The effect of simulator motion cues on initial training of airline pilots

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference 2005

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 516-527

  Bürki Cohen, Judith ^a,c,d   Go, Tiauw H ^b,d,e  

^a VOLPE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Human Factors Division   (Australia)

^d AIAA   (United States)

^e Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); SIMULATORS; TRAINING AIRCRAFT;

AIRLINE PILOTS; RECURRENT TRAINING; SIMULATOR MOTION;

AIR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 29244450534     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-6109     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Federal Aviation Regulation, "Advanced Simulation Plan," 14 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 121, Appendix H, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1980.
2. Federal Aviation Administration, "Airplane Simulator Qualification," Advisory Circular No. 120-40B, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 1991.
3. Federal Aviation Administration, "Airplane Flight Training Device Qualification," Advisory Circular No. 120-45A, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 1992.
4. U.S. Department of Transportation/FAA, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, "Flight Simulation Device Initial and Continuing Qualification and Use," Docket Management System FAA-2002-12461, filed September 25, 2002.
5. Air Transport Association of America, Inc., Simulator Technical Issues Group, "Comments," Docket Management System FAA-2002-12461-29, filed February 19, 2003.
6. U.S. Department of Transportation/FAA, Report, "FSD ARC Recommendations of Part 60 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking," Docket Management System FAA-2002-12461-84, filed February 3, 2004.
7. Bürki-Cohen, J. (Ed.), "Joint FAA/Industry Symposium on Level B Airplane Simulator Motion Requirements," Washington Dulles Airport Hilton, June 19-20, 1996, electronic transcript, URL: http://www.volpe.dot.gov/opsad/ valreqju.html [cited 15 July 2005].
8. Howard, I.P., "The Perception of Posture, Self Motion, and the Visual Vertical," Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Vol. 1. Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas, New York, 1986, pp. 18-1 to 18-62.
9. Bürki-Cohen, J., Soja, N., and Longridge, T., "Simulator Platform Motion-The Need Revisited," International Journal of Aviation Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1998, pp. 293-317.
10. Chung, W.Y., Schroeder, J.A., and Johnson, W.J., "Effects of Vehicle Bandwidth and Visual Spatial-Frequency on Simulation Cueing Synchronization Requirements," AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Collection of Technical Papers (A97-37244 10-08), AIAA, Washington, DC, 1997.
11. Mack, A., "The Perception of Posture, Self Motion, and the Visual Vertical," Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Vol. 1. Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. Thomas, New York, 1986, pp. 17-1 to 17-38.
12. Go, T.H., Bürki-Cohen, J., and Soja, N.N., "The Effect of Simulator Motion on Pilot Training and Evaluation." AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference (AIAA 2000-4296), AIAA, Washington, DC, 2000.
13. Bürki-Cohen, J., Soja, N.N., Go, T.H., Boothe, E.M., DiSario, R., and Jo, Y.J., "Simulator Fidelity: The Effect of Platform Motion," DOT/FAA/RD-01/XX, 2001, unpublished.
14. Schroeder, J.A., "Helicopter Flight Simulation Motion Platform Requirements," NASA TP-1999-208766, July 1999.
15. Bray, R.S., "Initial Operating Experience with an Aircraft Simulator Having Extensive Lateral Motion," NASA TM X-62155, 1972.
16. Bürki-Cohen, J., Go, T.H., Chung, W.Y., Schroeder, J.A., Jacobs, S., and Longridge, T., "Simulator Fidelity Requirements for Airline-Pilot Training and Evaluation Continued: An Update on Motion Requirements Research," Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, April 2003.
17. Go, T.H., Bürki-Cohen, J., Chung, W.Y, Schroeder, J.A., Saillant, G., Jacobs, J., "The Effects of Enhanced Hexapod Motion on Airline Pilot Recurrent Training and Evaluation," AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference (AIAA-2003-5678), AIAA, Washington, DC, 2003.
18. Morgan, P.L., "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: Philosophical and Practical Considerations of a Statistical Controversy," Exceptionality, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2003, pp. 209-221.
19. Streiner, D.L., "Unicorns Do Exist: A Tutorial on 'Proving' the Null Hypothesis," Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 48, No. 11, 2003, 756-761.
20. nd ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1988.
21. Kemeny A., "Perception and Simulation," Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference, Paris, July 1999, pp.13-28.
22. Federal Aviation Administration, "Airline Transport Pilot and Aircraft Type Rating: Practical Test Standards for Airplane," FAA-S-8081-5D with change 1, Flight Standards Service, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC., 2001.
23. Boldovici, J.A., "Simulator Motion," ARI Technical Report 961, U.S. Army Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, 1992.
24. Taylor, H.L., Lintern, G., and Koonce, J.M., "Quasi-Transfer as a Predictor of Transfer From Simulator to Airplane," The Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 120, No. 3, 1995, pp. 257-276.