A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi

Ecology Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 394-407

  Hoeksema, Jason D ^a   Chaudhary, V Bala ^b   Gehring, Catherine A ^b   Johnson, Nancy Collins ^b   Karst, Justine ^a   Koide, Roger T ^c   Pringle, Anne ^d   Zabinski, Catherine ^e   Bever, James D ^f   Moore, John C ^g   Wilson, Gail W T ^h   Klironomos, John N ⁱ   Umbanhowar, James ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory   (United States)

^h OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizas; Ectomycorrhizas; Inoculation; Meta analysis; Nitrogen; Phosphorous; Plant functional group; Soil microorganisms; Symbiosis

Indexed keywords

ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA; BIODIVERSITY; C4 PLANT; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; HOST PLANT; INOCULATION; META-ANALYSIS; MODEL TEST; MUTUALISM; NITROGEN; PARASITISM; PHOSPHORUS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SOIL FERTILITY; SOIL MICROORGANISM; WOODY PLANT;

ECOLOGY; FUNGUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; META ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; MYCORRHIZA; NITROGEN FIXATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW; SYMBIOSIS;

ECOLOGY; FUNGI; MYCORRHIZAE; NITROGEN FIXATION; PLANTS; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SYMBIOSIS;

ARBUSCULAR; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FUNGI; POACEAE;

EID: 77949907989     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Bethlenfalvay GJ, Pacovsky RS, Bayne HG, Stafford AE. Interactions between nitrogen-fixation, mycorrhizal colonization, and host-plant growth in the Phaseolus-Rhizobium-Glomus symbiosis. Plant Physiol. 1982, 70:446-450.
2. Bethlenfalvay GJ, Brown MS, Stafford AE. Glycine-Glomus-Rhizobium symbiosis II. Antagonistic effects between mycorrhizal colonization and nodulation. Plant Physiol. 1985, 79:1054-1058.
3. Bonkowski M, Villenave C, Griffiths B. Rhizosphere fauna: the functional and structural diversity of intimate interactions of soil fauna with plant roots. Plant Soil 2009, 321:213-233.
4. Borowicz VA. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant-pathogen relations? Ecology 2001, 82:3057-3068.
5. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology 2008, 96:18-34.
6. Brundrett MC. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytol. 2002, 154:275-304.
7. Brundrett MC. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 2009, 320:37-77.
8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer Science/Business Media/LLC, New York, NY
9. Chapin FS. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1980, 11:233-260.
10. Chatfield C. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 1995, 158:419-466.
11. Chaudhary VB, Walters L, Bever JD, Hoeksema JD, Wilson GWT. Advancing synthetic ecology: a database system to facilitate complex ecological meta-analyses. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 2010
12. Finlay RD. Interactions between soil microarthro-pods and endomycorrhizal associations of higher plants. Ecological Interactions in Soils: Plants, Microbes, and Animals 1985, 319-333. Fitter AHAtkinson DRead DJUsher MB. In, eds, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp
13. Fitter AH, Garbaye J. Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and other soil organsisms. Plant Soil 1994, 159:123-132.
14. Francis R, Read DJ. Mutualism and atagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis, with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Can. J. Bot. 1995, 73(Suppl. 1):S1301-S1309.
15. Frey-Klett P, Garbaye J, Tarkka M. The mycorrhiza helper bacteria revisited. New Phytol. 2007, 176:22-36.
16. Garbaye J, Bowen GD. Effect of different microflora on the success of ectomycorrhizal inoculation of Pinus radiata. Can. J. For. Res. 1987, 17:941-943.
17. Gehring C, Bennett A. Mycorrhizal fungal-plant-insect interactions: the importance of a community approach. Environ. Entomol. 2009, 38:93-102.
18. Gosling P, Hodge A, Goodlass G, Bending GD. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 113:17-35.
19. Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ. Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 1987, 328:420-422.
20. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analysis. Ecology 1999, 80:1142-1149.
21. Halpern BS, Silliman BR, Olden JD, Bruno JP, Bertness MD. Incorporating positive interactions in aquatic restoration and conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:153-160.
22. Harris J. Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 2009, 325:573-574.
23. Hart MM, Reader RJ. Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2002, 153:335-344.
24. Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT. Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 1999, 80:1187-1195.
25. Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT. The role of mycorrhizas in plant community structure and dynamics: lessons from grasslands. Plant Soil 2002, 244:319-331.
26. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, Orlando
27. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 1999, 80:1150-1156.
28. van der Heijden MGA. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a determinant of plant diversity: in search for underlying mechanisms and general principles. Mycorrhizal Ecology 2002, 243-266. van der Heijden MGASanders IR. In, eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp
29. van der Heijden MGA, Horton TR. Socialism in soil? The importance of mycorrhizal fungal networks for facilitation in natural ecosystems. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:1139-1150.
30. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 1998, 396:69-72.
31. Hobbie EA, Agerer R. Nitrogen isotopes in ectomycorrhizal sporocarps correspond to belowground exploration types. Plant Soil 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0032, DOI:
32. Hoeksema JD, Piculell B, Thompson JN. Within-population genetic variability in mycorrhizal interactions. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2009, 2:110-112.
33. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat. Med. 2002, 21:589-624.
34. Johnson NC. Tansley review: resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytol. 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0032, DOI:
35. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA. Functioning of mycorrhizas along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol. 1997, 135:1-12.
36. Johnson NC, Rowland DL, Corkidi L, Egerton- Warburton LM, Allen EB. Nitrogen enrichment alters mycorrhizal allocation at five mesic to semiarid grasslands. Ecology 2003, 84:1895-1908.
37. Jones MD, Smith SE. Exploring functional definitions of mycorrhizas: are mycorrhizas always mutualisms? Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82:1089-1109.
38. Karst J, Marczak L, Jones MD, Turkington R. The mutualism-parasitism continuum in ectomycorrhizas: a quantitative assessment using meta-analysis. Ecology 2008, 89:1032-1042.
39. Kiers ET, West SA, Denison RF. Mediating mutualisms: farm management practices and evolutionary changes in symbiont co-operation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 39:745-754.
40. Klironomos JN. Variation in plant response to native and exotic mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 2003, 84:2292-2301.
41. Kobayashi DY, Crouch JA. Bacterial/Fungal Interactions: from Pathogens to Mutualistic Endosymbionts. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009, 47:63-82.
42. Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM. The vegetation N: P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology 1996, 33:1441-1450.
43. Koide RT. Nutrient supply, nutrient demand and plant response to mycorrhizal infection. New Phytol. 1991, 117:365-386.
44. Koide RT. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and plant reproduction. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function 2000, 19-46. Kapulnik YDouds DD. In, eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, pp
45. Lekberg Y, Koide RT. Is plant performance limited by abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis of studies published between 1988 and 2003. New Phytol. 2005, 168:189-204.
46. Linderman RG. Mycorrhizal interactions with the rhizosphere microflora: the mycorrhizosphere effect. Phytopathology 1988, 78:366-371.
47. Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI. Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 2004, 107:433-438.
48. Mack KML, Rudgers JA. Balancing multiple mutualists: asymmetric interactions among plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and fungal endophytes. Oikos 2008, 117:310-320.
49. Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Valladares F, Lortie CJ. Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:199-205.
50. Maherali H, Klironomos JN. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science 2007, 316:1746-1748.
51. Marschner H, Dell B. Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 1994, 159:89-102.
52. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:178-185.
53. McGonigle TP. A numerical analysis of published field trials with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Funct. Ecol. 1988, 2:473-478.
54. Modjo HS, Hendrix JW, Nesmith WC. Mycorrhizal fungi in relation to control of tobacco stunt disease with soil fumigants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1987, 19:289-295.
55. Moore JC, McCann K, Setala H, De Ruiter PC. Top-down is bottom-up: does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? Ecology 2003, 84:846-857.
56. Morris WF, Hufbauer RA, Agrawal AA, Bever JD, Borowicz VA, Gilbert GS. Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 2007, 88:1021-1029.
57. Munkvold L, Kjoller R, Vestberg M, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I. High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2004, 164:357-364.
58. Newman EI. Mycorrhizal links between plants - their functioning and ecological significance. Adv.Ecol. Res. 1988, 18:243-270.
59. Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR. Arbuscular mycorrhiza protect an annual grass from root pathogenic fungi in the field. J. Ecol. 1995, 83:991-1000.
60. Piculell BJ, Hoeksema JD, Thompson JN. Interactions of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis, and the potential for selection mosaics. BMC Biol. 2008, 6. 11 pages
61. Pringle A, Bever JD. Analogous effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the laboratory and a North Carolina field. New Phytol. 2008, 180:162-175.
62. Puschel D, Rydlova J, Vosatka M. The development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in two simulated stages of spoil-bank succession. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2007, 35:363-369.
63. Requena N, Jeffries P, Barea JM. Assessment of natural mycorrhizal potential in a desertified semiarid ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62:842-847.
64. Rillig MC. Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:740-754.
65. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. Metawin Version 2.0: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis 2000, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
66. Scervino JM, Gottlieb A, Silvani VA, Pergola M, Fernandez L, Godeas AM. Exudates of dark septate endophyte (DSE) modulate the development of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Gigaspora rosea. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41:1753-1756.
67. Schwartz MW, Hoeksema JD. Specialization and resource trade: biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology (Washington DC) 1998, 79:1029-1038.
68. Simard SW, Durall DM. Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82:1140-1165.
69. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2008, 3rd edn, Academic Press, Amsterdam
70. Stribley DP, Tinker PB, Rayner JH. Relation of internal phosphorus concentrations and plant weight in plants infected by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 1980, 86:261-266.
71. Treseder KK. A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytol. 2004, 164:347-355. , 164, 347-355
72. Vogelsang KM, Reynolds HL, Bever JD. Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system. New Phytol. 2006, 172:554-562.
73. Warnock AJ, Fitter AH, Usher MB. The influence of a springtail Folsomia candida (Insecta: Collembola) on the mycorrhizal association of Leek, Allium porum and the vesicular-arbusuclar endophyte Glomus fasiculatus. New Phytol. 1982, 90:285-292.
74. Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol. 2006, 75:1182-1189.
75. Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC. Interspecific variation in plant responses to mycorrhizal colonization in tallgrass prairie. Am. J. Bot. 1998, 85:1732-1738.