Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hsiao, Ju Ling ^a   Wu, Wen Chu ^b   Chen, Rai Fu ^a  

^a CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

^b CHI MEI MEDICAL CENTER   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anesthesiologist; Decision support systems; Nurse Anesthetist; Pain management; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NURSE ANESTHETIST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSE ANESTHETISTS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872897227     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-16     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Hsaio JL, Chen RF: An investigation on task-technology fit of mobile nursing information systems for nursing performance. CIN-Comput Inform Nu. 2012, 30(5):265-273.
2. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM: Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural model. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76(1):66-77.
3. Department of Health (DoH) of Taiwan: Nurses Act in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: DoH; 2007.
4. Anderson JA, Willson P: Clinical decision support systems in nursing. CIN-Comput Inform Nu. 2008, 26(3):151-158.
5. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 2005, 293(10):1223-1238. (Pubitemid 40327908)
6. Bates DW, Gawande AA: Improving safety with information technology. New Eng J Med 2003, 348(25):2526-2534. (Pubitemid 36706541)
7. de Graaf PMA, van den Eijkel GC, Vullings HJLM, de Mol BAJM: A decision-driven design of a decision support system in anesthesia. Artif Intell Med 1997, 11:141-153. (Pubitemid 27397958)
8. Miller RA: Computer-assisted diagnostic decision support: history, challenges, and possible paths forward. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009, 14(Suppl 1):89-106.
9. White PF: Patient-controlled an analgesia (part I): historical perspective. In Pain management and anesthesiology. Edited by Ashburn MAP, Fine G, Stnaley TH. Boston: Kluwer; 1998:95-101.
10. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Brit Med J 2005, 330:765-772.
11. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, Rousseau N, Grimshaw J, Parkin D, et al: Effect of computerized evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J 2002, 325:941.
12. Eccles M, Hawthorne G, Whitty P, Steen N, Vanoli A, Grimshaw J, et al: A randomised controlled trial of a patient based diabetes recall and management system: the DREAM trial: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2002, 2:5.
13. Im E, Chee W: Nurses' acceptance of the decision support computer program for cancer pain management. CIN-Comput Inform Nu 2006, 24(2):95-104. (Pubitemid 43465931)
14. Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, Thomas E, Mullee M, Turnbull J, et al: Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomized controlled trial. Brit Med J 1998, 317:1054-1059. (Pubitemid 28466723)
15. Salisbury C, Chalder M, Scott TM, Pope C, Moore L: What is the role of walk-in centres in the NHS? Brit Med J 2002, 324:399-402. (Pubitemid 34163905)
16. Berry PH, Dahl JL: The new JCAHO pain standards: implications for pain management nurses. Pain Manag Nurs 2000, 1(1):3-12.
17. Macintyre PE: Safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia. Brit J Anaesth 2001, 87(1):36-46.
18. Ripamonti C: Pain management. Annals of Oncol 2012, 23(s10):x294-x301.
19. Sun V, Borneman T, Piper B, Koczywas M, Ferrell B: Barriers to pain assessment and management in cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv 2008, 2:65-71.
20. Randell R, Mitchell N, Dowding D, Cullum N, Thompson C: Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Health Serv Res Policy 2007, 12(4):242-251.
21. Quinzio L, Junger A, Gottwald B, Benson M, Hartmann B, Jost A: User acceptance of an anaesthesia information management system. Eur J Anaesth 2003, 20(12):967-972. (Pubitemid 37500225)
22. Im E, Chee W: Decision support computer program for cancer pain management. CIN-Comput Inform Nu 2003, 21(1):12-21.
23. Dillon TW, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D: Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems. CIN-Comput Inform Nu 1998, 16(3):151-156. (Pubitemid 128731967)
24. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JA, Warren JG: Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inform Technol 2002, 21(1):47-57. (Pubitemid 34658586)
25. Aldosari B: User acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in a Saudi Arabian hospital radiology department. BMC Med Inform Decis 2012, 12:44. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-44.
26. Chen RF, Hsaio JL: An investigation on physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems: a case study. Int J Med Inform 2012. doi:10.1016/j. ijmedinf.2012.05.003. in press.
27. Randell R, Dowding D: Organisational influences on nurses' use of clinical decision support systems. Int J Med Inform 2010, 79(6):412-421.
28. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB: Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007, 64 (6):650-672. (Pubitemid 350077318)
29. Davis FD: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quart 1989, 13(3):319-340.
30. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun AIS 2003, 12(50):752-780.
31. Chau PYK, Hu PJ: Information technology acceptance by professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sci 2001, 23(4):699-719.
32. Chau PYK, Hu PJ: Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. J Manage Inform Syst 2002, 18(4):191-229.
33. Dixon DR, Stewart M: Exploring information technology adoption by family physicians: survey instrument validation. In Proceedings of the American medical informatics association 2000 on session S69 - current issues in medical informatics edition; November 4-8 2000. Edited by American Medical Informatics Association. Los Angeles, CA:; 2000:185-189.
34. Gagnon MP, Godin G, Gagne C, Fortin JP, Lamothe L, Reinharz D, Cloutier A: An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behavior to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform 2003, 71(2/3):103- 115.
35. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL, Tam KY: Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J Manage Inform Syst 1999, 16(2):91-112. (Pubitemid 32716799)
36. Kidd MR, McPhee W: The lost generation: IT education for healthcare professionals. Med J Australia 1999, 171(10):510-511.
37. Scott RE: e-records in health-preserving our future. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76:427-431.
38. Zhang HY, Cocosila M, Archer N: Factors of adoption of mobile information technology by homecare nurses: a technology acceptance model 2 approach. CIN-Comput Inform Nu 2010, 28(1):49-56.
39. Lu CH, Hsiao JL, Chen RF: Factor determining nursing acceptance of hospital information systems. CIN-Comput Inform Nu 2012, 30(5):257-264.
40. Wu IL, Li JY, Fu CY: The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: an integrative perspective. Decis Support Syst 2011, 51(3):587-596.
41. Fitterer R, Mettler T, Rohner P, Winter R: Taxonomy for multi-perspective assessment of the value of health information systems. Int J of Healthcare Technology and Management 2011, 12(1):45-61.
42. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LS: An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inform 2008, 77(6):386-398. (Pubitemid 351626707)
43. Oroviogoicoechea C, Elliott B, Watson R: Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. J Clin Nurs 2008, 17(5):567-575.
44. DeLone WH, McLean ER: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Inform Syst 2003, 19(4):9-30.
45. Compeau DR, Higgins CA: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. Mis Quart 1995, 19(2):189-211.
46. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F: Use acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003, 27(3):425-478.
47. Flynn LR, Goldsmith RE: A validation of the goldsmith and hofacker innovativeness scale. Educ Psychol Meas 1993, 53(4):1105-1116.
48. Midgley DF, Dowling GR: Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. J Consum Res 1978, 4(4):229-242.
49. Vijayasarathy LR: Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inform Manage 2004, 41(6):747-762.
50. Ong CS, Lai JY: Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Comput Hum Behav 2006, 22(5):816-829.
51. Agarwal R, Karahanna E: Time flies when you're having fun cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Mis Quart 2000, 24(4):665-694.
52. Karahanna E, Ahuja M, Srite M, Galvin J: Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS. Decis Support Syst 2002, 32(4):327-341. (Pubitemid 34154795)
53. Sciulli LM: How organizational structure influences success in various types of innovation. J Retail Bank Serv 1998, 20(1):13-18.
54. Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N: An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005, 44:44-56. (Pubitemid 40461332)
55. Kaplan B: Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001, 64(1):39-56.
56. Kaplan B: Organizational evaluation of medical information resources. In Evaluation methods in medical informatics. Edited by Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. New York: Springer; 1997:255 -280.
57. Wakefield DS, Halbesleben JRB, Ward MM, Qiu Q, Brokel J, Crandall D: Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences. Med Care 2007, 45(9):884-890.
58. Huryk LA: Factors influencing nurses attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J Nurs Manage 2010, 18(5):606 -612.
59. Schectman JM, Schorling JB, Nadkarni MM, Voss JD: Determinants of physician use of an ambulatory prescription expert system. Int J Med Inform 2005, 74(9):711-717. (Pubitemid 41207419)
60. Wixom BH, Todd PA: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform Syst Res 2005, 16 (1):85-102. (Pubitemid 40701110)
61. Hilton A, Skrutkowski M: Translating instruments into other languages: development and testing processes. Cancer Nurs 2002, 25(1):1-7. (Pubitemid 34101400)
62. Otieno OG, Toyama H, Asonuma M, Kanai-Pak M, Naitoh K: Nurses' Views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. J Nurs Adm 2007, 60(2):209-219.
63. Fornell C, Larcker DF: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981, 18(1):39-50.
64. Nunnally J: Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
65. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC: Multivariate data analysis. 6th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998.
66. Wold H: Partial least squares. In Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Volume 6. Edited by Kotz S, Johnson NL. New York: Wiley; 1985:581-591.
67. O'Leary-Kelly SW, Vokurka RJ: The empirical assessment of construct validity. J Oper Manag 1998, 16(4):387-405. (Pubitemid 128408884)
68. Aronsky D, Haug PJ: Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000, 7(1):55-65. (Pubitemid 30041731)
69. Berner ES, Kasiraman RK, Yu F, Ray MN, Houston TK: Data quality in the outpatient setting: impact on clinical decision support systems. In Proceedings of the American medical informatics association 2005; November 30-December 1 2005. Edited by American Medical Informatics Association. Austin: 2005:41-45.
70. Hogan WR, Wagner MM: Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997, 4(5):342-355. (Pubitemid 127433629)
71. Hsieh TC, Kuperman GJ, Jaggi T, et al: Characteristics and consequences of drug-allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004, 11(6):482-491. (Pubitemid 39421732)
72. Marin HF: Nursing informatics: advances and trends to improve health care quality. Int J Med Inform 2007, 76(supl 2):S267-S269.
73. Yi MY, Hwang Y: Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Int J Hum-Comput St 2003, 59(4):431-449.
74. Lluch M: Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies - a literature review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2011, 80(12):849-862.
75. Hsiao JL, Chang HC, Chen RF: A study of factors affecting acceptance of hospital information systems: a nursing perspective. J Nurs Res 2011, 19(2):150-160.
76. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD: Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform 2009, 78(2):115-126.
77. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP: Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Med. Inform 2009, 78(4):219-229.
78. Pare G, Sicotte C, Jacques H: The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc 2006, 13(2):195-205.
79. Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S: Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. In Proceedngs of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences 2003. Edited by IEEE Computer Society. 2005.