Nurses' acceptance of the decision support computer program for cancer pain management

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 95-104

  Im, Eun Ok ^a   Chee, Wonshik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Clinical decision support system; Evidence evaluation; Nurse; Pain

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EXPERT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ONCOLOGY NURSING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; NEOPLASMS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; ONCOLOGIC NURSING; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33645281691     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200603000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bulecheck GM, McCloskey JC. Nursing interventions: what they are and how to choose them. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987;1(3):63-71.
2. Holzemer WL. The structure of problem solving in simulations. Nurs Res. 1986;35(4):231-236.
3. MacLean SL. The decision-making process in critical care of the aged. Crit Care Nurs Q. 1989;12(1):74-81.
4. Rew L. Intuition: concept analysis of a group phenomenon. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8(2):21-28.
5. Rew L. Intuition: nursing knowledge and the spiritual dimension of persons. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987;3(3):56-68.
6. Schraeder BD, Fischer DK. Using intuitive knowledge in the neonatal intensive care nursery. Holist Nurs Pract. 1987;1(3):45-51.
7. Benner P, Tanner C. Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. Am J Nurs. 1987;87(1):23-31.
8. Benner P. From novice to expert. Am J Nurs. 1982;82(3):402-407.
9. Benner P, Wrubel J. The Primacy of Caring: Stress and Coping in Health and Illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1989.
10. Finkelstein SM, Scudiero A, Lindgren B, Snyder M, Hertz MI. Decision support for the triage of lung transplant recipients on the basis of home-monitoring spirometry and symptom reporting. Heart Lung. 2005;34(3):201-208.
11. Giannone G. Computer-supported weight-based drug infusion concentrations in the neonatal intensive care unit. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(2):100-105.
12. Chang P, Hsu YS, Tzeng YM, Sang YY, Hou IC, Kao WF. The development of intelligent, triage-based, mass-gathering emergency medical service PDA support systems. J Nurs Res. 2004;12(3):227-236.
13. Bellika JG, Hartvigsen G. The oncological nurse assistant: a web-based intelligent oncological nurse advisor. Medinfo. 2004;11(1):573-577.
14. Meyer KE, Sather-Levine B, Laurent-Bopp D, Gruenewald D, Nichol P, Kimmerle M. The impact of clinical information systems research on the future advanced practice nursing. Adv Pract Nurs. 1996;2(3):58-64.
15. Huang HY, Wilkie DJ, Berry DL. Use of a computerized digitizer tablet to score and enter visual analogue scale data. Nurs Res. 1996;45(6):370-372.
16. Dreiseitl S, Binder M. Do physicians value decision support? A look at the effect of decision support systems on physician opinion. Artif Intell Med. 2005;33(1):25-30.
17. Magrabi F, Coiera EW, Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Vickland V. General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(1):1-12.
18. Im EO, Chee W. Decision support computer program for cancer pain management. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(1):12-21.
19. Harding S. Introduction: is there a feminist method? In: Harding S, ed. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1987:1-14.
20. Ford-Gilboe M, Campbell J. The mother-headed single-parent family: a feminist critique of the nursing literature. Nurs Outl. 1996;44(4):173-183.
21. Hall JM, Stevens PE. Rigor in feminist research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1991;13(3):16-29.
22. Young IM. Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1990.
23. Rosser SV. Women's Health-Missing From US Medicine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1994.
24. Reisman Y. Computer-based clinical decision aids. A review of methods and assessment of systems. Med Inform. 1996;21(3):179-197.
25. Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human - Computer Interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1987.
26. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL. Development of a tool measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Chi'88 Conference Proceedings: Human Factors in Computing. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 1988:213-218.
27. Slaughter L, Norman KL, Shneiderman B. Assessing Users' Subjective Satisfaction with the Information System for Youth Services (ISYS). VA Tech Proceedings of Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1995:164-170.
28. McLaughlin FE, Marascuilo LA. Advanced Nursing and Healthcare Research: Quantification Approaches. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990.
29. Woolley N. Adjuncts to the nurse's skills? Advantages and disadvantages of expert systems. Prof Nurse. 1991;6(10): 722-726.
30. O'Neil ES, Dluhy NM, Fortier PJ, Michel HE. Knowledge acquisition, synthesis, and validation: a model for decision support systems. J Adv Nurs. 2004;47(2):134-142.
31. Mallach EG. Decision Support and Data Warehouse Systems. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
32. Bullard MJ, Meurer DP, Colman I, Holrayd BR, Rowe BH. Supporting clinical practice at the bedside using wireless technology. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(11):1186-1192.
33. Ruland CM. A survey about the usefulness of computerized systems to support illness management in clinical practice. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73(11-12):797-805.
34. Im EO, Chee W, Tsai H, Lin L, Cheng C. Internet Cancer Support Groups: a feminist analysis. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28(1):1-7.
35. Sciadas G. Unveiling the digital divide. Connectedness Series. Statistics Canada - Catalogue No. 56F0004MIE. Ontario, Canada: The Minister of Industry; 2002.
36. Barber N. Designing information technology to support prescribing decision making. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(6):450-454.
37. Anderson JG, Aydin C, Jay SJ. Evaluating Healthcare Information Systems: Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
38. Kaplan B. Addressing organizational issues into the evaluation of medical systems. J Am Med Inform. 1997;4(2):94-101.
39. Patel V, Kushniruk AW. Human computer interaction in healthcare. In: Bemmel JH, Musen MA, eds. Handbook of Medical Informatics. Diegem: Springer; 1997:473-493.