Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction

Smart Materials and Structures

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 565-575

  Dyke, S J ^a   Spencer Jr , B F ^b   Sain, M K ^c   Carlson, J D ^d  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Notre Dame   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^d LORD CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; DAMPING; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FEEDBACK; INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RHEOLOGY; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SEISMOLOGY;

CONTROLLABLE FRICTION BRACES; CONTROLLABLE FRICTION ISOLATORS; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS; SEISMIC LOADS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEMI ACTIVE CONTROL DEVICES; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; VARIABLE ORIFICE DAMPERS; VARIABLE STIFFNESS DEVICES;

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0030264561     PISSN: 09641726     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Akbay Z and Aktan H M 1991 Actively regulated friction slip devices Proc. 6th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering pp 367-74
2. Burton S A, Makris N, Konstantopoulos I and Antsaklis P J 1996 Modeling the response of an electrorheological damper: phenomenology and emulation J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 122 897
3. Carlson J D 1994 The promise of controllable fluids Proc. Actuator 94 ed H Borgmann and K Lenz (AXON Technologie Consul GmbH) pp 266-70
4. Carlson J D and Weiss K D 1994 A growing attraction to magnetic fluids Machine Design August 61-4
5. Carlson J D, Catanzarite D M and St Clair K A 1995 Commercial magneto-theological fluid devices Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on ER Fluids, MR Fluids and Associated Technology (Sheffield)
6. Carlson J D and Chrzan M J 1994 Magnetorheological fluid dampers US Patent No 5,277,281
7. Carlson J D, Chrzan M J and James F O 1995 Magnetorheological fluid devices US Patent No 5,398,917
8. Carlson J D and Spencer Jr B F 1996 Magneto-rheological fluid dampers for semi-active seismic control Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Motion and Vibration Control (Chiba, Japan, September 1996) vol III, pp 35-40
9. Constantinou M C and Symans M D 1994 Semi-active fluid viscaus dampers for seismic response control Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control (Pasadena, CA) FA4:3-12
10. Dowdell D J and Cherry S 1994 Semi-active friction dampers for seismic response control of structures Proc. 5th US Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering vol 1, pp 819-28
11. Dyke S J 1996 Acceleration feedback control strategies for active and semi-active systems: modeling, algorithm development and experimental verification PhD Dissertation Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN
12. Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Quast P and Sain M K 1995 The role of control-structure interaction in protective system design J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 121 322-38
13. Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Quast P, Kaspari Jr D C and Sain M K 1996 Implementation of an active mass driver using acceleration feedback control Microcomputers in Civil Engineering (Special Issue on Active and Hybrid Structural Control) 11 305-23
14. Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Quast P, Sain M K, Kaspari Jr D C and Soong T T 1996 Acceleration feedback control of MDOF structures J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 122 907-18
15. Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K and Carlson J D 1996 Seismic response reduction using megnetortheological dampers Proc of the IFAC World Congress (San Francisco, CA, June 30-July 5 1996) vol L, pp 145-50
16. Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sam M K and Carlson J D 1996 Experimental verification of semi-active structural control strategies using acceleration feedback Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Motion and Vibration Control (Chiba, Japan)
17. Ehrgott R C and Masri S F 1992 Modelling of oscillatory dynamic behavior of electrorheological meterials in shear Smart Mater. Struct. 4 275-85
18. Ehrgott R C and Masri S F 1994 Structural control applications of an electrorheological device Proc. Int. Workshop on Structural Control USC Publication No CE-9311 (University of Southern California) pp 115-29
19. Feng Q and Shinozuka M 1990 Use of a variable damper for hybrid control of bridge response under earthquake Proc. US Nat. Workshop on Structural Control Research USC Publications No CE-9013 (University of Southern California) pp 107-12
20. Fujino Y, Soong T T and Spencer Jr B F 1996 Structural control: basic concepts and applications Proc. ASCE Struct. Cong. (Chicago, IL, April 15-18 1996) pp 1277-87
21. Gavin H P, Hose Y D and Hanson R D 1994 Design and control of electrorheological dampers Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control WP3:83-92
22. Housner G W and Masri S F (ed) 1990 Proc. US National Workshop on Structural Control Research USC Publications No M9013 (University of Southern California)
23. Housner G W and Masri S F (ed) 1993 Proc. Int. Workshop on Structural Control USC Publications No CE-9311 (University of Southern California)
24. Housner G W, Masri S F and Chassiakos A G 1994 Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control (Pasadena, CA, 1994)
25. Ivers D E and Miller L R 1989 Experimental comparison of passive, semi-active on/off, and semi-active continuous suspensions SAE Technical Paper Series No 892484
26. Kawashima K, Unjoh S and Shimizu K 1992 Experiments on dynamics characteristics of variable damper Proc. Japan Nat. Symp. on Struct. Resp. Control (Tokyo, Japan) p 121
27. Kobori T, Taksahashi M, Nasu T, Niwa N and Ogasawara K 1993 Seismic response controlled structure with active variable stiffness system Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 22 925-41
28. Kobori T 1994 Future direction on research and development of seismic-response controlled structure Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control Panel: 19-31
29. Kurata N, Kobori T, Takahashi M, Niwa N and Kurino H 1994 Shaking table experiments of active variable damping system Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control (Pasadena, CA) TP2:108-107
30. Makris N, Hill D, Burton S and Jordan M 1995 Electrorheological fluid dampers for seismic protection of structures Proc. SPIE Conf. on Smart Structures and Materials (San Diego, CA) ed I Chopra pp 184-94
31. MATLAB 1994 The Math Works, Inc., Natick, MA
32. McClamroch N H and Gavin H P 1995 Closed loop structural control using electrorheological dampers Proc. American Control Conf. (Seattle, WA) pp 4173-7
33. Miller L R 1988 Tuning passive, semi-active, and fully active suspensions IEEE Proc. Conf. on Decision and Control Paper No 88CH25312/99/000-2047
34. Mizuno T, Kobori T, Harai J, Matsunaga Y and Niwa N 1992 Developmet of adjustable hydraulic dampers for seismic response control of large structure ASME PVP Conf. vol 229, pp 163-70
35. Patten W N, He Q, Kuo C C, Liu L and Sack R L 1994 Suppression of vehicle induced bridge vibration via hydraulic semi-active vibration dampers (SAVD) Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control vol 3, FA1:30-38
36. Sack R L, Kuo C C, Wu H C, Liu L and Patten W N 1994 Seismic motion control via semiactive hydraulic acturators Proc. US 5th Nat. Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (Chicago, IL) vol 2, pp 311-20
37. Shames I H and Cozzarelli F A 1992 Elastic and Inelastic Stress Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall)
38. Shinozuka M, Constantinou M C and Ghanem R 1992 Passive and active fluid dampers in structural applications Proc. US/China/Japan Workshop on Struct. Control (Shanghai, China) pp 507-16
39. Soong T T 1990 Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice (Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical)
40. Spencer Jr B F, Suhardjo J and Sain M K Frequency domain optimal control strategies for aseismic protection J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 120 135-59
41. Spencer Jr B F, Dyke S J and Sain M K 1995 Experimental verification of acceleration feedback control strategies for seismic protection Proc. Japan Soc. of Civil Eng. 3rd Colloquium on Vibration Control of Structures (Tokyo, Japan, August 7-8 1995) Part A, pp 259-65
42. Spencer Jr B F, Dyke S J, Sain M K and Carlson J D 1996 Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper J. Eng. Mech. ASCE at press
43. Spencer Jr B F 1996 Recent trends in vibration control in the USA Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Motion and Vibration Control (Chiba, Japan) pp R1-R6
44. Tseng H E and Hedrick J K 1994 Semi-active control laws - optimal and sub-optimal Vehicle System Dyn. 23 545-69
45. Wen Y K 1976 Method of random vibration of hysteretic systems J Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 102, No EM2, 249-63