Decentralized output feedback polynomial control of seismically excited structures using genetic algorithm

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 241-258

  Cha, Young Jin ^a   Agrawal, Anil K ^a  

^a CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

active; bridge; control; genetic algorithm; polynomial equation; semi active

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE; BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; BRIDGE SYSTEMS; CONTROL DEVICE; CONTROL FORCE; CONTROL STRATEGIES; DECENTRALIZED OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; OPTIMAL COEFFICIENT; OUTPUT FEEDBACK; PHASE I; PHASE II; POLYNOMIAL EQUATION; REDUNDANT REPRESENTATION; SEISMICALLY EXCITED STRUCTURES; SEMI-ACTIVE; SEMIACTIVE CONTROL; THIRD-ORDER;

BENCHMARKING; BRIDGES; CONTROL; EARTHQUAKES; POLYNOMIALS;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84872913445     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.486     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Spencer BF Jr, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS,. Benchmark problems in structural control-part I: active mass driver system, and part II: active tendon system. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27 (11): 1127-1139, 1141-1147.
2. Spencer BF Jr, Christenson RE, Dyke SJ,. Next generation benchmark control problem for seismically excited buildings. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, 29 June-2 July, 1999; 1351-1360.
3. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF Jr, Dyke SJ,. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004; 130 (4): 366-385.
4. Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B, Wu JC,. Benchmark problem for response control of wind excited tall buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2004; 130 (4): 437-446.
5. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Gavin H, Johnson EA, Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part I: problem definition Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13 (2-3): 573-588.
6. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S,. Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part II: phase I sample controllers for linear isolation systems. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13 (2-3): 589-604.
7. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA,. Structural control benchmark problem: phase II-nonlinear smart base-isolated building subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15 (5): 653-656.
8. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA,. Smart base-isolated benchmark building part IV: phase II sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15 (5): 657-672.
9. Dyke SJ, Caicedo JM, Turan G, Bergman LA, Hague S,. Phase I benchmark control system for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 2003; 129 (7): 857-872.
10. Caicedo JM, Dyke SJ, Moon SJ, Bergman LA, Turan G, Hague S,. Phase II benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Control (currently Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2003; 10 (3-4): 137-168.
11. Agrawal AK, Tan P, Nagarajaiah S, Zhang J,. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part I: problem definition. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (5): 509-529.
12. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S, Agrawal AK, Tan P,. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part III: phase II Sample controller for the fully base-isolated case. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (5): 549-563.
13. Soong TT,. Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice. Wiley New York, 1990.
14. Yang JN, Li Z, Vongchavalitkul S,. A generalization of optimal control theory: Linear and Nonlinear Structures. Rep. No. NCEER-92-0026, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y. 1992.
15. Dyke SJ, Spencer BF Jr, Sain MK, Carlson JD,. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials and Structures. 1996; 5: 565-575.
16. Chang CC, Zhou L,. Neural network emulation of inverse dynamics for a magnetorheological damper. Journal of structural Engineering, ASCE 2002; 128 (2): 231-239.
17. Yan G, Zhou LL,. Fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms for intelligent control of structures using MR dampers. Smart Materials and Structures 2004; 5391: 555-565.
18. Shook DA, Roschke PN, Lin PY, Loh CH,. GA-optimized fuzzy logic control of a large-scale building for seismic loads. Journal of Engineering Structures 2008; 30: 436-449.
19. Yan, G., and, L.L. Zhou, (2006). Integrated fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm for multi-objective control of structures using MR dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 296 (1-2): 368-382.
20. Rao SS, Pan T, Venkayya VB,. Optimal placement of actuators in actively controlled structures using genetic algorithms. AIAA Journal 1991; 29 (6): 942-943.
21. Furuya H, Haftka RT,. Placing actuators on space structures by genetic algorithms and effectiveness indices. Structural Optimization 1995; 9 (2): 69-75.
22. Li QS, Liu DK, Fang JQ, Tam CM,. Multi-level optimal design of buildings with active control under winds using genetic algorithms. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2000; 86 (1): 65-86.
23. Abdullah MM, Richardson A, Hanif J,. Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30 (8): 1167-1184.
24. Cha YJ,. Structural control architecture optimization for 3-D systems using advanced multi-objective genetic algorithms, Ph.D. dissertation, Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, December 2008.
25. Agranovich G, Ribakov Y,. A method for efficient placement of active dampers in seismically excited structures. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring; Published online in Wiley InterScience, 2009, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21464.
26. Jiang X, Adeli H,. Neuro-genetic algorithm for non-linear active control of structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 75: 770-786.
27. Raich AM, Ghaboussi J,. Evolving structural design solution using an implicit redundant genetic algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1998; 20: 222-231.
28. Tan P, Agrawal AK,. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part II: phase I Sample control designs. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (5): 530-548.
29. Narasimhan S., Robust direct adaptive controller for the nonlinear highway bridge benchmark. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (6): 599-612.
30. Ning XL, Tan P, Huang DY, Zhou FL,. Application of adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control to a seismically excited highway bridge. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (6): 639-656.
31. Pujol G, Acho L, Pozo F, Rodellar J,. A nonlinear damping control for the vibration mitigation of the benchmark highway bridge. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 16 (5): 586-598.
32. Ali FS, Ramaswamy A,. Optimal dynamic inversion-based semi-active control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (5): 564-585.
33. Jung HJ, Jang DD, Choi KM, Cho SW,. Vibration mitigation of highway isolated bridge using MR damper-based smart control system employing an electromagnetic induction part. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (5): 613-625.
34. Paradono MH, Iemura H, Igarashi A, Toyooka A, Kalantari A,. Passively controlled MR damper in the benchmark structural control problem for seismically excited highway bridge. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; 16 (6): 626-638.