Structural control benchmark problem: Phase II - Nonlinear smart base-isolated building subjected to near-fault earthquakes

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 653-656

  Nagarajaiah, Satish ^a   Narasimhan, Sriram ^b   Johnson, Erik ^c  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Active; Benchmark; Bilinear bearings; Friction bearings; Passive; Semiactive; Smart base isolated building

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE CABLES; BUILDINGS; CABLES; SEISMOLOGY; STANDARDS; TECHNOLOGY;

ACTIVE; BENCH-MARK PROBLEMS; BENCHMARK; BENCHMARK CONTROL PROBLEMS; BENCHMARK STUDY; BILINEAR BEARINGS; CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES; CONTROL STRATEGIES; ELASTOMERIC SYSTEMS; FRICTION BEARINGS; GROUND MOTIONS; HOUSTON; ISOLATION SYSTEMS; NEAR-FAULT EARTHQUAKES; PASSIVE; PERFORMANCE INDEXES; PHASE I; PHASE II; PULSE-LIKE; REAL-WORLD; RESPONSE CONTROL; RICE UNIVERSITY; SEMIACTIVE; SMART BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING; SOLUTION TECHNIQUES; STRUCTURAL CONTROLS; THIRD-GENERATION;

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

EID: 49749095156     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.280     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Gavin H, Johnson EA. Smart base isolated benchmark building part I: problem definition. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):573-588.
2. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S. Smart base isolated benchmark building part II: phase I sample controllers for linear isolation system. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):589-604.
3. Erkus B, Johnson E. Smart base isolated benchmark building part III: a sample controller for bilinear isolation. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):605-625.
4. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA. Smart base isolated benchmark building part IV: phase II. Sample controller for nonlinear isolation systems. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:657-672.
5. Chang CM, Park KS, Mullenix A, Spencer B. Semiactive control strategy for a phase II smart base isolated benchmark building. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:673-696.
6. Taflanidis AA, Scruggs JT, Beck JL. Probabilistically-robust nonlinear design of control systems for base isolated structures. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:697-719.
7. Pozo F, Montserrat PM, Rodellar J, Acho L. Robust active control of hysteretic base-isolated structures: application to the benchmark smart base-isolated building. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:720-736.
8. Pradono MH, lemura H, Igarashi A, Kalantari A. Application of angular-mass dampers to base-isolated benchmark building. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:737-745.
9. Shook DA, Roschke PN. Ozbulut OE. Superelastic semi-active damping of a base-isolated structure. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:746-768.
10. Xu Z, Agrawal AK. Semi-active control of seismically-excited base-isolated building model with friction pendulum systems. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:769-784.
11. Choi KM, Jung HJ, Lee HJ, Cho SW. Seismic protection of base isolated building with nonlinear isolation system using smart passive control strategy. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:785-796.
12. Ali SF, Ramaswamy A. GA optimized FLC driven semi-active control for phase II smart nonlinear base isolated benchmark building. Journal of Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2008; 15:797-820.