The effect of observational learning on students' performance, processes, and motivation in two creative domains

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-28

  Groenendijk, Talita ^a   Janssen, Tanja ^a   Rijlaarsdam, Gert ^a   van den Bergh, Huub ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ART; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LITERATURE; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICS; STUDENT;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ART; CREATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOTIVATION; NETHERLANDS; POETRY AS TOPIC; PROBLEM SOLVING; SELF EFFICACY; STUDENTS;

EID: 84873147564     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: 20448279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02052.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
3. Anderson, A., & Yates, G. C. R. (1999). Clay modelling and social modeling: effects of interactive teaching on young children's creative art making. Educational Psychology, 19, 463-469.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
5. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2002). Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 405-415.
6. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 1-36.
7. Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H., & Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. (2006) What observational learning in writing courses entails: A multiple case study. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 6, 31-62.
8. Broekkamp, H., Janssen, T., & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Is there a relationship between literature reading and creative writing? Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 281-297.
9. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1986) 1989. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (ed), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, N.J. : Erlbaum.
10. Couzijn, M. (1999). Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: Effects on learning and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 9, 109-142.
11. Couzijn, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2004). Learning to read and write argumentative text by observation. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), G. Rijlaarsdam, H. Van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing. Vol. 14. Effective learning and teaching of writing (2nd ed.), Part 1, Studies in learning to write (pp. 241-258). Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. DAT (1984). Differentiële Aanleg Test [Differential Aptitude Test.] Lisse : Zwets & Zeitlinger.
13. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
14. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art New York : Wiley.
15. Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning and Instruction, 18, 54-65.
16. Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2005). Inputlog: A logging tool for the research of writing processes University of Antwerp, department of management, faculty of applied economics. Retrieved from http://www.ufsia.ac.be/~lvanwaes/publications.html
17. Mednick, S.A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
18. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
19. Raedts, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Van Waes, L., & Daems, F. (2007). Observational learning through video-based models: Impact on students' accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs, task knowledge and writing performances. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), & P. Boscolo, & S. Hidi (Vol Eds.), Studies in writing, Vol. 19, writing and motivation (pp. 219-238). Oxford : Elsevier
20. Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., Van Steendam, E., Toorenaar, A., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observation of peers in learning to write, practice and research. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 53-83.
21. Rourke, A., & Sweller, W. (2009). The worked-example effect using ill-defined problems: Learning to recognize designers' styles. Learning and Instruction, 19, 185-199.
22. Rummel, N. & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 201-241.
23. Runco, M. A. (2003). Critical creative processes Cresskill, NJ : Hampton.
24. Ruscio, J., Whitney, D.M. & Amabile, T.M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243-263.
25. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313-322.
26. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195-208.
27. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285-296.
28. Sonnenschein, S., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1984). Developing referential communication: A hierarchy of skills. Child Development, 55, 1936-1945.
29. Teyken, C. (1988). Ontwerpen als proces [Designing as a process] Amsterdam /Lisse : Swets & Zeitlinger.
30. Torrance, M., Fidalgo, R., & García, J. N. (2007). The teachability and effectiveness of cognitive self-regulation in sixth grade writers. Learning and Instruction, 17, 265-285.
31. Van den Bergh, H., & Eiting, M. H. (1989). A method of estimating rater reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 29-40.
32. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83-98.
33. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. G. (2006). Effects of process-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer performance. Learning and Instruction, 16, 154-164.
34. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. G. (2008). Effects of studying sequences of process oriented and product oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 18, 211-222.
35. Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 155-174.
36. Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., & Van den Bergh, H. (2010).The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL. Learning and Instruction, 20, 316-327.
37. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought New York : Harcourt Brace.
38. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002). Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 660-668.