Systems biology and " omics" tools: A cooperation for next-generation mycorrhizal studies

Plant Science

Volumn 203-204, Issue , 2013, Pages 107-114

  Salvioli, Alessandra ^a   Bonfante, Paola ^a  

^a Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Mycorrhiza; Networking; Next generation sequencing; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AGRICULTURE; BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW; SOIL; SYMBIOSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

AGRICULTURE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOMICS; MYCORRHIZAE; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SYMBIOSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84873160826     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.01.001     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Schüssler A., Schwarzott D., Walker C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105:1413-1421.
2. Smith S.E., Read D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2008, Academic Press, New York.
3. Bonfante P., Genre A. Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant-fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1. 10.1038/ncomms1046.
4. Javot H., Pumplin N., Harrison M.J. Phosphate in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: transport properties and regulatory roles. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:310-322.
5. Jakobsen I., Rosendahl L. Carbon flow into soil and external hyphae from roots of mycorrhizal cucumber plants. New Phytol. 1990, 115:77-83.
6. Pozo M.J., Azcón-Aguilar C. Unravelling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:393-398.
7. Wu Q.S., Xia R.X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163:417-425.
8. Leyval C., Joner E.J., del Val C., Haselwandter K. Potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for bioremediation. Mycorrhizal Technology in Agriculture 2002, 175-186. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland. S. Gianinazzi, H. Schuepp, J.M. Barea, K. Haselwandter (Eds.).
9. Degens B.P., Sparling G.P., Abbott L.K. Increasing the length of hyphae in a sandy soil increases the amount of water-stable aggregates. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1996, 3:149-159.
10. Hart M.M., Forsythe J.A. Using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve the nutrient quality of crops; nutritional benefits in addition to phosphorus. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 148:206-214.
11. Miransari M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen uptake. Arch. Microbiol. 2011, 193:77-81.
12. Tian C., et al. Regulation of the nitrogen transfer pathway in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: gene characterization and the coordination of expression with nitrogen flux. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153:1175-1187.
13. Guether M., et al. A mycorrhizal-specific ammonium transporter from Lotus japonicus acquires nitrogen released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Physiol. 2009, 1:73-83.
14. van der Heijden M.G. Mycorrhizal fungi reduce nutrient loss from model grassland ecosystems. Ecology 2010, 91:1163-1171.
15. Akiyama K., Matsuzaki K., Hayashi H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 2005, 435:824-827.
16. Besserer A., et al. Strigolactones stimulate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by activating mitochondria. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040226.
17. Bouwmeester H.J., Roux C., Lopez-Raez J.A., Bécard G. Rhizosphere communication of plants, parasitic plants and AM fungi. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:224-230.
18. Kapulnik Y., et al. Strigolactones affect lateral root formation and root-hair elongation in Arabidopsis. Planta 2011, 233:209-216.
19. Maillet F., et al. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 2011, 469:58-63.
20. Gough C., Cullimore J. Lipo-chitooligosaccharide signaling in endosymbiotic plant-microbe interactions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24:867-878.
21. Harrison M.J. Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59:19-42.
22. Parniske M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6:763-775.
23. Bonfante P., Requena N. Dating in the dark: how roots respond to fungal signals to establish arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:451-457.
24. Bucher M. Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. New Phytol. 2007, 173:11-26.
25. Kiers E.T., et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 2011, 333:880-882.
26. Smith S.E., Smith F.A. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62:227-250.
27. Liu J., et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is accompanied by local and systemic alterations in gene expression and an increase in disease resistance in the shoots. Plant J. 2007, 50:529-544.
28. Czaja L.F., et al. Transcriptional responses toward diffusible signals from symbiotic microbes reveal MtNFP- and MtDMI3-dependent reprogramming of host gene expression by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal lipochitooligosaccharides. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159:1671-1685.
29. Dumbrell A.J. Distinct seasonal assemblages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi revealed by massively parallel pyrosequencing. New Phytol. 2011, 190:794-804.
30. Verbruggen E., et al. Community assembly, species richness and nestedness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural soils. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21:2341-2353.
31. Lumini E., Orgiazzi A., Borriello R., Bonfante P., Bianciotto V. Disclosing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biodiversity in soil through a land-use gradient using a pyrosequencing approach. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:2165-2179.
32. Schoch C.L., et al. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6241-6246.
33. Gianinazzi S., et al. Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20:519-530.
34. Lekberg Y., Koide R.T. Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003. New Phytol. 2005, 168:189-204.
35. Borriello R., Lumini E., Girlanda M., Bonfante P., Bianciotto V. Effects of different management practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in maize fields by a molecular approach. Biol. Fertility Soils 2012, 48:911-922.
36. Ijdo M., Cranenbrouck S., Declerck S. Methods for large-scale production of AM fungi: past, present, and future. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21:1-16.
37. Stockinger H., Krüger M., Schüssler A. DNA barcoding of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2010, 187:461-474.
38. Berg G. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:11-18.
39. Hoeksema J.D., et al. A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:394-407.
40. Wang X., Pan Q., Fengxian C., Yan X., Liao H. Effects of co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia on soybean growth as related to root architecture and availability of N and P. Mycorrhiza 2011, 21:173-181.
41. Malusa E., Sas-Paszt L., Ciesielska J. Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. The Sci. World J. 2012, 10.1100/2012/491206.
42. Verbruggen E., van der Heijden M.G., Rillig M.C., Kiers E.T. Mycorrhizal fungal establishment in agricultural soils: factors determining inoculation success. New Phytol. 2012, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04348.x.
43. Veiga R.S.L., Jansa J., Frossard E., van der Heijden M.G.A. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce the growth of agricultural weeds?. PLoS One 2011, 6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027825.
44. Giovannetti M., et al. Nutraceutical value and safety of tomato fruits produced by mycorrhizal plants. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107:242-251.
45. Baslam M., Garmendia I., Goicoechea N. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved growth and nutritional quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59:5504-5515.
46. Wagg C., Jansa J., Schmid B., van der Heijden M.G.A. Belowground biodiversity effects of plant symbionts support aboveground productivity. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1001-1009.
47. Gao X., et al. Co-inoculation with rhizobia and AMF inhibited soybean red crown rot: from field study to plant defense-related gene expression analysis. PLoS One 2012, 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033977.
48. Sikes B.A., Powell J.R., Rillig M.C. Deciphering the relative contributions of multiple functions within plant-microbe symbioses. Ecology 2010, 91:1591-1597.
49. López-Ráez J.A., et al. Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:2589-2601.
50. Veresoglou S.D., Menexes G., Rillig M.C. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect the allometric partition of host plant biomass to shoots and roots? A meta-analysis of studies from 1990 to 2010. Mycorrhiza 2012, 22:227-235.
51. Metzker M.L. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:31-46.
52. Mardis E.R. A decade's perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature 2011, 470:198-203.
53. Xu Y., et al. Next-gen sequencing of the transcriptome of triticale. Plant Genetic Resources 2011, 9:181-184.
54. Wang Z., Gerstein M., Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:57-63.
55. Schliesky S., Gowik U., Weber A.P., Bräutigam A. RNA-Seq assembly - are we there yet?. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00220.
56. Brooks M.J., Rajasimha H.K., Roger J.E., Swaroop A. Next-generation sequencing facilitates quantitative analysis of wild-type and Nrl(-/-) retinal transcriptomes. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17:3034-3054.
57. Su Z., et al. Comparing next-generation sequencing and microarray technologies in a toxicological study of the effects of aristolochic acid on rat kidneys. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 19:1486-1493.
58. Kogenaru S., Qing Y., Guo Y., Wang N. RNA-seq and microarray complement each other in transcriptome profiling. BMC Genomics 2012, 15. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-629.
59. C.T. Brown, A. Howe, Q. Zhang, A.B. Pyrkosz, T.H. Brom, Reference-free algorithm for computational normalization of shotgun sequencing data, e-p-r-i-n-t ar-X-iv:1203. 4802 (2012), doi:2012Xiv1203.4802T.
60. Meaburn E., Schulz R. Next generation sequencing in epigenetics: insights and challenges. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23:192-199.
61. Mao W., Li Z., Xia X., Li Y., Yu J. A combined approach of high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis reveals tissue specific expression of microRNAs and their targets in cucumber. PLoS One 2012, 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033040.
62. Thompson J.F., Milos P.M. The properties and applications of single-molecule DNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 2011, 12. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-217.
63. Brouwer R.W., van den Hout M.C., Grosveld F.G., van Ijcken W.F. NARWHAL a primary analysis pipeline for NGS data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:284-285.
64. Lohse M., et al. RobiNA: a user-friendly, integrated software solution for RNA-Seq-based transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40. 10.1093/nar/gks540.
65. Schulz M.H., Zerbino D.R., Vingron M., Birney E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1086-1092.
66. Weckwerth W. Green systems biology - from single genomes, proteomes and metabolomes to ecosystems research and biotechnology. J. Proteom. 2011, 75:284-305.
67. Bombarely A., et al. A draft genome sequence of Nicotiana benthamiana to enhance molecular plant-microbe biology research. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 1523-1530.
68. Yang H., et al. Application of next-generation sequencing for rapid marker development in molecular plant breeding: a case study on anthracnose disease resistance in Lupinus angustifolius L. BMC Genom. 2012, 13. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-318.
69. Tomato Genome Consortium, The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution, Nature 485 (2012) 635-641.
70. Michael T.P., Alba R. The tomato genome fleshed out. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:765-767.
71. Grigoriev I.V., et al. Fueling the future with fungal genomics. Mycology 2011, 2:192-209.
72. Martin F., et al. The genome sequence of the basidiomycete fungus Laccaria bicolor provides insights into the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 2008, 452:88-92.
73. Martin F., et al. Perigord black truffle genome uncovers evolutionary origins and mechanisms of symbiosis. Nature 2010, 464:1033-1038.
74. Tisserant E., et al. The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont. New Phytol. 2012, 193:755-769.
75. Lee J., Young J.P. The mitochondrial genome sequence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices isolate 494 and implications for the phylogenetic placement of Glomus. New Phytol. 2009, 183:200-211.
76. Pelin A., et al. The mitochondrial genome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarita reveals two unsuspected trans-splicing events of group I introns. New Phytol. 2012, 194:345-836.
77. Ghignone S., et al. The genome of the obligate endobacterium of an AM fungus reveals an interphylum network of nutritional interactions. ISME J. 2012, 6:136-145.
78. Liu Z., et al. Metatranscriptomic analyses of chlorophototrophs of a hot-spring microbial mat. ISME J. 2011, 5:1279-1290.
79. Damon C., et al. Metatranscriptomics reveals the diversity of genes expressed by eukaryotes in forest soils. PLoS One 2012, 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028967.
80. Kitano H. Computational systems biology. Nature 2002, 420:206-210.
81. Aderem A. Systems biology: its practice and challenges. Cell 2005, 121:511-513.
82. Butts C.T. Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 2009, 325:414-416.
83. Keurentjes J.J., et al. Redefining plant systems biology: from cell to ecosystem. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:183-190.
84. MacLean D., et al. Evidence for large complex networks of plant short silencing RNAs. PLoS One 2010, 5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009901.
85. Cheng C., et al. Construction and analysis of an integrated regulatory network derived from high-throughput sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002190.
86. Dumas M.E. Metabolome 2.0: quantitative genetics and network biology of metabolic phenotypes. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8:2494-2502.
87. Ideker T., Krogan N.J. Differential network biology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8. 10.1038/msb.2011.99.
88. Osorio S., et al. Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:405-425.
89. Rohrmann J., et al. Combined transcription factor profiling, microarray analysis and metabolite profiling reveals the transcriptional control of metabolic shifts occurring during tomato fruit development. Plant J. 2011, 68:999-1013.
90. Carrera J., et al. Fine-tuning tomato agronomic properties by computational genome redesign. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002528.
91. Weckwerth W. Green systems biology - from single genomes, proteomes and metabolomes to ecosystems research and biotechnology. J. Proteomics 2011, 75:284-305.
92. Lucas M., Laplaze L., Bennett M.J. Plant systems biology: network matters. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:535-553.
93. Weston D.J., Hanson P.J., Norby R.J., Tuskan G.A., Wullschleger S.D. From systems biology to photosynthesis and whole-plant physiology: a conceptual model for integrating multi-scale networks. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7:260-262.
94. Pritchard L., Birch P. A systems biology perspective on plant-microbe interactions: biochemical and structural targets of pathogen effectors. Plant Sci. 2011, 180:584-603.
95. Fiorilli V., et al. Global and cell-type gene expression profiles in tomato plants colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol. 2009, 184:975-987.
96. Devers E.A., Branscheid A., May P., Krajinski F. Stars and symbiosis: microRNA- and microRNA*-mediated transcript cleavage involved in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:1990-2010.
97. Bazin J., Bustos-Sanmamed P., Hartmann C., Lelandais-Brière C., Crespi M. Complexity of miRNA-dependent regulation in root symbiosis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2012, 367:1570-1579.
98. Hao Z., et al. Local and systemic mycorrhiza-induced protection against the ectoparasitic nematode Xiphinema index involves priming of defence gene responses in grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:3657-3672.
99. Branscheid A., Devers E.A., May P., Krajinski F. Distribution pattern of small RNA and degradome reads provides information on miRNA gene structure and regulation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:1609-1611.
100. Rodriguez-Llorente I., et al. The Symbiosis Interactome: a computational approach reveals novel components, functional interactions and modules in Sinorhizobium meliloti. BMC Syst. Biol. 2009, 16. 10.1186/1752-0509-3-63.
101. Fasoli M., et al. The grapevine expression atlas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a maturation program. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3489-3505.
102. He J., et al. The Medicago truncatula gene expression atlas web server. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-441.
103. Yang S.Y., et al. Nonredundant regulation of rice arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by two members of the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1 gene family. Plant Cell 2012, 19. 10.1105/tpc.112.104901.
104. Salvioli A., Zouari I., Chalot M., Bonfante P. The arbuscular mycorrhizal status has an impact on the transcriptome profile and amino acid composition of tomato fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-44.
105. Huang S. Back to the biology in systems biology: what can we learn from biomolecular networks?. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2004, 2:279-297.
106. Liu J., et al. Transcript profiling coupled with spatial expression analyses reveals genes involved in distinct developmental stages of an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2106-2123.
107. Taylor J., Harrier L.A. Expression studies of plant genes differentially expressed in leaf and root tissues of tomato colonised by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 51:619-629.
108. Küster H., et al. Construction and validation of cDNA-based Mt6k-RIT macro- and microarrays to explore root endosymbioses in the model legume Medicago truncatula. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 108:95-113.
109. Frenzel A., et al. Combined transcriptome profiling reveals a novel family of arbuscular mycorrhizal-specific Medicago truncatula lectin genes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18:771-782.
110. Güimil S., et al. Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:8066-8070.
111. Hohnjec N., Vieweg M.F., Pühler A., Becker A., Küster H. Overlaps in the transcriptional profiles of Medicago truncatula roots inoculated with two different Glomus fungi provide insights into the genetic program activated during arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137:1283-1301.
112. Deguchi Y., et al. Transcriptome profiling of Lotus japonicus roots during arbuscular mycorrhiza development and comparison with that of nodulation. DNA Res. 2007, 14:117-133.
113. Siciliano V., et al. Transcriptome analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal roots during development of the prepenetration apparatus. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144:1455-1466.
114. Gomez S.K., et al. Medicago truncatula and Glomus intraradices gene expression in cortical cells harboring arbuscules in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-10.
115. Guether M., et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of regulatory networks, transport, cell wall and membrane biogenesis during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Lotus japonicus. New Phytol. 2009, 182:200-212.
116. Hogekamp C., et al. Laser microdissection unravels cell-type-specific transcription in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots, including CAAT-box transcription factor gene expression correlating with fungal contact and spread. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:2023-2043.
117. Gaude N., Bortfeld S., Duensing N., Lohse M., Krajinski F. Arbuscule-containing and non-colonized cortical cells of mycorrhizal roots undergo a massive and specific reprogramming during arbuscular mycorrhizal development. The Plant J. 2012, 69:510-528.
118. Campos-Soriano L., García-Martínez J., San Segundo B. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis promotes the systemic induction of regulatory defence-related genes in rice leaves and confers resistance to pathogen infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13:579-592.
119. Ortu G., et al. Plant genes related to gibberellin biosynthesis and signaling are differentially regulated during the early stages of AM fungal interactions. Mol. Plant. 2012, 5:951-954.