A survey of dominant mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 84-91

  Meinke, David W ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARABIDOPSIS; CLASSIFICATION; DOMINANT GENE; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW;

ALLELES; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; GENES, DOMINANT; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 84873156120     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (115)

1. Lloyd J., Meinke D. A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:1115-1129.
2. Meinke D., et al. Identifying essential genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:483-491.
3. Muralla R., et al. Molecular foundations of reproductive lethality in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2011, 12:e28398.
4. Muller H.J. Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics (Vol. 1) 1932, 213-255. D.F. Jones (Ed.).
5. Veitia R.A. Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. Bioessays 2002, 24:175-184.
6. Veitia R.A., Birchler J.A. Dominance and gene dosage balance in health and disease: why levels matter!. J. Pathol. 2009, 220:174-185.
7. Cook D.L., et al. Modeling stochastic gene expression: Implications for haploinsufficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:15641-15646.
8. Dang V.T., et al. Identification of human haploinsufficient genes and their genomic proximity to segmental duplications. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 16:1350-1357.
9. Huang N., et al. Characterising and predicting haploinsufficiency in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001154.
10. Cook R.K., et al. The generation of chromosomal deletions to provide extensive coverage and subdivision of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Biol. 2012, 13:R21.
11. Marygold S.J., et al. The ribosomal protein genes and Minute loci of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R216.
12. Deutschbauer A.M., et al. Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast. Genetics 2005, 169:1915-1925.
13. Delneri D., et al. Identification and characterization of high-flux-control genes of yeast through competition analyses in continuous cultures. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:113-117.
14. Conrad D.F., et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 2009, 464:704-712.
15. Jimenez-Sanchez G., et al. Human disease genes. Nature 2001, 409:853-855.
16. Jabbi M., et al. The Williams syndrome chromosome 7q11.23 hemideletion confers hypersocial, anxious personality coupled with altered insula structure and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E860-E866.
17. de Clare M., et al. Haploinsufficiency and the sex chromosomes from yeasts to humans. BMC Biol. 2011, 9:15.
18. Byrne M.E. A role for the ribosome in development. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:512-519.
19. Weijers D., et al. An Arabidopsis Minute-like phenotype caused by a semi-dominant mutation in a RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S5 gene. Development 2001, 128:4289-4299.
20. Berg M., et al. Requirement of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for gametogenesis and embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 44:866-878.
21. Li J., et al. A role for auxin response factor 19 in auxin and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:899-908.
22. Scortecci K.D., et al. Identification of a MADS-box gene, FLOWERING LOCUS M, that represses flowering. Plant J. 2001, 26:229-236.
23. Gan Y., et al. GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS modulates the regulation by gibberellins of epidermal differentiation and shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1383-1395.
24. Robson F., et al. Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering-time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. Plant J. 2001, 28:619-631.
25. Conklin P.L., et al. Environmental stress sensitivity of an ascorbic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:9970-9974.
26. Zhang Z., et al. The gene controlling the quantitative trait locus EPITHIOSPECIFIER MODIFIER1 alters glucosinolate hydrolysis and insect resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1524-1536.
27. Zhu Y., et al. Agrobacterium-mediated root transformation is inhibited by mutation of an Arabidopsis cellulose synthase-like gene. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133:1000-1010.
28. Pogson B., et al. Arabidopsis carotenoid mutants demonstrate that lutein is not essential for photosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1627-1639.
29. Vert G., et al. IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 2002, 14:1223-1233.
30. Kovacheva S., et al. In vivo studies on the roles of Tic110, Tic40, and Hsp93 during chloroplast protein import. Plant J. 2005, 41:412-428.
31. Kimura M., Kagawa T. Blue light-induced chloroplast avoidance and phototropic responses exhibit distinct dose dependency of PHOTOTROPIN2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85:1260-1264.
32. Yi H., et al. Constitutive expression exposes functional redundancy between the Arabidopsis histone H2A gene HTA1 and other H2A gene family members. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1575-1589.
33. Li X.P., et al. Molecular and global time-resolved analysis of a psbS gene dosage effect on pH- and xanthophyll cycle-dependent nonphotochemical quenching in photosystem II. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:33590-33597.
34. Ren G., et al. Identification of a novel chloroplast protein AtNYE1 regulating chlorophyll degradation during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144:1429-1441.
35. Koornneef M., et al. Genetic control of light-inhibited hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1980, 100:147-160.
36. Bruggemann E., et al. Analysis of fast neutron-generated mutants at the Arabidopsis thaliana HY4 locus. Plant J. 1996, 10:755-760.
37. Sozzani R., Benfey P.N. High-throughput phenotyping of multicellular organisms: finding the link between genotype and phenotype. Genome Biol. 2011, 12:219.
38. Feldmann K.A. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: mutational spectrum. Plant J. 1991, 1:71-82.
39. O'Malley R.C., Ecker J.R. Linking genotype to phenotype using the Arabidopsis unimutant collection. Plant J. 2010, 61:928-940.
40. ülker B., et al. Getting the most out of publicly available T-DNA insertion lines. Plant J. 2008, 56:665-677.
41. Weigel D., et al. Activation tagging in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122:1003-1013.
42. Ichikawa T., et al. Sequence database of 1172 T-DNA insertion sites in Arabidopsis activation-tagging lines that showed phenotypes in T1 generation. Plant J. 2003, 36:421-429.
43. Schneider A., et al. A transposon-based activation-tagging population in Arabidopsis thaliana (TAMARA) and its application in the identification of dominant developmental and metabolic mutations. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:4622-4628.
44. Koiwa H., et al. Identification of plant stress-responsive determinants in Arabidopsis by large-scale forward genetic screens. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:1119-1128.
45. Ahn J.H., et al. Isolation of 151 mutants that have developmental defects from T-DNA tagging. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:169-178.
46. Robinson S.J., et al. An archived activation tagged population of Arabidopsis thaliana to facilitate forward genetics approaches. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9:101.
47. Hyun Y., Lee I. KIDARI, encoding a non-DNA binding bHLH protein, represses light signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61:283-296.
48. Ren S., et al. TELOMERASE ACTIVATOR1 induces telomerase activity and potentiates responses to auxin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16:2910-2922.
49. Niwa Y., et al. Arabidopsis mutants by activation tagging in which photosynthesis genes are expressed in dedifferentiated calli. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47:319-331.
50. Yoo S.Y., et al. Control of flowering time and cold response by a NAC-domain protein in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e642.
51. Perrella G., et al. Histone hyperacetylation affects meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 62:796-806.
52. Ogawa M., et al. ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE1 (ADPG1), ADPG2, and QUARTET2 are polygalacturonases required for cell separation during reproductive development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:216-233.
53. Kim O.K., et al. An Arabidopsis F-box protein regulates tapetum degeneration and pollen maturation during anther development. Planta 2010, 232:353-366.
54. Yoshizumi T., et al. INCREASED LEVEL OF POLYPLOIDY1, a conserved repressor of CYCLINA2 transcription, controls endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2452-2468.
55. Mora-García S., et al. Nuclear protein phosphatases with Kelch-repeat domains modulate the response to brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:448-460.
56. van der Graaff E., et al. Activation tagging of the two closely linked genes LEP and VAS independently affects vascular cell number. Plant J. 2002, 32:819-830.
57. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815.
58. Palatnik J.F., et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425:257-263.
59. Williams L., et al. Regulation of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem and lateral organ formation by microRNA miR166g and its AtHD-ZIP target genes. Development 2005, 132:3657-3668.
60. Kondou Y., et al. RETARDED GROWTH OF EMBRYO1, a new basic helix-loop-helix protein, expresses in endosperm to control embryo growth. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:1924-1935.
61. Kakimoto T. CKI1, a histidine kinase homolog implicated in cytokinin signal transduction. Science 1996, 274:982-985.
62. Borghi L., et al. Arabidopsis JAGGED LATERAL ORGANS is expressed in boundaries and coordinates KNOX and PIN activity. Plant Cell 2007, 19:1795-1808.
63. Tzafrir I., et al. Identification of genes required for embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:1206-1220.
64. Uehara T., et al. Domain II mutations in CRANE/IAA18 suppress lateral root formation and affect shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:1025-1038.
65. Ploense S.E., et al. A gain-of-function mutation in IAA18 alters Arabidopsis embryonic apical patterning. Development 2009, 136:1509-1517.
66. Chinnusamy V., et al. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:1043-1054.
67. Kanaoka M.M., et al. SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 2008, 20:1775-1785.
68. McConnell J.R., et al. Role of PHABULOSA and PHAVOLUTA in determining radial patterning in shoots. Nature 2001, 411:709-713.
69. Mallory A.C., et al. MicroRNA control of PHABULOSA in leaf development: importance of pairing to the microRNA 5' region. EMBO J. 2004, 23:3356-3364.
70. Ochando I., et al. Mutations in the microRNA complementarity site of the INCURVATA4 gene perturb meristem function and adaxialize lateral organs in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:607-619.
71. Emery J.F., et al. Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1768-1774.
72. Zhong R., Ye Z.H. amphivasal vascular bundle 1, a gain-of-function mutation of the IFL1/REV gene, is associated with alterations in the polarity of leaves, stems, and carpels. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45:369-385.
73. Soppe W.J., et al. The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. Mol. Cell 2000, 6:791-802.
74. Stokes T.L., et al. Epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis disease resistance. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:171-182.
75. Zhang Y., et al. A gain-of-function mutation in a plant disease resistance gene leads to constitutive activation of downstream signal transduction pathways in suppressor of npr1-1, constitutive 1. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2636-2646.
76. Chiba Y., et al. Evidence for autoregulation of cystathionine gamma-synthase mRNA stability in Arabidopsis. Science 1999, 286:1371-1374.
77. Bender J., Fink G.R. A Myb homologue, ATR1, activates tryptophan gene expression in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:5655-5660.
78. Wu G., et al. KANADI1 regulates adaxial-abaxial polarity in Arabidopsis by directly repressing the transcription of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:16392-16397.
79. Casson S.A., Lindsey K. The turnip mutant of Arabidopsis reveals that LEAFY COTYLEDON1 expression mediates the effects of auxin and sugars to promote embryonic cell identity. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:526-541.
80. Berthomé R., et al. pur4 mutations are lethal to the male, but not the female, gametophyte and affect sporophyte development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:650-660.
81. ala is sufficient to confer auxin resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:1284-1290.
82. Chandler J.W., Werr W. When negative is positive in functional genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8:279-285.
83. Veitia R.A. Exploring the molecular etiology of dominant-negative mutations. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3843-3851.
84. Greenberg J.T. Positive and negative regulation of salicylic acid-dependent cell death and pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis lsd6 and ssi1 mutants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13:877-881.
85. Mollá-Morales A., et al. Analysis of ven3 and ven6 reticulate mutants reveals the importance of arginine biosynthesis in Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant J. 2011, 65:335-345.
86. Huang T., et al. Pleiotropic physiological consequences of feedback-insensitive phenylalanine biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010, 63:823-835.
87. Mourad G., King J. L-O-Methylthreonine-resistant mutant of Arabidopsis defective in isoleucine feedback regulation. Plant Physiol. 1995, 107:43-52.
88. Chen H., et al. Genetic analysis of pathway regulation for enhancing branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Plant J. 2010, 63:573-583.
89. Liscum E., Reed J.W. Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 49:387-400.
90. Yang X., et al. The IAA1 protein is encoded by ARF5 and is a substrate of SCF (TIR1). Plant J. 2004, 40:772-782.
91. Rinaldi M.A., et al. A gain-of-function mutation in IAA16 confers reduced responses to auxin and abscisic acid and impedes plant growth and fertility. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 79:359-373.
92. Ishida T., et al. Helical microtubule arrays in a collection of twisting tubulin mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:8544-8549.
93. Kato T., et al. Defects in dynamics and functions of actin filament in Arabidopsis caused by the dominant-negative actin fiz1-induced fragmentation of actin filament. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51:333-338.
94. Nishimura T., et al. An Arabidopsis ACT2 dominant-negative mutation, which disturbs F-actin polymerization, reveals its distinctive function in root development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44:1131-1140.
95. Yoder D.W., et al. Effects of mutations in Arabidopsis FtsZ1 on plastid division, FtsZ ring formation and positioning, and FtsZ filament morphology in vivo. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:775-791.
96. Desprez T., et al. Resistance against herbicide isoxaben and cellulose deficiency caused by distinct mutations in the same cellulose synthase isoform CESA6. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128:482-490.
97. Frankel N., et al. Morphological evolution caused by many subtle-effect substitutions in regulatory DNA. Nature 2011, 474:598-603.
98. Wang X., et al. A novel high-throughput in vivo molecular screen for shade avoidance mutants identifies a novel phyA mutation. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:2973-2987.
99. Exner V., et al. A gain-of-function mutation of Arabidopsis cryptochrome1 promotes flowering. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1633-1645.
100. Miyata K., et al. Suppression of late-flowering and semi-dwarf phenotypes in the Arabidopsis clock mutant lhy-12;cca1-101 by phB under continuous light. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:1162-1171.
101. Würschum T., et al. APETALA2 regulates the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Plant Cell 2006, 18:295-307.
102. Tagami Y., et al. A dominant mutation in DCL1 suppresses the hyl1 mutant phenotype by promoting the processing of miRNA. RNA 2009, 15:450-458.
103. Schauer S.E., et al. DICER-LIKE1: Blind men and elephants in Arabidopsis development. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7:487-491.
104. Bonaventure G., et al. A gain-of-function allele of TPC1 activates oxylipin biogenesis after leaf wounding in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 49:889-898.
105. Kim H.J., et al. Cytokinin-mediated control of leaf longevity by AHK3 through phosphorylation of ARR2 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:814-819.
106. Sijacic P., et al. Recessive antimorphic alleles overcome functionally redundant loci to reveal TSO1 function in Arabidopsis flowers and meristems. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002352.
107. White D.W.R. PEAPOD regulates lamina size and curvature in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:13238-13243.
108. El-Assal S.E.D., et al. A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29:435-440.
109. Huang X., et al. Epistatic natural allelic variation reveals a function of AGAMOUS-LIKE6 in axillary bud formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2364-2379.
110. Liu C., et al. A missense mutation in the VHYNP motif of a DELLA protein causes a semi-dwarf mutant phenotype in Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:249-258.
111. Dill A., et al. The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:14162-14167.
112. Todesco M., et al. Natural allelic variation underlying a major fitness trade-off in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2010, 465:632-636.
113. Lu H., et al. ACD6, a novel ankyrin protein, is a regulator and an effector of salicylic acid signaling in the Arabidopsis defense response. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2408-2420.
114. Alonso-Blanco C., et al. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation?. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1877-1896.
115. Weigel D. Natural variation in Arabidopsis: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:2-22.