A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence from event-related potentials

Brain and Language

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 232-237

  Dhooge, Elisah ^a   Baene, Wouter De ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distractor frequency effect; Event related potentials; Lexical selection; Picture word interference; Response exclusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRACTIBILITY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PICTURE WORD INTERFERENCE; SPEECH; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84873459720     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database 1993, CD-ROM, Philadelphia, PA.
2. Burt Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1019-1038.
3. Dell G.S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 1986, 93:283-321.
4. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:878-891.
5. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: Further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2011, 18:116-122.
6. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. How do speakers resist distraction? Evidence from a taboo picture-word interference task. Psychological Science 2011, 22:855-859.
7. Dhooge E., Hartsuiker R.J. Lexical selection and verbal self-monitoring: Effects of lexicality, context, and time pressure in picture-word interference. Journal of Memory and Language 2012, 66:163-176.
8. Duyck W., Anseel F., Szmalec A., Mestdagh P., Tavernier A., Hartsuiker R.J. Improving accuracy in detecting acoustic onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 43:1317-1326.
9. Hartsuiker R.J., Kolk H.H.J. Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42:113-157.
10. Hauk O., Pulvermüller F. Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophisiology 2004, 115:1090-1103.
11. Indefrey P., Levelt W.J.M. The spatial and temporal signature of word production components. Cognition 2004, 92:101-144.
12. Janssen N., Schirm W., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: Evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:249-256.
13. Levelt W.M.J., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:1-75.
14. Mädebach A., Oppermann F., Hantsch A., Curda C., Jescheniak J. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 37:522-538.
15. Mahon B.Z., Costa A., Peterson R., Vargas K.A., Caramazza A. Lexical selection is not by competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:503-533.
16. Malmberg K.J., Steyers M., Stephens J.D., Shiffrin R.M. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition 2002, 30:607-613.
17. Möller J., Jansma B.M., Rodriguez-Fornells A., Münte T.F. What the brain does before the tongue slips. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:1173-1178.
18. Miozzo M., Caramazza A. When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:228-252.
19. Nowagk R., Pfeifer E. UNIX implementation of the ERP evaluation package (EEP 3.0). Annual report of Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, Leipzig, Germany, Max-Planck-Institute. A.D. Friederici, D.Y. Von Cramon (Eds.).
20. Piai V., Roelofs A., Schriefers H. Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language 2011, 64:404-423.
21. Roelofs A. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition 1992, 42:107-142.
22. Roelofs A. The WEAVER model of word form encoding in speech production. Cognition 1997, 64:249-284.
23. Roelofs A. From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling. Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones 2005, 313-330. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ. A. Cutler (Ed.).
24. Severens E., Van Lommel S., Ratinckx E., Hartsuiker R.J. Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica 2005, 119:159-187.
25. Starreveld, P., La Heij, W., Verdonschot, R. (2011). Time course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of the response exclusion account. Language and Cognitive Processes, ifirst, 1-22.
26. Stevens M., Lammertyn J., Verbruggen F., Vandierendonck A. Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods 2006, 38:280-286.
27. Strijkers K., Costa A. Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course on lexical access in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:356.
28. Strijkers K., Costa A., Thierry G. Tracking lexical access in speech production: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:912-928.