An investigation on task-technology fit of mobile nursing information systems for nursing performance

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 265-273

  Hsiao, Ju Ling ^a   Chen, Rai Fu ^a  

^a CHIA NAN UNIVERSITY OF PHARMACY AND SCIENCE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Mobile nursing information systems; Nursing performance; Nursing staffs; Task technology fit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84861332244     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb82c     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Department of Health (DoH) of Taiwan. The Investigation of the Current Status of Computerized Medical Record in Hospitals of Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: DoH; 2005.
2. Hsiao HJ, Li YC, Chen YL, Ko HC. Critical factors for the adoption of mobile nursing information systems in Taiwan: The nursing department administrators' perspective. J Med Syst. 2009; 33(5):369-377.
3. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(1):66-77.
4. Junglas I, Abraham C, Ives B. Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: Understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance. Decis Support Syst. 2009;46(3):634-647.
5. Dwivedi A, Wickramasinghe N, Bali RK, Naguib RNG, Goldberg S. Critical success factors for achieving superior m-health success. Int J Electron Healthc. 2007;3(2):261-278. (Pubitemid 46733373)
6. Lee TT. Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: Early stage of technology implementation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2007;25(5):294-300.
7. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):213-236.
8. Lu YC, Xiao Y, Andrew S, Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(5):409-422. (Pubitemid 40694204)
9. Choi J, Chun J, Lee K, Lee S, Shin D, Hyun S. Mobile nurse: Hand-held information system for point of nursing care. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;74(3):245-254. (Pubitemid 38591636)
10. Department of Health (DoH) of Taiwan. Nurses Act in Taiwan Taipei, Taiwan: DoH; 2007
11. Keogh JK. Professionalization of nursing: Development, difficulties, and solutions. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(1):302-308.
12. Goodhue DL. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manage Sci. 1995;41(12):1827-1844.
13. Goodhue DL. Development and measurement validity of a TTF instrument. Decision Sci. 1998;29(1):105-138.
14. Dishaw MT, Strong DM. Supporting software maintenance with software engineering tools. J Syst Softw. 1998;44(2):107-120.
15. Goodhue DL, Klein BD, March ST. User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Inform Manage. 2000;38(2): 87-101.
16. Staples DS, Seddon P. Testing the technology-to-performance chain model. J Org End User Comput. 2004;16:17-36.
17. Gebauer J, Shaw MJ, Gribbins M. Task-technology fit for mobile information systems. J Inf Technol. 2010;25:259-272.
18. Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Issues and challenges in ubiquitous computing. Commun ACM. 2002;45(12):63-65. (Pubitemid 135700552)
19. Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Research commentary: The next wave of nomadic computing. Inform Syst Res. 2002;13(4):377-388. (Pubitemid 36039703)
20. Balasubramaniam S, Peterson RA, Jarvenpaa SL. Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing. Acad Market Sci. 2002;30(4):348-361. (Pubitemid 40815798)
21. Computerworld. Executive Briefings: The Wireless Corporation. Strategic Insights from the Editors of Computerworld. Framingham, MA: IDG Enterprise; 2003.
22. Agrawal M, Chari K, Sankar R. Demystifying wireless technologies: Navigating through the wireless technology maze. Commun AIS. 2003;12:166-182.
23. Smith HA, Kulatilaka N, Venkatraman N. Developments in IS practice III: Riding the wave: Extracting value from mobile technology. Commun AIS. 2002;8:467-481.
24. Tarasewich P, Nickerson RC, Warkentin M. Issues in mobile e-commerce. Commun AIS. 2002;8:41-64.
25. Zhang JJ, Yuan Y, Archer NP. Driving forces for m-commerce success. In: Shaw M, ed. eBusiness Management: Integration of Web Technologies With Business Models. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. Chapter 4.
26. Gebauer J, Shaw MJ. Success factors and impacts of mobile business applications: Results from a mobile e-procurement study. Int J Electron Comm. 2004;8(3):19-41. (Pubitemid 38616998)
27. Junglas IA, Watson RT. U-commerce: A conceptual extension of e-commerce and m-commerce. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2003). Seattle, WA: ICIS; 2003, 667-677.
28. Liang TP, Wei CP. Introduction to the special issue: Mobile commerce applications. Int J Electron Comm. 2004;8(3):7-17.
29. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C. IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6(3):1-13.
30. El-Gayar OF, Deokar AV, Wills MJ. Evaluating task-technology fit and user performance for an electronic health record system. Int J Healthc Technol Manage. 2010;11(1-2):50-65.
31. Yen DC, Wu C, Cheng F, Huang Y. Determinants of users' intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(5):1-10.
32. Hilton A, Skrutkowski M. Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nurs. 2002;25(1):1-7. (Pubitemid 34101400)
33. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Cai L. Testing differences between bested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychol Methods. 2006;11(1):19-35. (Pubitemid 44084649)
34. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130-149. (Pubitemid 126672841)
35. Kim KH. The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Struct Equat Model. 2005;12(3):368-390. (Pubitemid 41311759)
36. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 1988;16(1):74-94.
37. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
38. Bollen KA. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
39. Haux R, Winter A, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B. Strategic Information Management in Hospitals: An Introduction to Hospital Information Systems. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.
40. Gurses AP, Xiao Y, Hu P. User-designed information tools to support communication and care coordination in a trauma hospital. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(4):667-677.
41. Hong HS, Kim IK, Lee SH, Kim HS. Adoption of a PDA-based home hospice care system for cancer patients. Comput Inform Nurs. 2009;27(6):365-371.
42. Su KW, Liu CL. A mobile nursing information system based on human-computer interaction design for improving quality of nursing. J Med Syst. 2000. http://www.springerlink.com/content/wq1365802212160g/. Published September 9, 2010. Accessed November 24, 2011.