Simulator platform motion - The need revisited

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 293-317

  Bürki Cohen, Judith ^a   Soja, Nancy N ^c   Longridge, Thomas ^b  

^a VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

^b FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

^c USDOT Volpe Natl Transp Syst C ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032222187     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0803_8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. (1980). Fidelity of simulation for pilot training (Rep. No. AGARD-AR-159). Neuilly sur Seine, France: North Atlantic Treaty Organization .
2. Ashkenas, I. L. (1985, September). Collected flight and simulation comparisons and considerations. Paper presented at the Flight Mechanics Panel Symposium on Flight Simulation, Cambridge, England.
3. Brown, Y. J., Cardullo, F. M., & Sinacori, J. B. (1989). Need-based evaluation of simulator force and motion cueing devices (Rep. No. AIAA 89-3274-CP). Boston, MA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
4. Bussolari, S. R., Young, L. R., & Lee, A. T. (1987, September). The use of vestibular models for design and evaluation of flight simulator motion (Rep. No. AGARD-CP-433, 1988). Paper presented at the Aerospace Medical Panel Symposium on Motion Cues in Flight Simulation and Simulator Induced Sickness, Brussels, Belgium.
5. Bussolari, S. R., Young, L. R., & Lee, A. T. (1989). The use of vestibular models for design and evaluation of flight simulator motion (Rep. No. AIAA 89-3272-CP). Boston, MA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
6. Cross, K. D. (1991, April). Training effectiveness assessment: Methodological Problems and Issues (Rep. No. DOT/FAA/RD-92/2). Paper presented at the NASA/FAA Helicopter Simulator Workshop, Santa Clara, CA.
7. DeBerg, O. H., McFarland, B. P., & Showalter, T. W. (1976, April). The effect of simulator fidelity on engine failure training in the KC-135 aircraft. Paper presented at the Visual and Motion Simulation Conference, Dayton, OH.
8. Dichgans, J., & Brandt, T. (1978). Visual-vestibular interactions: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H.-L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 8. Perception (pp. 755-804). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
9. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.
10. Federal Aviation Administration. (1991, July 29). Airplane Simulator Qualification (Advisory Circular No. 120-40B). Washington, DC: Flight Standards Service.
11. Federal Aviation Administration. (1992, February 5). Airplane Flight Training Device Qualification (Advisory Circular No. 120-45A). Washington, DC: Flight Standards Service.
12. Federal Aviation Administration. (1995). Airline transport pilot and/or type rating practical test standards (Rep. No. FAA-S-8081-5B). Washington, DC: Flight Standards Service.
13. Federal Aviation Regulation, Part 121.( 1980). Advanced Simulation Plan (14 C.F.R., Part 121, Appendix H). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Federal Aviation Regulation, Part 121. (1990). Advanced Qualification Program (14 C.F.R., Part 121, SFAR 58). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Guedry, F. E. J. (1987, September). Technical evaluation report (Rep. No. AGARD-CP-433, 1988). Paper presented at the Aerospace Medical Panel Symposium on Motion Cues in Flight Simulation and Simulator Induced Sickness, Brussels, Belgium.
16. Gundry, J. (1976, April). Man and motion cues. Paper presented at the Third Flight Simulation Symposium, London.
17. Hall, J. R. (1978, April). Motion versus visual cues in piloted flight simulation (Rep. No. AGARD-CP-249). Paper presented at the Flight Mechanics Panel Specialists' Meeting on Piloted Aircraft Environment Simulation Techniques, Brussels, Belgium.
18. Hall, J. R. (1989). The need for platform motion in modern piloted flight training simulators (Tech. Memo. No. FM 35). Bedford, England: Royal Aerospace Establishment.
19. Hosman, R. J. A. W. (1996). Pilot's perception and control of aircraft motions. Delft, The Netherlands: Delftse Universitaire Pers.
20. Hosman, R. J. A. W., & van der Vaart, J. C. (1981). Effects of vestibular and visual motion perception on task performance. Acta Psychologica, 48, 271-287.
21. Jacobs, R. S. (1976). Simulator cockpit motion and the transfer of initial flight training (Tech. Rep. No. ARL-76-8/AFOSR-76-4). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation, Aviation Research Laboratory.
22. Joint FAA/Industry Symposium. (1996, March). Symposium on Level B Airplane Simulator Aero-model Validation Requirements, Washington Dulles Airport Hilton. (Transcript available in electronic format from Thomas Longridge, Advanced Qualification Program Manager, FAA AFS-230, phone: 703-661-0275)
23. Joint FAA/Industry Symposium. (1996, June). Symposium on Level B Airplane Simulator Motion Requirements, Washington Dulles Airport Hilton. (Transcript available in electronic format from Thomas Longridge, Advanced Qualification Program Manager, FAA AFS-230, phone: 703-661-0275)
24. Koonce, J. M. (1974). Effects of ground-based aircraft simulator motion conditions upon prediction of pilot proficiency. Part II (Rep. No. AFOSR-TR-74-1292). Savoy: University of Illinois.
25. Lee, A. T., & Bussolari, S. R. (1989). Flight simulator platform motion and air transport pilot training. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 136-140.
26. Levison, W. H. (1981). Effects of whole-body motion simulation on flight skill development (Final Rep. No. AFOSR-TR-82-006). Washington, DC: Bolling Air Force Base, Office of Scientific Research.
27. Levison, W. H., & Junker, A. M. (1977). A model for the pilot's use of motion cues in roll-axis tracking tasks (Interim Scientific Rep. No. AMRL-TR-77-40). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, Air Force Systems Command.
28. Longridge, T., Ray, P., Boothe, E., & Bürki-Cohen, J. (1996, May). Initiative towards more affordable flight simulators for U.S. commuter airline training. Paper presented at the Royal Aeronautical Society Conference on Training - Lowering the Cost, Maintaining the Fidelity, London.
29. Martin, E. A. (1985, April). An investigation regarding the use of a dynamic seat-pan display for training and as a device for communicating roll-axis motion information. Paper presented at the Third Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
30. Martin, E. L. (1981). Training effectiveness of platform motion: Review of motion research involving the advanced simulator for pilot training and the simulator for air-to-air combat (Final Rep. No. AFHRL-TR-79-51). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Forces Human Resources Laboratory.
31. McCauley, M. E. (Ed.). (1984). Research issues in simulator sickness: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
32. McCauley, M. E., Hettinger, L. J., Sharkey, T. J., & Sinacori, J. B. (1990). The effects of simulator visual-motion asynchrony on simulator induced sickness. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
33. McGuiness, J., Bouwman, J. H., & Forbes, J. M. (1981). Simulator sickness occurrences in the 2E6 Air Combat Maneuvering Simulator (Rep. No. NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 80-C-0135-4500-1). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Equipment Center.
34. National Transportation Safety Board. (1993). Safety recommendation A-93-72. Washington, DC: Author.
35. Oman, C. (1991). Sensory conflict in motion sickness: An observer theory approach. In S. R. Ellis, M. K. Kaiser, & A. C. Grunwald (Eds.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 362-376). New York: Taylor & Francis.
36. Reid, L. D., & Nahon, M. A. (1988). Response of airline pilots to variations in flight simulator motion algorithms. Journal of Aircraft, 25, 639-646.
37. Ryan, L. E., Scott, P. G., & Browning, R. F. (1978). The effects of simulator landing practice and the contribution of motion simulation to P-3 training (TAEG Rep. No. 63). Orlando, FL: Navy Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.
38. Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Section IV: Space and motion perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Sensory processes and perception (Vol. 1, pp. IV-3-IV-7). New York: Wiley.
39. Waag, W. L. (1981). Training effectiveness of visual and motion simulation (Interim Rep. No. AFHRL-TR-79-72). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
40. Young, L. R. (1967). Some effects of motion cues on manual tracking. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 4, 1300-1303.