Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. Psychological Methods, 6, 135-146.
9. Hall, J. R. (1978, April). Motion versus visual cues in piloted flight simulation (Rep. No. AGARD-CP-249). Paper presented at the Flight Mechanics Panel Specialist' Meeting on Piloted Aircraft Environment Simulation Techniques, Brussels, Belgium.
10. Holding, D. H. (1976). An approximate transfer surface. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 1-9.
11. Holt, R. W., Hansberger, J. T., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2002). Improving rater calibration in aviation: A case study. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 305-330.
12. Hopkins, C. O. (1975). How much should you pay for that box? Human Factors, 17, 533-541.
13. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Jacobs, R. S., Prince, C., Hays, R. T., & Salas, E. (1990). Meta-analysis of the flight simulator training research (NTSC-89-006). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
15. Jacobs, R. S., & Roscoe, S. N. (1975). Simulator cockpit motion and the transfer of initial flight training. In Proceedings of Human Factors Society annual meeting (pp. 218-226). Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16. Jones, S., & Franklin, B. D. (1999). Determining motion-cueing requirements for the Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAAV) Driver Simulator (Marine Corps Report 99-03). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
17. Koonce, J. M. (1979). Predictive validity of flight simulators as a function of simulator motion. Human Factors, 21. 215-223.
18. Lee, A. T., & Bussolari, S. R. (1989). Flight simulator platform motion and air transport pilot training. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 136-140.
19. MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed/accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483-506.
20. Martin, E. L., & Waag, W. L. (1978a). Contributions of platform motion to simulator training effectiveness: Study 1 - Basic contact (AFHRL-TR-78-15). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Research Laboratory.
21. Martin, E. L., and Waag, W. L. (1978b). Contributions of platform motion to simulator training effectiveness: Study 2 - Aerobatics (AFHRL-TR-78-52). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Research Laboratory.
22. McDaniel, W. C., Scott, P. G., & Browning, R. F. (1983). Contribution of platform motion simulation in SH-3 helicopter pilot training, Orlando, FL: U.S. Navy Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.
23. Nataupsky, M., Waag, W. L., Weyer, D. C., McFadden, R. W., & McDowell, E. (1979). Platform motion contributions to simulator training effectiveness: Study 3. Interaction of motion with fields of view (AFHRL-TR-79-25). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Research Laboratory.
24. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
25. Pfeiffer, M. G., & Horey, J. D. (1987). Training effectiveness of aviation motion simulation: A review and analysis of the literature (Special Rep. No. 87-007). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Department of the Navy.
26. Ryan, L. E., Scott, P. G., & Browning, R. F. (1978). The effects of simulator landing practice and the contribution of motion simulation to P-3 pilot training (TAEG-63; ADA0611434). Orlando, FL: Navy Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.
27. Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (1998). It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 197-208.
28. Strachan, I. W. (1997). To move or not to move? That is the question. In Proceedings of the 19th Interservice/Industry, Training, Simulation and Education Conference (pp. 326-344). Orlando, FL: National Training Systems Association.
29. Szczepanski, C., & Leland, O. (2000, August). Move or not to move? Continuous question (AIAA No. 2000-4297). Paper presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Denver, CO.
30. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
31. Van der Pal, J. (1999). The effect of simulator motion on parameter training for F-16 pilots. Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics: Vol. 3. Transportation systems, medical ergonomics and training. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 267-275) Oxford, England: Ashgate.
32. Westra, D. P. (1982). Simulator design features for carrier landing: 2. In-simulator transfer of training (CRG-TR-82-011; NAVTRAEQUIPC-81-0105-1). Westlake Village, CA: Canyon Research Group.
33. Woodruff, R. R., Smith, J. F., Fuller, J. R., & Weyer, D. C. (1976). Full mission simulation in under-graduate pilot training: An exploratory study (AFHRL-TR-76-84). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Research Laboratory.