Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 295-304

  Chang, Chih Ling ^a,b   Chen, Chen Sheng ^a   Hsu, Ming Lun ^a  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b SHIN KONG WU HO SU MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Orthotropy; Platform switching; Stress; Transverse isotropy

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GOLD ALLOY; TITANIUM;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANISOTROPY; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; MOLAR; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 77953256774     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71:546-549.
2. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss:Literature support. Implant Dent 2005;14:108-116.
3. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
4. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
5. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-485.
6. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design-Effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-483.
7. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants:An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-218.
8. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in periimplant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:255-261.
9. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:73-79.
10. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
11. Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:323-326.
12. Siar CH, Toh CG, Romanos G, et al. Peri-implant soft tissue integration of immediately loaded implants in the posterior macaque mandible: A histomorphometric study. J Periodontol 2003;74:571-578.
13. Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:387-392.
14. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15:313-320.
15. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: A proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:995-1000.
16. Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu ML. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: A 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:623-630.
17. Wang TM, Leu LJ, Wang J, Lin LD. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: A numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:231-237.
18. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:188-198.
19. Moffa JP, Lugassy AA, Guckes AD, Gettleman L. An evaluation of nonprecious alloys for use with porcelain veneers. Part 1. Physical properties. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:424-431.
20. van Rossen IP, Braak LH, de Putter C, de Groot K. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:198-205.
21. Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC. Edentulation alters material properties of cortical bone in the human mandible. J Dent Res 2002;81:613-617.
22. O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:648-657.
23. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: Influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-494.
24. Liao SH, Tong RF, Dong JX. Influence of anisotropy on periimplant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2008;32:53-60.
25. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone:A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:144-150.
26. Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finiteelement analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:38-44.
27. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
28. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-360.
29. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-334.
30. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:440-446.
31. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34-37.
32. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:735-740.
33. Shi L, Li H, Fok AS, Ucer C, Devlin H, Horner K. Shape optimization of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:911-920.
34. Roberts WE, Garetto LP. Bone physiology and metabolism. In:Misch CE (ed). Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:225-237.
35. Eggers GW, Shindler TO, Pomerat CM. The influence of the contact- compression factor on osteogenesis in surgical fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949;31A:693-716.
36. Treharne RW. Review of Wolff’s law and its proposed means of operation. Orthop Rev 1981;10:35-47.
37. Eggers Lura H. Tissue reaction of bone upon mechanical stresses. Am J Orthod 1952;38:453-459.
38. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(suppl 2):8-18.
39. Quek HC, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: Effect of torque level and implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:253-262.
40. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, et al. A multicenter 12- month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-192.
41. Norton MR. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:274-281.
42. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:179-182.
43. Chou CT, Morris HF, Ochi S, Walker L, DesRosiers D. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: Loading to 36 months. J Oral Implantol 2004;30:134-143.
44. De Kok IJ, Chang SS, Moriarty JD, Cooper LF. A retrospective analysis of peri-implant tissue responses at immediate load/provisionalized microthreaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:405-412.
45. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Immediate loading using cross-arch fixed restorations in heavy smokers: Nine consecutive case reports for edentulous arches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:513-519.
46. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-1130.
47. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:559-571.
48. Todescan FF, Pustiglioni FE, Imbronito AV, Albrektsson T, Gioso M. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:467-472.
49. Huang HL, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Fallgatter AM, Ko CC. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:551-562.
50. O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Katz JO, Spencer P. Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:415-421.
51. Schwartz-Dabney CL, Dechow PC. Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 2003;120:252-277.
52. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: Considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:401-412.
53. Hsu ML, Chen FC, Kao HC, Cheng CK. Influence of off-axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:301-309.
54. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-A two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:80-88.
55. Hagberg C. Assessment of bite force: A review. J Craniomandib Disord 1987;1:162-169.
56. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: A methodologic clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:20-27.
57. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:481-486.
58. Proeschel PA, Morneburg T. Task-dependence of activity/ biteforce relations and its impact on estimation of chewing force from EMG. J Dent Res 2002;81:464-468.
59. Al-Sukhun J, Kelleway J. Biomechanics of the mandible: Part II. Development of a 3-dimensional finite element model to study mandibular functional deformation in subjects treated with dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:455-466.