Polyploidy influences sexual system and mating patterns in the moss Atrichum undulatum sensu lato

Annals of Botany

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 135-143

  Jesson, Linley K ^a   Cavanagh, Amanda P ^a   Perley, Danielle S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Atrichum undulatum; dioecy; geitonogamy; hermaphroditism; mosses; polyploidy; selfing rates; sexual system

Indexed keywords

ALLOZYME; DIOECY; DOMINANCE; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GEITONOGAMY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; HERMAPHRODITE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MOSS; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX RATIO;

ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; CANADA; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; INBREEDING; MOSS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENOME; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; TRIPLOIDY;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BRYOPHYTA; DIPLOIDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; HAPLOIDY; INBREEDING; NEW BRUNSWICK; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SEX RATIO; TRIPLOIDY;

ATRICHUM UNDULATUM; BRYOPHYTA;

EID: 78650592809     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq216     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen CE. 1935a. Genetics of bryophytes. Botanical Review 1: 269-291.
2. Allen CE. 1935b. Polyploidy in Sphaerocarpos. American Journal of Botany 22: 554-680.
3. Allen CE. 1945. The genetics of bryophytes. II. Botanical Review 11: 260-287.
4. Bainard JD, Newmaster SG. 2010. Endopolyploidy in bryophytes: widespread in mosses and absent in liverworts. Journal of Botany in press. doi:10.1155/2010/316356.
5. Carolina Biological Supply Company. 1987. Culturing algae. Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply Company.
6. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
7. Crawford M, Jesson LK, Garnock-Jones PJ. 2009. Correlated evolution of sexual system and life history traits in mosses. Evolution 63: 1129-1142.
8. Crum HA, Anderson LE. 1981. Mosses of eastern North America. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Dolezel J, Binarová P, Lucretti S. 1989. Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biologia plantarum (Praha) 31: 113-120.
10. Dolezel J, Sgorbati S, Lucretti S. 1992. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow-cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiologia Plantarum 85: 625-631.
11. Eppley SM, Taylor PJ, Jesson LK. 2007. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity 98: 38-44.
12. Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF. 1999. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79.
14. Grant V. 1956. The influence of breeding habit on the outcome of natural hybridization in plants. American Naturalist 90: 319-322.
15. Grout AJ. 1928. Moss flora of North America, north of Mexico. New York: published by author (reprinted by Hafner Publishing Company, New York, 1972).
16. Haig D, Westoby M. 1988. A model for the origin of heterospory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 134: 257-272.
17. Hedrick PW. 1987. Genetic load and the mating system in homosporous ferns. Evolution 41: 1282-1289.
18. Herbert PDN, Beaton MJ. 1993. Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis: a practical handbook. Beaumont, TX: Helena Laboratories.
19. Holsinger KE. 1987. Gametophytic self-fertilization in homosporous plants: development, evaluation, and application of a statistical method for evaluating its importance. American Journal of Botany 74: 1173-1183.
20. Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass action models for plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138: 606-622.
21. Holsinger KE. 1992. Ecological models of plant reproduction and the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. In: Wyatt R. ed. Plant reproductive ecology: new approaches. New York: Chapman & Hall. Holsinger KE, Lewis PO. 2001-2009.
22. Hickory: A package for analysis of population genetic data, 1.1 ed. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. Holsinger KE, Wallace LE. 2004. Bayesian approaches for the analysis of population genetic structure: an example from Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae). Molecular Ecology 13: 887-894.
23. Ireland RR. 1969. Taxonomic studies on the genus Atrichum in North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 47: 353-368.
24. Ireland RR. 1982. Moss flora of the Maritime provinces. Ottawa: National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada.
25. Johnston MO, Porcher E, Cheptou P-O, et al. 2009. Correlations among fertility components can maintain mixed mating in plants. American Naturalist 173: 1-11.
26. Klekowski EJ. 1969. Reproductive biology of the Pteridophyta: II. Theoretical considerations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 347-359.
27. Klekowski EJ. 1979. The genetics and reproductive biology of ferns. In: Dyer AF, ed. The Experimental Biology of Ferns. New York: Academic Press, 133-170.
28. Klekowski EJ, Baker HG. 1966. Evolutionary significance of polyploidy in the Pteridophyta. Science 153: 305-307.
29. Kron P, Husband BC. 2009. Hybridization and the reproductive pathways mediating gene flow between native Malus coronaria and domestic apple, M. domestica. Botany 87: 864-874.
30. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
31. Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
32. Lewis KR. 1961. The genetics of bryophytes. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 4: 111-130.
33. Lloyd DG. 1982. Selection of combined versus separate sexes in seed plants. American Naturalist 120: 571-585.
34. McDaniel SF, Willis JH, Shaw AJ. 2007. A linkage map reveals a complex basis for segregation distortion in an interpopulation cross in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. Genetics 176: 2489-2500.
35. Okada S, Sone T, Fujisawa M, et al. 2001. The Y chromosome in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha has accumulated unique repeat sequences harboring a male-specific gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98: 9454-9459.
36. Porcher E, Lande R. 2005. Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytologist 166: 673-684.
37. Quinn G, Keough M. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501.
39. Ricca M, Shaw AJ. 2010. Allopolyploidy and homoploid hybridization in the Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae: Bryophyta). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 135-151.
40. Ronfort J. 1999. The mutation load under tetrasomic inheritance and its consequences for the evolution of the selfing rate in autotetraploid species. Genetical Research 74: 31-42.
41. Smith Merrill G, Ireland RR. 2005. Atrichum. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee. ed. Bryophyte flora of North America north of Mexico. Missouri: Oxford University Press.
42. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1992. The distribution of selfing rates in homosporous ferns. American Journal of Botany 79: 97-100.
43. Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9-27.
44. Stark LR. 1983. Bisexuality as an adaptation in desert mosses. American Midland Naturalist 110: 445-448.
45. Stebbins GL. 1957. Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. American Naturalist 91: 337-354.
46. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold.
47. Szövényi P, Ricca M, Shaw AJ. 2009. Multiple paternity and sporophytic inbreeding depression in a dioicous moss species. Heredity 103: 394-403.
48. Tatuno S, Kise Y. 1970. Cytological studies on Atrichum, with special reference to structural sex chromosomes and sexuality. Botanical Magazine Tokyo 83: 163-172.
49. Taylor PJ, Eppley SM, Jesson LK. 2007. Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes. American Journal of Botany 94: 1853-1859.
50. Vamosi JC, Otto SP, Barrett SCH. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 1006-1018.
51. Weiblen GD, Oyama RK, Donoghue MJ. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. American Naturalist 155: 46-58.
52. Wyatt R. 1982. Population ecology of bryophytes. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 52: 179-198.