Molecular marker genotypes, heterozygosity and genetic interactions explain heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana

Heredity

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 295-304

  Syed, N H ^a,c   Chen, Z J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis; Heterosis; Heterozygosity; Hybrid vigor; NCIII design; RILs

Indexed keywords

HETEROSIS;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOTE;

ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRID VIGOR; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 15544371510     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800558     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barth S, Busimi AK, Friedrich Utz H, Melchinger AE (2003). Heterosis for biomass yield and related traits in five hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Heredity 91: 36-42.
2. Basten CJ, Weir BS, Zeng ZB (2001). QTL cartographer version 1.15. In: Statistics, North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC.
3. Bell CJ, Ecker JR (1994). Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19: 137-144.
4. Birchler JA, Augar DL, Riddle NC (2003). In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell 15: 2236-2239.
5. Bonierbale MW, Plaisted RL, Tanksley SD (1993). A test of the maximum heterozygosity hypothesis using molecular markers in tetraploid potatoes. Theor Appl Genet 86: 481-491.
6. Boppenmaier J, Melchinger AE, Seitz G, Geiger HH, Herrmann RG (1993). Genetic diversity for RFLPs in Euporean maize inbreds III. Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breed 111: 217-226.
7. Bruce AB (1910). The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32: 627-628.
8. Cheverud JM, Routman EJ (1995). Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139: 1455-1461.
9. Cheverud JM, Routman EJ (1996). Epistasis as source of increased additive genetic variance at population bottlenecks. Evolution 50: 1042-1051.
10. Cockerham CC, Zeng ZB (1996). Design III with marker loci. Genetics 143: 1437-1456.
11. Comstock RE, Robinson HF (1952) In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis, Iowa State College Press: Ames, IA. pp 494-516.
12. Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) (1999). Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops, American Society of Agronomy Inc.: Madison, WI.
13. Crow JF (1948). Alternative hypothesis of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33: 477-487.
14. Dobzhansky T (1950). Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations Drosophila pseudobscura. Genetics 35: 288-302.
15. Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995). Teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
16. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997). The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488.
17. Dudley JW, Saghai Maroof MA, Rufener GK (1991). Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programmes. Crop Sci 31: 718-723.
18. East EM (1936). Heterosis. Genetics 21: 375-397.
19. Eshed Y, Zamir D (1996). Less-than-additive epistatic interactions of quantitative trait loci in tomato. Genetics 143: 1807-1817.
20. Fenster CB, Galloway LF (2000). Population differentiation in an annual legume genetic architecture. Evolution 54: 1157-1172.
21. Godshalk EB, Lee M, Lamkey KR (1990). Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphism to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor Appl Genet 80: 273-280.
22. Jinks JL (1955). A survey of the genetical basis of heterosis in a variety of diallel crosses. Heredity 9: 223-238.
23. Jones DF (1917). Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2: 466-479.
24. Kearsey MJ, Hyne V (1994). QTL analysis: a simple 'marker regression approach'. Theor Appl Genet 89: 698-702.
25. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS (1996). The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Chapman and Hall: London.
26. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS, Syed NH (2003). The genetics of quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 91: 456-464.
27. King G, Nienhuis J, Hussey C (1993). Genetic similarity among ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana estimated by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet 86: 1028-1032.
28. Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR, Woodman WW (1989). Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 30: 1033-1040.
29. Li ZK, Luo LJ, Mei HW, Wang DL, Shu QY, Tabien R et al (2001). Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. Genetics 158: 1737-1753.
30. Lister C, Dean C (1993). Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 4: 745-750.
31. Luo LJ, Li ZK, Mei HW, Shu QY, Tabien R, Zhong DB et al (2001). Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. Genetics 158: 1755-1771.
32. Martin JM, Blake TK, Hockett EA (1991). Diversity among North American spring barley cultivars based on coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci 31: 1131-1137.
33. Matzke JM, Neuhuber F, Matzke AJM (1993). A variety of epistatic interactions can occur between partially homologous transgene loci brought together by sexual crossing. Mol Gen Genet 236: 379-386.
34. Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Woodman WL (1990). Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci 30: 1033-1040.
35. Mitchell-Olds T (1995). Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidopsis. Genetics 140: 1105-1109.
36. Pooni HS, Virk PS, Coombs DT, Chowdhury MKU (1994). The genetic basis of hybrid vigor in highly heterotic cross of Nicotiana tabacum. Theor Appl Genet 89: 1027-1031.
37. Rasmusson DC, Phillips RL (1997). Plant breeding progress and genetic diversity from de novo variation and elevated epistasis. Crop Sci 37: 303-310.
38. Routman EJ, Cheverud JM (1997). Gene effects on a quantitative trait: two locus epistatic effects measured at microsatellite markers and estimated QTL. Evolution 51: 1654-1662.
39. Russell WA, Sprague GF, Penny LH (1963). Mutations affecting quantitative characters in long time inbred lines of maize. Crop Sci 3: 175:178.
40. Shull GH (1908). The composition of a field of maize. Am Breeders Assoc Rep 4: 296-301.
41. Smith OS, Smith JSC, Brown SL, Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990). Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80: 833-840.
42. Sprague GF, Russell WA, Penny LH (1960). Mutations affecting quantitative traits in selfed progeny of doubled monoploid maize stocks. Genetics 45: 855-865.
43. Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES. (1992). Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
44. Torii KU, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Matsuura Y, Yokoyama R, Whittier RF et al (1996). The Arabidopsis ERECTA gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. Plant Cell 8: 735-746.
45. Virk PS, Pooni HS, Syed NH, Kearsey MJ (1999). Fast and reliable genotype validation using microsatellite markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor Appl Genet 98: 462-464.
46. Xiao J, Li J, Yuan L, Tanksley SD (1995). Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
47. Zeng ZB (1993). Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 10972-10976.