Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API)

Health Expectations

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 234-243

  Simon, Daniela ^a   Kriston, Levente ^b   Loh, Andreas ^a   Spies, Claudia ^c   Scheibler, Fueloep ^d   Wills, Celia ^e   Härter, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY IN HEALTH CARE IQWIG   (Germany)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

confirmatory factor analysis; measurement; patient preferences; validation study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; DECISION MAKING; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 77955332288     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. O'Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Légaré F et al. Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Affairs, 2007 26 : 716 725.
2. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992 45 : 941 950.
3. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Social Science and Medicine, 1998 47 : 329 339.
4. Auerbach SM. Do patients want control over their own health care? A review of measures, findings, and research issues. Journal of Health Psychology, 2001 6 : 191 203.
5. Kaplan RM, Frosch DL. Decision-making in medicine and health care. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005 1 : 525 556.
6. Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision-making: a narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006 60 : 102 114.
7. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Britten N. "Doing prescribing": how might clinicians work differently for better, safer care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2003 12 (Suppl. 1 i33 i36.
8. Gillespie R, Florin D, Gillam S. Changing Relationships: Findings from the Patient Involvement Project. London : King's Fund, 2002.
9. Krantz DS, Baum A, von Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980 5 : 977 990.
10. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision-making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1989 4 : 23 30.
11. Spies CD, Schulz CM, Weiss-Gerlach E et al. Preferences for shared decision-making in chronic pain patients compared with patients during a pre-medication visit. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2006 50 : 1019 1026.
12. Hamann J, Neuner B, Kasper J et al. Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions. Health Expectations, 2007 10 : 358 863.
13. Hashimoto H, Fukuhara S. The influence of locus of control on preferences for information and decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 2003 55 : 236 240.
14. Cyran EM, Crane LA, Palmer L. Physician sex and other factors associated with type of breast cancer surgery in older women. Archives of Surgery, 2001 136 : 185 191. (Pubitemid 32143842)
15. Schouten BC, Eijkman MA, Hoogstraten J. Information and participation preferences of dental patients. Journal of Dental Research, 2004 83 : 961 965.
16. Ishikawa H, Hashimoto H, Yano E. Patients' preferences for decision-making and the feeling of being understood in the medical encounter among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2006 55 : 878 883.
17. Neuner B, Dizner-Golab A, Gentilello LM et al. Trauma patients' desire for autonomy in medical decision-making is impaired by smoking and hazardous alcohol consumption - a bi-national study. Journal of International Medical Research, 2007 35 : 609 614.
18. Nomura K, Ohno M, Fujinuma Y, Ishikawa H. Patient autonomy preferences among hypertensive outpatients in a primary care setting in Japan. Internal Medicine, 2007 46 : 1403 1408.
19. Neuner B, Spies C, Miller P et al. Unobserved heterogeneity in trauma patients' desire for autonomy in medical decision-making in an emergency department. Medical Science Monitor, 2008 14 : 366 371.
20. Giersdorf N, Loh A, Bieber C et al. Development and validation of assessment instruments for shared decision-making. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 2004 47 : 969 976.
21. Härter M, Loh A, Spies C. Gemeinsam entscheiden - erfolgreich behandeln. Köln : Deutscher Ärzteverlag, 2005.
22. Steffen P. Patientenzufriedenheit als Zielgröße für das strategische Krankenhausmanagement. In : Pfaff H, Lütticke J, Badura B, Piekarski C, Richter P (eds) "Weiche" Kennzahlen für das strategische Krankenhausmanagement. Stakeholder-Interessen zielgerichtet erkennen und einbeziehen. Göttingen : Verlag Hans Huber, 2004 : 85 108.
23. Loh A, Kremer N, Giersdorf N et al. Information and participation interests of patients with depression in clinical decision-making in primary care. Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitä tssicherung, 2004 98 : 101 107.
24. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York : Guilford Press, 1998.
25. Byrne BM. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
26. Kriston L, Gunzler C, Harms A, Berner M. Confirmatory factor analysis of the German version of the international index of erectile function (IIEF): a comparison of four models. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2008 5 : 92 99.
27. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 1999 6 : 1 55.
28. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.
29. Schafer JL. NORM: Multiple Imputation of Incomplete Multivariate Data under a Normal Model [Computer Software]. University Park : Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, 1999.
30. Scheibler F, Freise D, Pfaff H. Die Einbeziehung von Patienten in die Behandlung. Validierung der deutschen PICS-Skalen. Journal of Public Health, 2004 12 : 199 209.
31. Simon D, Loh A, Härter M. Die Entwicklung und Evaluation von Interventionen zur Förderung Partizipativer Entscheidungsfindung - Rahmenkonzept und Messinstrumente Zeitschrift für Medizinische. Psychologie, 2008 17 : 149 159.
32. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In : Bollen KA, Long JS (eds Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park : Sage, 1993 : 445 455.
33. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online, 2003 8 : 23 74.