Optimal dynamic inversion-based semi-active control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers

Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 564-585

  Ali, Sk Faruque ^a   Ramaswamy, Ananth ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Benchmark bridge; Dynamic inversion; Magnetorheological dampers; Optimal control; Semiactive vibration control

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK BRIDGE; DYNAMIC INVERSION; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS; OPTIMAL CONTROL; SEMIACTIVE VIBRATION CONTROL;

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; MAGNETOS; OPTIMIZATION; STATE FEEDBACK; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; VIBRATION CONTROL;

CONTROLLERS;

EID: 68549139789     PISSN: 15452255     EISSN: 15452263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stc.325     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kawashima K, Unjoh S. Seismic response control of bridges by variable dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering 1994; 120(9):2583-2601.
2. Yang JN, Wu JC, Kawashima K, Unjoh S. Hybrid control of seismic-excited bridge structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1995; 24:1437-1451.
3. Saiidi M, Maragakis E, Griffin G. Effect of base isolation on seismic response of multi-column bridges. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 1999; 8:411-419.
4. Nagarajaiah S, Riley MA, Reinhorn A. Control of sliding isolated bridges with absolute acceleration feedback. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1993; 119(11):2317-2332.
5. Sahasrabudhe S, Nagarajaiah S. Semi-active control of sliding isolated bridges using MR dampers: an experimental and numerical study. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2005; 34(8):965-983.
6. Feng Q, Shinozuka M. Use of a variable damper for hybrid control of bridge response under earthquake. Proceedings of U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1990; 107-112.
7. Spencer BFJ, Dyke SJ, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1997; 123(3):230-238.
8. Karnopp D, Crosby M, Harwood R. Vibration control using semi-active force generators. Journal of Engineering for Industry, Transactions of the ASME 1974; 96(2):619-626.
9. Leitmann G. Semi-active control for vibration attenuation. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1994; 5:841-846.
10. Inaudi JA. Modulated homogeneous friction: a semi-active damping strategy. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1997; 26:361-376.
11. He WL, Agrawal AK, Yang J. A novel semi-active friction controller for linear structures against earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(7):941-950.
12. Dyke SJ, Spencer BFJ, Sain MK, Carlson JD. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials & Structures 1996; 5:565-575.
13. Soong TT. Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice. Longman Scientific & Technical, Wiley: New York, 1990.
14. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S. Smart base isolated benchmark building part II: phase I sample controllers for linear isolation system. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):589-604.
15. Ali SF, Ramaswamy A. GA optimized FLC driven semi-active control for phase II smart nonlinear base isolated benchmark building. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2008; 15:797-820.
16. Ali SF. Semi-active control of earthquake induced vibrations in structures using MR dampers: algorithm development, experimental verification and benchmark applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, 2008.
17. Ali SF, Ramaswamy A. Testing and modeling of MR damper and its application to SDOF systems using integral backstepping technique. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control Transactions of ASME, 2009; 13:JDS015902.
18. Xu ZD, Shen YP, Guo YQ. Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural-networks. Smart Materials & Structures 2003; 12:80-87.
19. Ali SF, Padhi R. Active vibration suppression of one-dimensional nonlinear structures using optimal dynamic inversion. Proceedings of IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control, WeA06.6, Singapore, 2007; 573-577.
20. Padhi R, Balakrishnan SN. Optimal dynamic inversion control design for a class of nonlinear distributed parameter systems with continuous and discrete actuators. IET Control Theory and Application 2007; 1(6):1662-1671.
21. Caughey TK. The benchmark problem. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11):1125.
22. Spencer BFJ, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: part I-active mass driver system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11):1127-1139.
23. Spencer BFJ, Dyke SJ, Deoskar HS. Benchmark problems in structural control: part II-active tendon system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1998; 27(11):1140-1147.
24. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF, Dyke SJ. Benchmark problems in seismically excited nonlinear buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(4):366-385.
25. Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B, Wu JC. A benchmark problem for response control of wind excited tall buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(4):437-446. (Pubitemid 38502918)
26. Dyke SJ, Caicedo JM, Turan G, Bergman LA, Hague S. Phase I: benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2003; 129(7):857-872. (Pubitemid 40025797)
27. Caicedo JM, Dyke SJ, Moon SJ, Bergman LA, Turan G, Hague S. Phase II benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2003; 10(3-4):137-168. (Pubitemid 40449783)
28. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S. Smart base isolated buildings with variable friction systems: HN controller and novel SAIVF device. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2006; 35(8):920-942.
29. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA, Gavin HP. Smart base isolated benchmark building part I: problem definition. Journal of Structural Control & Health monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):573-588.
30. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA. Structural control benchmark problem: phase II-nonlinear smart base-isolated building subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2008; 15(5):653-656.
31. Narasimhan S, Nagarajaiah S, Johnson EA. Smart base isolated benchmark building part IV: phase II problem definition and sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring 2008; 15(5):657-672.
32. Erkus B, Johnson EA. Smart base isolated benchmark building part III: a sample controller for bilinear isolation. Journal of Structural Control & Health monitoring 2006; 13(2-3):605-625.
33. Agrawal AK, Tan P, Nagarajaiah S, Zhang J. Benchmark structural control model for a highway bridge. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/stc.301.
34. Tan P, Agrawal AK. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge part-II: sample control designs. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/stc.300.
35. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S, Agrawal A, Tan P. Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge part III: sample controller for the fully base-isolated case. Journal of Structural Control & Health Monitoring, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/stc.293.
36. MATLAB. The Software for Numerical Computing, Version 7.0.1 (R14). The MathWorks, 2004. Available from: http://www.mathworks.com/index.html?ref=pt.