Genetic dissection of maize phenology using an intraspecific introgression library

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Salvi, Silvio ^a   Corneti, Simona ^a   Bellotti, Massimo ^a   Carraro, Nicola ^a,b   Sanguineti, Maria C ^a   Castelletti, Sara ^a   Tuberosa, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; FLOWER; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; INHERITANCE; MAIZE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT CHROMOSOME; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TIME;

CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLOWERS; GENE LIBRARY; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78650893977     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-4     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Thoday J. Location of polygenes. Nature 1961, 191:368-370.
2. Wehrhahn C, Allard R. The detection and measurements of the effects of individual genes involved in the inheritance of a quantitative character in wheat. Genetics 1965, 51:109-119. 1210759, 17248230.
3. Eshed Y, Zamir D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 1995, 141(3):1147-1162. 1206837, 8582620.
4. Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2001, 2(12):983-989. 10.1038/35103589, 11733751.
5. Grandillo S, Tanksley S, Zamir D. Exploitation of natural biodiversity through genomics. Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement: Genomics Approaches and Platforms 2007, 121-150. New York: Springer, Varshney RK, Tuberosa R.
6. Keurentjes JJB, Bentsink L, Alonso-Blanco C, Hanhart CJ, Vries HBD, Effgen S, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M. Development of a near-isogenic line population of Arabidopsis thaliana and comparison of mapping power with a recombinant inbred line population. Genetics 2007, 175(2):891-905. 10.1534/genetics.106.066423, 1800614, 17179089.
7. Schmalenbach I, Korber N, Pillen K. Selecting a set of wild barley introgression lines and verification of QTL effects for resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust. Theor Appl Genet 2008, 117(7):1093-1106. 10.1007/s00122-008-0847-7, 18663425.
8. Takada T, Mita A, Maeno A, Sakai T, Shitara H, Kikkawa Y, Moriwaki K, Yonekawa H, Shiroishi T. Mouse inter-subspecific consomic strains for genetic dissection of quantitative complex traits. Genome Res 2008, 18(3):500-508. 10.1101/gr.7175308, 2259114, 18256237.
9. Doroszuk A, Snoek LB, Fradin E, Riksen J, Kammenga J. A genome-wide library of CB4856/N2 introgression lines of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(16). 10.1093/nar/gkp528, 2760803, 19542186.
10. Torjek O, Meyer RC, Zehnsdorf M, Teltow M, Strompen G, Witucka-Wall H, Blacha A, Altmann T. Construction and analysis of 2 reciprocal Arabidopsis introgression line populations. J Hered 2008, 99(4):396-406. 10.1093/jhered/esn014, 18310067.
11. Szalma SJ, Hostert BM, LeDeaux JR, Stuber CW, Holland JB. QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize. Theor Appl Genet 2007, 114(7):1211-1228. 10.1007/s00122-007-0512-6, 17308934.
12. Saha S, Jenkins JN, Wu JX, McCarty JC, Gutierrez OA, Percy RG, Cantrell RG, Stelly DM. Effects of chromosome-specific introgression in upland cotton on fiber and agronomic traits. Genetics 2006, 172(3):1927-1938. 10.1534/genetics.105.053371, 1456304, 16387867.
13. Stuber CW, Polacco M, Lynn M. Synergy of empirical breeding, marker-assisted selection, and genomics to increase crop yield potential. Crop Sci 1999, 39(6):1571-1583.
14. Ashikari M, Matsuoka M. Identification, isolation and pyramiding of quantitative trait loci for rice breeding. Trends Plant Sci 2006, 11(7):344-350. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.008, 16769240.
15. Lippman ZB, Semel Y, Zamir D. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr Opin Genet & Dev 2007, 17(6):545-552. 10.1016/j.gde.2007.07.007, 17723293.
16. Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, van der Knaap E, Cong B, Liu JP, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD. fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 2000, 289(5476):85-88. 10.1126/science.289.5476.85, 10884229.
17. Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97(9):4718-4723. 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4718, 18299, 10781077.
18. Vigouroux Y, Glaubitz JC, Matsuoka Y, Goodman MM, Jesus SG, Doebley J. Population structure and genetic diversity of new world maize races assessed by DNA microsatellites. Am J Bot 2008, 95(10):1240-1253.
19. Goodman MM, Brown WL. Races of corn. Corn and corn improvement 1988, 33-79. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Sprague GF, Dudley JW, 3.
20. Vladutu C, McLaughlin J, Phillips RL. Fine mapping and characterization of linked quantitative trait loci involved in the transition of the maize apical meristem from vegetative to generative structures. Genetics 1999, 153(2):993-1007. 1460787, 10511573.
21. Salvi S, Tuberosa R, Chiapparino E, Maccaferri M, Veillet S, van Beuningen L, Isaac P, Edwards K, Phillips RL. Toward positional cloning of Vgt1, a QTL controlling the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase in maize. Plant Mol Biol 2002, 48(5):601-613. 10.1023/A:1014838024509, 11999837.
22. Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Tomes D, Niu X, Fengler K, Meeley R, Ananiev E, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, Niu X, Li B, Rafalski A, Tingey SV, Miao G-H, Phillips RL, Tomes D, Tuberosa R. Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104(27):11376-11381. 10.1073/pnas.0704145104, 2040906, 17595297.
23. Lauter N, Moscou M, Habiger J, Moose S. Quantitative genetic dissection of shoot architecture traits in maize: towards a functional genomics approach. Plant Genome 2008, 1:99-110.
24. Coles ND, McMullen MD, Balint-Kurti PJ, Pratt RC, Holland JB. Genetic control of photoperiod sensitivity in maize revealed by joint multiple population analysis. Genetics 2010, 184(3):799-812. 10.1534/genetics.109.110304, 2845347, 20008571.
25. Ducrocq S, Giauffret C, Madur D, Combes V, Dumas F, Jouanne S, Coubriche D, Jamin P, Moreau L, Charcosset A. Fine mapping and haplotype structure analysis of a major flowering time quantitative trait locus on maize chromosome 10. Genetics 2009, 183(4):1555-1563. 10.1534/genetics.109.106922, 2787439, 19822732.
26. Wang CL, Cheng FF, Sun ZH, Tang JH, Wu LC, Ku LX, Chen YH. Genetic analysis of photoperiod sensitivity in a tropical by temperate maize recombinant inbred population using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 2008, 117(7):1129-1139. 10.1007/s00122-008-0851-y, 18677461.
27. Neuffer MG, Coe EH, Wessler SR. Mutants of maize 1997, New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
28. Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon DE, Larsson S, Lepak NK, Li HH, Mitchell SE, Pressoir G, Peiffer JA, Rosas MO, Rocheford TR, Romay MC, Romero S, Salvo S, Villeda HS, Da Silva HS, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu JM, Zhang ZW, Kresovich S, McMullen MD. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 2009, 325(5941):714-718. 10.1126/science.1174276, 19661422.
29. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326(5956):1112-1115. 10.1126/science.1178534, 19965430.
30. Salvi S, Tuberosa R. To clone or not to clone plant QTLs: present and future challenges. Trends Plant Sci 2005, 10(6):297-304. 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.008, 15949764.
31. Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Sanguineti MC, Landi P, Maccaferri M, Conti S. Mapping QTLs regulating morpho-physiological traits and yield in drought-stressed maize: case studies, shortcomings and perspectives. Ann Bot 2002, 89(7):941-963. 10.1093/aob/mcf134, 12102519.
32. Chuck G, Cigan AM, Saeteurn K, Hake S. The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat Genet 2007, 39(4):544-549. 10.1038/ng2001, 17369828.
33. Kawakatsu T, Taramino G, Itoh J, Allen J, Sato Y, Hong SK, Yule R, Nagasawa N, Kojima M, Kusaba M, Sakakibara H, Sakai H, Nagato Y. PLASTOCHRON3/GOLIATH encodes a glutamate carboxypeptidase required for proper development in rice. Plant J 2009, 58(6):1028-1040. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03841.x, 19228340.
34. Shimizu-Sato S, Tanaka M, Mori H. Auxin-cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Mol Biol 2009, 69(4):429-435. 10.1007/s11103-008-9416-3, 18974937.
35. Ragot M, Sisco PH, Hoisington DA, Stuber CW. Molecular-marker-mediated characterization of favorable exotic alleles at quantitative trait loci in maize. Crop Sci 1995, 35(5):1306-1315.
36. Gallavotti A, Zhao Q, Kyozuka J, Meeley RB, Ritter M, Doebley JF, Pe ME, Schmidt RJ. The role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize. Nature 2004, 432(7017):630-635. 10.1038/nature03148, 15577912.
37. Shaver D. Genetics and breeding of maize with extra leaves above the ear. 38th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference: 7-8 Dec. 1983 1983, 161-180. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association.
38. Winkler RG, Helentjaris T. The maize Dwarf3 gene encodes a cytochrome p450-mediated early step in gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 1995, 7(8):1307-1317. 10.1105/tpc.7.8.1307, 160953, 7549486.
39. Melchinger AE, Piepho HP, Utz HF, Muminovic J, Wegenast T, Torjek O, Altmann T, Kusterer B. Genetic basis of heterosis for growth-related traits in Arabidopsis investigated by testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines reveals a significant role of epistasis. Genetics 2007, 177(3):1827-1837. 10.1534/genetics.107.080564, 2147963, 18039884.
40. Reif JC, Kusterer B, Piepho HP, Meyer RC, Altmann T, Schon CC, Melchinger AE. Unraveling epistasis with triple testcross progenies of near-isogenic lines. Genetics 2009, 181(1):247-257. 10.1534/genetics.108.093047, 2621173, 18984574.
41. Laurie DA, Bennett MD. Nuclear-DNA content in the genera Zea and Sorghum - intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific variation. Heredity 1985, 55:307-313.
42. Rayburn AL, Price HJ, Smith JD, Gold JR. C-band heterochromatin and DNA content in Zea mays. Am J Bot 1985, 72(10):1610-1617.
43. Rayburn AL, Dudley JW, Biradar DP. Selection for early flowering results in simultaneous selection for reduced nuclear DNA content in maize. Plant Breed 1994, 112(4):318-322.
44. Dawe R. Maize centromeres and knobs (neocentromeres). Maize Handbook Volume II Genetics and Genomics 2009, New York: Springer, Bennetzen J, Hake S.
45. Chughtai SR, Steffensen DM. Heterochromatic knob composition of commercial inbred lines of maize. Maydica 1987, 32(3):171-187.
46. Grant WF, Owens ET. Zea mays assays of chemical/radiation genotoxicity for the study of environmental mutagens. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2006, 613(1):17-64.
47. Ananiev EV, Phillips RL, Rines HW. Complex structure of knob DNA on maize chromosome 9: Retrotransposon invasion into heterochromatin. Genetics 1998, 149(4):2025-2037. 1460258, 9691055.
48. Salvi S, Castelletti S, Tuberosa R. An updated consensus map for flowering time QTLs in maize. Maydica 2009, 54:501-512.
49. Chardon F, Virlon B, Moreau L, Falque M, Joets J, Decousset L, Murigneux A, Charcosset A. Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics 2004, 168(4):2169-2185. 10.1534/genetics.104.032375, 1448716, 15611184.
50. Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Hou ZL, Ananiev EV, Simmons CR. A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol 2008, 146(1):250-264. 10.1104/pp.107.109538, 2230559, 17993543.
51. Lauter N, Kampani A, Carlson S, Goebel M, Moose SP. microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(26):9412-9417. 10.1073/pnas.0503927102, 1166634, 15958531.
52. Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Zhu WY, Upadyayula N, Rocheford T, Buckler ES, Kresovich S. Natural variation in maize architecture is mediated by allelic differences at the PINOID co-ortholog barren inflorescence2. Plant J 2009, 58(4):618-628. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03802.x, 19154226.
53. Ducrocq S, Madur D, Veyrieras JB, Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Kloiber-Maitz M, Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Manicacci D, Charcosset A. Key impact of Vgt1 on flowering time adaptation in maize: Evidence from association mapping and ecogeographical information. Genetics 2008, 178(4):2433-2437. 10.1534/genetics.107.084830, 2323828, 18430961.
54. Tracy WF, Whitt SR, Buckler ES. Recurrent mutation and genome evolution: example of Sugary1 and the origin of sweet maize. Crop Sci 2006, 46(S1):S-49-S-54.
55. Durand E, Tenaillon M, Ridel C, Coubriche D, Jamin P, Jouanne S, Ressayre A, Charcosset A, Dillmann C. Standing variation and new mutations both contribute to a fast response to selection for flowering time in maize inbreds. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:2. 10.1186/1471-2148-10-2, 2837650, 20047647.
56. Morgante M, Brunner S, Pea G, Fengler K, Zuccolo A, Rafalski A. Gene duplication and exon shuffling by helitron-like transposons generate intraspecies diversity in maize. Nat Genet 2005, 37(9):997-1002. 10.1038/ng1615, 16056225.
57. Wang QH, Dooner HK. Remarkable variation in maize genome structure inferred from haplotype diversity at the bz locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103(47):17644-17649. 10.1073/pnas.0603080103, 1693800, 17101975.
58. Vladutu CI, Phillips RL. Spontaneous activation of transposable elements following an interracial cross in maize. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 1998, 72:70-71.
59. Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J. A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(9):6080-6084. 10.1073/pnas.052125199, 122905, 11983901.
60. Fritz GJ. New dates and data on early agriculture - The legacy of complex hunter-gatherers. Ann Miss Bot Gard 1995, 82(1):3-15.
61. Byers D. Review of "The Native Americans: Prehistory and Ethnology of the North American Indians" by Spencer RF and Jennings JD. Am Antiquity 1966, 31:582-584.
62. Gerdes JT, Behr CF, Coors JG, Tracy WF. Compilation of North American Maize Breeding Germplasm 1993, Madison: Crop Science Society of America, Tracy WF, Coors JG, Geadelmann JL.
63. Salvi S, Phillips RL, Tuberosa R. Development of PCR-based assays for allelic discrimination in maize by using the 5'-nuclease procedure. Mol Breed 2001, 8(2):169-176.
64. Van Ooijen J, Voorrips R. Join Map® 3.0, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. 2001, Plant Research International, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
65. Dwyer LM, Stewart DW, Carrigan L, Ma BL, Neave P, Balchin D. Guidelines for comparisons among different maize maturity rating systems. Agron J 1999, 91(6):946-949.
66. Utz HF. PLABSTAT: a computer program for the statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. 1998, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany: Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics.
67. Utz HF, Melchinger AE. PLABQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J Quant Trait Loci 1996, 2(1).
68. Voorrips RE. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 2002, 93(1):77-78. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77, 12011185.
69. McCouch S, Cho Y, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetics Newsletter 1997, 14:11-13.