Embodying the Mind by Extending It

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 33-51

  Jacob, Pierre ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873244746     PISSN: 18785158     EISSN: 18785166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-012-0087-2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adams, F., and K. Aizawa. 2008. The bounds of cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Aizawa, K. 2007. Understanding the embodiment of perception. The Journal of Philosophy 54(1): 5-25.
3. Aziz-Zadeh, L., S. M. Wilson, G. Rizzolatti, and M. Iacoboni. 2006. Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology 16: 1-6.
4. Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577-660.
5. Barsalou, L. W., W. K. Simmons, A. K. Barbey, and C. D. Wilson. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2): 84-91.
6. Bedny, M., and A. Caramazza. 2011. Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1224: 81-95.
7. Block, N. 2005. Review of A. Noë Action in Perception. The Journal of Philosophy 52(5): 259-72.
8. Boulenger, V., A. C. Roy, Y. Paulignan, V. Deprez, M. Jeannerod, and T. A. Nazir. 2006. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 ms of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 1607-1615.
9. Boulenger, V., L. Mechtouff, S. Thobois, E. Broussolle, M. Jeannerod, and T. Nazir. 2008a. Word processing in Parkinson's disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia 46(2): 743-756.
10. Boulenger, V., B. Y. Silber, A. C. Roy, Y. Paulignan, M. Jeannerod, and T. Nazir. 2008b. Subliminal display of action words interferes with motor planning: a combined EEG and kinematic study. Journal of Physiology 102: 130-136.
11. Buccino, G., L. Riggio, G. Melli, F. Binkofski, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 24: 355-363.
12. Burge, T. 1979. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73-121.
13. Burge, T. 1993. Content preservation. Philosophical Review 102: 457-488.
14. Cardinali, L., F. Frassinetti, C. Brozzoli, C. Urquizar, A. C. Roy, and A. Farnè. 2009. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology 19(12): R478.
15. Chalmers, D. 2008. Foreword to A. Clark, Supersizing the mind, embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge: MIT.
17. Clark, A. 2002. Minds, brains and tools. In Philosophy of mental representations, ed. H. Clapin, 66-90. Oxford: Clarendon.
18. Clark, A. 2008a. Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 37-59.
19. Clark, A. 2008b. Supersizing the mind, embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Clark, A. 2009. Where is my mind? London Review of Book 31, 6, 26 March 2009.
21. Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7-19.
22. Crane, T. 1992. The nonconceptual content of experience. In The contents of experience, essays on perception, ed. T. Crane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Dehaene, S., and L. Cohen. 2011. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(6): 254-262.
24. Dempsey, L., and I. Shani. 2012. Stressing the flesh: in defense of strong embodied cognition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
25. Dennett, D. C. 1996. Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.
26. Fodor, J. A. 1974. Special sciences. Synthese 28: 97-115.
27. Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
28. Fodor, J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT.
29. Fodor, J. A. 1994. The elm and the expert. Cambridge: MIT.
30. Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts, where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Fodor, J. A. 2007. The revenge of the given. In Contemporary debates in philosophy of mind, ed. B. P. McLaughlin and J. D. Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Fodor, J. A. 2009. Where is my mind? London Review of Books 31, 3, 12 February 2009.
33. Gallagher, S. 2005. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Gallese, V., and G. Lakoff. 2005. The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 455-479.
35. Gallese, V., and C. Sinigaglia. 2011. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11: 512-519.
36. Glenberg, A. M., and M. P. Kaschak. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3): 558-565.
37. Goldman, A., and F. de Vignemont. 2009. Is social cognition embodied? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(4): 154-159.
38. Haugeland, J. 1998. Mind embodied and embedded. In Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind, ed. J. Haugeland, 207-240. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39. Hauk, O., I. Johnsrude, and F. Pulvermüller. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41: 301-307.
40. Jacob, P. 2002. Review of Rowlands, M. The body in mind. Mind and Language 17(3): 325-331.
41. Machery, E. 2006. Two dogmas of neo-empiricism. Philosophy Compass 1(4): 398-412.
42. Machery, E. 2007. Concept empiricism: A methodological critique. Cognition 104: 19-46.
43. Mahon, B. Z., and A. Caramazza. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology 102: 59-70.
44. Mahon, B. Z., and A. Caramazza. 2009. A concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 27-51.
45. Maravita, A., and A. Iriki. 2004. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(2): 79-86.
46. Margolis, E., S. Laurence. 2006. Concepts. Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy, plato. stanford. edu/entries/concepts/.
47. McCandliss, B. D., L. Cohen, and S. Dehaene. 2003. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(7): 293-299.
48. McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49. Millikan, R. 1984. Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge: MIT.
50. Noë, A. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT.
51. Prinz, J. 2005. The return of concept empiricism. In Categorization and cognitive science, eds. H. Cohen, C. Leferbvre. Elsevier.
52. Pulvermüller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Review Neuroscience 6: 576-582.
53. Pulvermüller, F., O. Hauk, V. V. Nikulin, and R. J. Ilmoniemi. 2005. Functional interaction of language and action: a TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 21: 793-797.
54. Putnam, H. 1967. The nature of mental states. In Mind, language and reality, philosophical papers, vol. 2, ed. Putnam, H. (1975). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Putnam, H. 1975. The meaning of 'meaning'. In Mind, language and reality, philosophical papers, vol. 2, ed. H. Putnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Rizzolatti, G., and L. Craighero. 2004. The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169-92.
57. Rowlands, M. 1999. The body in mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Rowlands, M. 2010. The new science of the mind. Cambridge: MIT.
59. Sato, M., L. Cattaneo, G. Rizzolatti, and V. Gallese. 2007. Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(4): 684-693.
60. Shapiro, L. 2004. The mind incarnate. Cambridge: MIT.
61. Shapiro, L. 2007. The embodied cognition research programme. Philosophy Compass 2(2): 338-346.
62. Sperber, D. 2001. An evolutionary perspective on testimony and argumentation. Philosophical Topics 29: 401-413.
63. Sperber, D., F. Clément, C. Heintz, O. Mascaro, H. Mercier, G. Origgi, and D. Wilson. 2010. Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 25(4): 359-393.
64. Tettamanti, M., G. Buccino, M. C. Saccuman, G. Gallese, M. Danna, P. Scifo, F. Fazio, G. Rizzolatti, S. F. Cappa, and D. Perani. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2): 273-281.
65. Willems, R. M., P. Hagoort, and D. Casasanto. 2009. Body-specific representations of action verbs: neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science 21(1): 67-74.
66. Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625-636.
67. Wilson, R., L. Foglia. 2011. Embodied cognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/embodied-cognition/.