Plant RNA chaperones in stress response

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 100-106

  Kang, Hunseung ^a   Park, Su Jung ^a   Kwak, Kyung Jin ^a  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; PLANT RNA; RNA BINDING PROTEIN; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; RNA PROCESSING;

MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; RNA PROCESSING, POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL; RNA, PLANT; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 84873192633     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Lorkovic Z.J., Barta A. Genomic analysis: RNA recognition motif (RRM) and K homology (KH) domain RNA-binding proteins from the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:623-635.
2. Burd C.G., Dreyfuss G. Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA binding proteins. Science 1994, 265:615-621.
3. Albà M.M., Pagès M. Plant proteins containing the RNA-recognition motif. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3:15-21.
4. Maris C., et al. The RNA recognition motif, a plastic RNA-binding platform to regulate post-transcriptional gene expression. FEBS J. 2005, 272:2118-2131.
5. Kenan D.J., et al. RNA recognition: towards identifying determinants of specificity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1991, 16:214-220.
6. Nagai K., et al. The RNP domain: a sequence specific RNA-binding domain involved in processing and transport of RNA. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995, 20:235-240.
7. Lorkovic Z.J. Role of plant RNA-binding proteins in development, stress response and genome organization. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:229-236.
8. Cook K.B., et al. RBPDB: a database of RNA-binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D301-D308.
9. Ambrosone A., et al. Beyond transcription: RNA-binding proteins as emerging regulators of plant response to environmental constraints. Plant Sci. 2012, 182:12-18.
10. Sachetto-Martins G., et al. Plant glycine-rich proteins: a family or just proteins with a common motif?. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1492:1-14.
11. Herschlag D. RNA chaperones and the RNA folding problem. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:20871-20874.
12. Woodson S.A. Taming free energy landscapes with RNA chaperones. RNA Biol. 2010, 7:677-686.
13. Schroeder R., et al. Strategies for RNA folding and assembly. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:908-919.
14. Rajkowitsch L., et al. RNA chaperones, RNA annealers and RNA helicases. RNA Biol. 2007, 4:118-130.
15. Herschlag D., et al. An RNA chaperone activity of non-specific RNA binding proteins in hammerhead ribozyme catalysis. EMBO J. 1994, 13:2913-2924.
16. Cristofari G., Darlix J.L. The ubiquitous nature of RNA chaperone proteins. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2002, 72:223-268.
17. Rajkowitsch L., et al. Assays for the RNA chaperone activity of proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33:450-456.
18. Semrad K. Proteins with RNA chaperone activity: a world of diverse proteins with a common task-Impediment of RNA misfolding. Biochem. Res. Int. 2011, 2011. 10.1155/2011/532908.
19. Mayer O., et al. RNA chaperone activity and RNA-binding properties of the E. coli protein StpA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:1257-1269.
20. Ivanyi-Nagy R., et al. Disordered RNA chaperone proteins: from functions to disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62:1409-1417.
21. Ivanyi-Nagy R., et al. RNA chaperoning and intrinsic disorder in the core proteins of Flaviviridae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:712-725.
22. Tompa P., Kovacs D. Intrinsically disordered chaperones in plants and animals. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 88:167-174.
23. Tompa P., Csermely P. The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and protein chaperones. FASEB J. 2004, 18:1169-1175.
24. Mallama A.L., et al. Solution structures of DEAD-box RNA chaperones reveal conformational changes and nucleic acid tethering by a basic tail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:12254-12259.
25. Beich-Frandsen M., et al. Structural insights into the dynamics and function of the C-terminus of the E. coli RNA chaperone Hfq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:4900-4915.
26. Zúňiga S., et al. Role of RNA chaperones in virus replication. Virus Res. 2009, 139:253-266.
27. Kwak K.J., et al. Structural determinants crucial to the RNA chaperone activity of glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins 4 and 7 in Arabidopsis thaliana during the cold adaptation process. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:4003-4011.
28. Chambers J.R., Bender K.S. The RNA chaperone Hfq is important for growth and stress tolerance in Francisella novicida. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19797.
29. Rabhi M., et al. The Sm-like RNA chaperone Hfq mediates transcription antitermination at Rho-dependent terminators. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2805-2816.
30. Chaulk S.G., et al. ProQ is an RNA chaperone that controls ProP levels in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 2011, 50:3095-3106.
31. Mangeon A., et al. Functional diversity of the plant glycine-rich proteins superfamily. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5:99-104.
32. Phadtare S., et al. Cold-shock response and cold-shock proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2:175-180.
33. Jiang W., et al. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:196-202.
34. Phadtare S., et al. The nucleic acid melting activity of Escherichia coli CspE is critical for transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:7239-7245.
35. Phadtare S. Unwinding activity of cold shock proteins and RNA metabolism. RNA Biol. 2011, 8:394-397.
36. Mihailovich M., et al. Eukaryotic cold shock domain proteins: highly versatile regulators of gene expression. Bioessays 2010, 32:109-118.
37. Sasaki K., Imai R. Pleiotropic roles of cold shock domain proteins in plants. Front. Plant Gen. Genomics 2012, 2:116.
38. Karlson D., Imai R. Conservation of the cold shock domain protein family in plants. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131:12-15.
39. Chaikam V., Karlson D. Comparison of structure, function and regulation of plant cold shock domain proteins to bacterial and animal cold shock domain proteins. BMB Rep. 2010, 43:1-8.
40. Chaikam V., Karlson D. Functional characterization of two cold shock domain proteins from Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:995-1006.
41. Park S.J., et al. Cold shock domain proteins affect seed germination and growth of Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50:869-878.
42. Kim J.S., et al. Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote the cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:506-516.
43. Park S.J., et al. The C-terminal zinc finger domain of Arabidopsis cold shock domain proteins is important for RNA chaperone activity during cold adaptation. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:543-547.
44. Nakaminami K., et al. Functional conservation of cold shock domains in bacteria and higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:10122-10127.
45. Fusaro A.F., et al. AtGRP2, a cold-induced nucleo-cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein, has a role in flower and seed development. Planta 2007, 225:1339-1351.
46. Sasaki K., et al. Arabidopsis COLD SHOCK DOMAIN PROTEIN2 is a RNA chaperone that is regulated by cold and developmental signals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 364:633-638.
47. Kim M.-H., et al. Cold shock domain protein 3 regulates freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:23454-23460.
48. Castiglioni P., et al. Bacterial RNA chaperones confer abiotic stress tolerance in plants and improved grain yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:446-455.
49. Graumann P.L., Marahiel M.A. A superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998, 23:286-290.
50. Maruyama K., et al. Conservation of structure and cold-regulation of RNA-binding proteins in cyanobacteria: probable convergent evolution with eukaryotic glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acid Res. 1999, 27:2029-2036.
51. Kim J.Y., et al. Functional characterization of a glycine-rich RNA-binding protein2 in Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress conditions. Plant J. 2007, 50:439-451.
52. Kim J.S., et al. Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein7 affects abiotic stress responses by regulating stomata opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55:455-466.
53. Kwak K.J., et al. Characterization of transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing GR-RBP4 under high salinity, dehydration, or cold stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56:3007-3016.
54. Kim J.Y., et al. Glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins are functionally conserved in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa during cold adaptation process. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:2317-2325.
55. Kim Y.O., et al. Cold-inducible zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein contributes to the enhancement of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 42:890-900.
56. Kim Y.O., Kang H. The role of a zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein during the cold adaptation process in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47:793-798.
57. Kim J.Y., et al. Zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein in Oryza sativa has an RNA chaperone activity under cold stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33:759-768.
58. Wang C., et al. A glycine-rich RNA-binding protein can mediate physiological responses in transgenic plants under salt stress. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39:1047-1053.
59. Rocak S., Linder P. DEAD-box proteins: the driving forces behind DNA metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:232-241.
60. Linder P., Jankowsky E. From unwinding to clamping-the DEAD box RNA helicase family. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:505-516.
61. Jankowsky E. RNA helicases at work: binding and rearranging. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:19-29.
62. Tanner N.K., Linder P. DExD/H box RNA helicases: from generic motors to specific dissociation functions. Mol. Cell 2001, 8:251-262.
63. Lorsch J.R. RNA chaperones exist and DEAD-box proteins get a life. Cell 2002, 109:797-800.
64. Owttrim G.W. RNA helicases and abiotic stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:3220-3230.
65. Aubourg S., et al. The DEAD box RNA helicase family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27:628-636.
66. Umate P., et al. Genome-wide analysis of helicase gene family from rice and Arabidopsis: a comparison with yeast and human. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73:449-465.
67. Chamot D., Owttrim G.W. Regulation of cold shock-induced RNA helicase gene expression in the Cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182:1251-1256.
68. Lim J., et al. Low temperature regulated DEAD-box RNA helicase from the Antarctic archaeon, Methanococcoides burtonii. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 297:553-567.
69. Kreps J.A., et al. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130:2129-2141.
70. Fowler S., Thomashow M.F. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 2002, 14:1675-1690.
71. Gong Z., et al. RNA helicase-like protein as an early regulator of transcription factors for plant chilling and freezing tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:11507-11512.
72. Gong Z., et al. A dead box RNA helicase is essential for mRNA export and important for development and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:256-267.
73. Zhu J., et al. Interplay between cold responsive gene regulation, metabolism and RNA processing during plant cold acclimation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:290-295.
74. Kant P., et al. STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR1 and STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR2, two DEAD-box RNA helicases that attenuate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:814-830.
75. Nakamura T., et al. Structural and transcriptional characterization of a salt-responsive gene encoding putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase in barley. Plant Sci. 2004, 167:63-70.
76. Briolat V., Reysset G. Identification of the Clostridium perfringens genes involved in the adaptive response to oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184:2333-2343.
77. Li D., et al. OsBIRH1, a DEAD-box RNA helicase with functions in modulating defence responses against pathogen infection and oxidative stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:2133-2146.
78. Montero-Lomeli M., et al. The initiation factor eIF4A is involved in the response to lithium stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:21542-21548.
79. Kim J.S., et al. Functional characterization of DEAD-box RNA helicases in Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:1563-1571.
80. Cassola A., et al. RNA recognition motifs involved in nuclear import of RNA-binding proteins. RNA Biol. 2010, 7:339-344.
81. Chinnusamy V., et al. Nuclear RNA export and its importance in abiotic stress responses of plants. Nuclear pre-mRNA Processing in Plants 2008, 235-255. Springer-Verlag. A.S.N. Reddy, M. Golovkin (Eds.).
82. Streitner C., et al. Global transcript profiling of transgenic plants constitutively overexpressing the RNA-binding protein AtGRP7. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:221.
83. Yang Y., Karlson D. Overexpression of AtCSP4 affects late stages of embryo development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:2079-2091.
84. Lorković Z.J., et al. Evolutionary conservation of minor U12-type spliceosome between plants and humans. RNA 2005, 11:1095-1107.
85. Russell A.G., et al. An early evolutionary origin for the minor spliceosome. Nature 2006, 443:863-866.
86. Kim W.Y., et al. The Arabidopsis U12-types spliceosomal protein U11/U12-31K is involved in U12 intron splicing via RNA chaperone activity and affects plant development. Plant Cell 2010, 22:3951-3962.
87. del Campo E.M. Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression. Gene Regul. Syst. Biol. 2009, 3:31-47.
88. Mohr S., et al. DEAD-box protein functions as an ATP-dependent RNA chaperone in group I intron splicing. Cell 2002, 109:769-779.
89. Huang H.R., et al. The splicing of yeast mitochondrial group I and group II introns requires a DEAD-box protein with RNA chaperone function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:163-168.
90. Bhaskaran H., Russell R. Kinetic redistribution of native and misfolded RNAs by a DEAD-box chaperone. Nature 2007, 449:1014-1019.
91. Halls C., et al. Involvement of DEAD-box proteins in group I and group II intron splicing: biochemical characterization of Mss116p, ATP hydrolysis-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and general RNA chaperone activity. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365:835-855.
92. Mohr S., et al. A DEAD-box protein alone promotes group II intron splicing and reverse splicing by acting as an RNA chaperone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:3569-3574.
93. Karunatilaka K.S., et al. Single-molecule analysis of Mss116-mediated group II intron folding. Nature 2010, 467:935-939.
94. Asakura Y., et al. Chloroplast RH3 DEAD box RNA helicases in maize and Arabidopsis function in splicing of specific group II introns and affect chloroplast ribosome biogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159:961-974.