Influence of abutment screw preload on stress distribution in marginal bone

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 303-307

  Khraisat, Ameen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Bone stress; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Implant abutment joint; Marginal bone; Preload

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 84873024256     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: A 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:413-420.
2. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI dental implants and Brånemark system implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:130-141.
3. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Alcoforado G, Etienne D, Celletti R. The self-tapping and ICE 3i implants: A prospective 3-year multicenter evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:52-60.
4. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-470.
5. Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van der Reijden WA. Feasibility and influence of the microgap of two implants placed in a non-submerged procedure: A five-year follow-up clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006;77:1051-1060.
6. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010;81:1350-1366.
7. Cimen H, Yengin E. Analyzing the effects of the platform switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by FEM analysis. J Oral Implantol 2010 Jul 21 [epub ahead of print].
8. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-33.
9. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:604-610.
10. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörnéus L. Forces and moments on Brånemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4:241-247.
11. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:71-89.
12. Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:539-546.
13. Wang RF, Kang B, Lang LA, Razzoog ME. The dynamic natures of implant loading. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:359-371.
14. Guda T, Ross TA, Lang LA, Millwater HR. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:183-193.
15. Abu-Hammad OA, Harrison A, Williams D. The effect of a hydroxyapatite- reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:559-564.
16. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-360.
17. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:394-405.
18. Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Die knochenresorption an der eintrittstelle osseointegrierter implantate-Ein biomechanisches phänomen. Eine finite-element-studie [in German]. Z Stomatol 1989;86:207-216.
19. Norton M. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91-99.
20. Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111-119.
21. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(suppl 4):207-215.
22. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:286-293.
23. Chang CL, Chen CS, Hsu ML. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:295-304.
24. Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Adelino Ricardo Barão V, de Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Implant platform switching: Biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:182-187.
25. Akça K, Cehreli MC, Iplikçioğplu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduceddiameter Morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:444-454.
26. Alkan I, Sertgöz A, Ekici B. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:319-325.