Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS)

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Puschner, Bernd ^a   Neumann, Petra ^a   Jordan, Harriet ^b   Slade, Mike ^b   Fiorillo, Andrea ^c   Giacco, Domenico ^c   Égerházi, Anikó ^d   Ivánka, Tibor ^d   Bording, Malene Krogsgaard ^e   Sørensen, Helle Østermark ^e,k   Bär, Arlette ^f   Kawohl, Wolfram ^f   Loos, Sabine ^a   Arnold, Katrin ^g   Ay, Esra ^g   Becker, Thomas ^g   Konrad, Jana ^g   Steffen, Sabine ^g   Zentner, Nadja ^g   Clarke, Elly ^h   Maj, Mario ⁱ   Luciano, Mario ⁱ   De Rosa, Corrado ⁱ   Sampogna, Gaia ⁱ   Del Vecchio, Valeria ⁱ   Cozzolino, Pasquale ⁱ   Del Vecchio, Heide Gret ⁱ   Salzano, Antonio ⁱ   Nagy, Marietta ^j   Berecz, Roland ^j   Glaub, Teodóra ^j   Süveges, Ágnes ^j   Kovacs, Attila ^j   Magyar, Erzsebet ^j   Munk Jørgensen, Povl ^k   Larsen, Jens Ivar ^k   Rössler, Wulf ^l   Krömer, Susanne ^l   Mutschler, Jochen ^l   Obermann, Caitriona ^l   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^e AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^g CEDAR study group   (Germany)

^h CEDAR study group   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ CEDAR study group   (Italy)

^j CEDAR study group   (Hungary)

^k CEDAR study group   (Denmark)

^l CEDAR study group   (Switzerland)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DENMARK; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUNGARY; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL PATIENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SWITZERLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDITY;

ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DECISION MAKING; DENMARK; FEMALE; GERMANY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; HUNGARY; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84873188956     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-48     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997, 44:681-692. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3, 9032835.
2. Coulter A. The autonomous patient: ending paternalism in medical care 2003, London: The Nuffield Trust, TSO.
3. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research Making health care decisions: a report on the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship 1982, Washington, D.C: US Government Printing Office, President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
4. Brar SS, Stone GW. Decision-making: stenting in acute myocardial infarction. Future Cardiol 2010, 6:301-314. 10.2217/fca.10.12, 20462337.
5. Cunningham VL. The outcome wheel: a potential tool for shared decision-making in ischemic stroke thrombolysis. CJEM 2008, 10:545-551.
6. Sajid S, Mohile SG, Szmulewitz R, Posadas E, Dale W. Individualized decision-making for older men with prostate cancer: balancing cancer control with treatment consequences across the clinical spectrum. Semin Oncol 2011, 38:309-325. 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.01.011, 21421119.
7. Tariman JD, Berry DL, Cochrane B, Doorenbos A, Schepp K. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2010, 21:1145-1151. 10.1093/annonc/mdp534, 19940010.
8. O'Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Charles C, Ellis PM, Gafni A, Lovrics P, Hasler A, Dimitry S. Women's perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:431-436. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.015, 18755565.
9. Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options?. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:1067-1073. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.5472, 17369570.
10. Bieber C, Muller KG, Blumenstiel K, Hochlehnert A, Wilke S, Hartmann M, Eich W. A shared decision-making communication training program for physicians treating fibromyalgia patients: effects of a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res 2008, 64:13-20. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.05.009, 18157994.
11. Drake RE, Deegan PE. Shared decision making is an ethical imperative. Psychiatr Serv 2009, 60:1007. 10.1176/appi.ps.60.8.1007, 19648184.
12. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Schizophrenia: core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in adults in primary and secondary care 2009, London: The British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists, National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health.
13. Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S. Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010, (1):CD007297.
14. Watt S. Clinical decision-making in the context of chronic illness. Health Expect 2000, 3:6. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00076.x, 11281907.
15. Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M. Integrating decision making and mental health interventions research: research directions. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2006, 13:9-25.
16. Puschner B, Steffen S, Slade M, Kaliniecka H, Maj M, Fiorillo A, Munk-Jorgensen P, Larsen JI, Egerhazi A, Nemes Z, et al. Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol. BMC Psychiatry 2010, 10:90. 10.1186/1471-244X-10-90, 2992484, 21062508.
17. Simon D, Loh A, Harter M. Measuring (shared) decision-making-a review of psychometric instruments. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2007, 101:259-267. 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.029, 17601182.
18. Dy SM. Instruments for Evaluating Shared Medical Decision Making. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64:623-649. 10.1177/1077558707305941, 17804824.
19. Scholl I, Loon MK, Sepucha K, Elwyn G, Legare F, Härter M, Dirmaier J. Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2011, 105:313-324. 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012, 21620327.
20. Legare F, Moher D, Elwyn G, Leblanc A, Gravel K. Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007, 7:30. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30, 2151936, 17937801.
21. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract 2000, 50:892-899. 1313854, 11141876.
22. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ 1999, 319:766-771. 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766, 1116602, 10488010.
23. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Pol 1997, 2:112-121.
24. Wills CE, Holmes-Rovner M. Preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision scale with depressed primary care patients. Health Expect 2003, 6:149-159. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00220.x, 12752743.
25. Simon D, Schorr G, Wirtz M, Vodermaier A, Caspari C, Neuner B, Spies C, Krones T, Keller H, Edwards A, et al. Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q). Patient Educ Couns 2006, 63:319-327. 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.012, 16872793.
26. Decision Self-Efficacy Scale http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_self.html.
27. Bunn H, O'Connor A. Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry. Can J Nurs Res 1996, 28:13-27.
28. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989, 4:23-30. 10.1007/BF02596485, 2644407.
29. Hamann J, Cohen R, Leucht S, Busch R, Kissling W. Do patients with schizophrenia wish to be involved in decisions about their medical treatment?. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162:2382-2384. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2382, 16330606.
30. Hamann J, Mendel R, Schebitz M, Reiter S, Buhner M, Cohen R, Berthele A, Kissling W. Can psychiatrists and neurologists predict their patients' participation preferences?. J Nerv Ment Dis 2010, 198:309-311. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d6128c, 20386262.
31. Hamann J, Bieber C, Elwyn G, Wartner E, Horlein E, Kissling W, Toegel C, Berth H, Linde K, Schneider A. How do patients from eastern and western Germany compare with regard to their preferences for shared decision making?. Eur J Public Health 2011, online first.
32. Hamann J, Neuner B, Kasper J, Vodermaier A, Loh A, Deinzer A, Heesen C, Kissling W, Busch R, Schmieder R, et al. Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions. Health Expect 2007, 10:358-363. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00458.x, 17986072.
33. Simon D, Kriston L, Loh A, Spies C, Scheibler F, Wills C, Harter M. Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API). Health Expect 2010, 13:234-243.
34. Slade M, Jordan H, Clarke E, Arnold K, Fiorillo A, Giacco D, Egerhazi A, Nagy M, Krogsgaard Bording M, Ostermark Sørensen H, et al. The development and evaluation of a five-language multi-perspective standardised measure: Clinical Decision-making Involvement and Satisfaction (CDIS). 2013, In submission.
35. Konrad J, Loos S, Slade M, Jordan H, Giacco D, De Rosa C, Egerhazi A, Nagy M, Krogsgaard Bording M, Ostermark Sørensen H, et al. A five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making in the routine care of people with severe mental illness. 2013, In submission.
36. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005, 8:94-104. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x, 15804318.
37. Barbour R, Kitzinger J. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice 1999, London: Sage.
38. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995, 311:299-302.
39. Krueger RA, Casey MA, . Focus Groups A Practical Guide for Applied Research 2008, London: Sage, Focus Groups.
40. Loos S, Neumann P, Arnold K, Slade M, Fiorillo A, Frøkjær Krogsgaard Bording M, Ivanka T, Kawohl W, Puschner B. Gemeinsame Entscheidungsfindung in der Behandlung von Patienten mit schweren psychischen Erkrankungen: Eine Fokusgruppen-Untersuchung [Shared decision-making in the treatment of people with severe mental illness: a focus group study]. Psychiatrische Praxis 2013, 40:23-29.
41. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Clinical Version (SCID-CV) 1997, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
42. Möller HJ, Jäger M, Riedel M, Obermeier M, Strauss A, Bottlender R. The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: assessing courses, types and time stability of diagnostic classification. Eur Psychiatr 2010, 26:231-243.
43. Slade M, Cahill S, Kelsey W, Leese M, Powell R. Threshold 4: an evaluation of the Threshold Assessment Grid as an aid to mental health referrals. Primary Care Mental Health 2003, 1:45-54.
44. Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2006, 40:972-980. 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01921.x, 17054565.
45. Weeks G, Slade M, Hayward M. A UK validation of the Stages of Recovery Instrument. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2011, 57:446-454. 10.1177/0020764010365414, 20378660.
46. Iacobucci D, Duhachek A. Advancing alpha: measuring reliability with confidence. J Consumer Psychol 2003, 13:478-487.
47. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 1978, New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 2012, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
49. De Vaus D. Surveys in social research 2002, London: Routledge.
50. Giersdorf N, Loh A, Bieber C, Caspari C, Deinzer A, Doering T, Eich W, Hamann J, Heesen C, Kasper J, et al. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung [Development and validation of assessment instruments for shared decision making]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2004, 47:969-976. 10.1007/s00103-004-0905-5, 15490085.