Sensorimotor Recalibration Depends on Attribution of Sensory Prediction Errors to Internal Causes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Wilke, Carlo ^a   Synofzik, Matthis ^a,b   Lindner, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ERROR; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION;

CALIBRATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84872873105     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054925     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. von Helmholtz H (1867) Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leipzig: Voss.
2. Frith CD (1992) The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia/Christopher D. Frith. Hove, U.K.; Hillsdale, U.S.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
3. Frith CD, Blakemore S, Wolpert DM, (2000) Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 31: 357-363.
4. von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H, (1950) Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 37: 464-476.
5. Sperry RW, (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43: 482-489.
6. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI, (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882.
7. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M, (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 338-347.
8. Synofzik M, Thier P, Lindner A, (2006) Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one's own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome. J Neurophysiol 96: 1592-1601.
9. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM, (2003) Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13: 146-150.
10. Haarmeier T, Bunjes F, Lindner A, Berret E, Thier P, (2001) Optimizing visual motion perception during eye movements. Neuron 32: 527-535.
11. Cameron BD, Franks IM, Inglis JT, Chua R, (2012) The adaptability of self-action perception and movement control when the limb is passively versus actively moved. Conscious Cogn 21: 4-17.
12. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW, (2010) Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 89-108.
13. Marko MK, Haith AM, Harran MD, Shadmehr R, (2012) Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. J Neurophysiol 108: 1752-63.
14. Franck N, Farrer C, Georgieff N, Marie-Cardine M, Dalery J, et al. (2001) Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158: 454-459.
15. Farrer C, Franck N, Paillard J, Jeannerod M, (2003) The role of proprioception in action recognition. Conscious Cogn 12: 609-619.
16. Wei K, Körding K, (2009) Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101: 655-664.
17. Stetson C, Cui X, Montague PR, Eagleman DM, (2006) Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 51: 651-659.
18. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P, (2002) When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation. Current Biology 12: 834-837.
19. Lutz A, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Varela FJ, (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 1586-1591.
20. Bland A, Mushtaq F, Smith DV, (2011) Exploiting Trial-to-Trial Variability in Multimodal Experiments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 80.
21. Dienes Z, (2011) Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 274-290.
22. Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press. VIII, 477 S. p.
23. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M, (2001) Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13: 2201-2220.
24. Cressman EK, Henriques DY, (2009) Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 102: 3505-3518.
25. Cressman EK, Henriques DY, (2010) Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following exposure to misaligned sensory input. J Neurophysiol 103: 1888-1895.
26. Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
27. Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Lindner A, (2009) Me or not me-an optimal integration of agency cues? Conscious Cogn 18: 1065-1068.
28. Reuschel J, Drewing K, Henriques DY, Rosler F, Fiehler K, (2010) Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry. Exp Brain Res 201: 853-862.
29. Reuschel J, Rosler F, Henriques DY, Fiehler K, (2011) Testing the limits of optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive information of path trajectory. Exp Brain Res 209: 619-630.
30. Synofzik M, Lindner A, Thier P, (2008) The cerebellum updates predictions about the visual consequences of one's behavior. Curr Biol 18: 814-818.
31. Synofzik M, Thier P, Leube DT, Schlotterbeck P, Lindner A, (2010) Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions. Brain 133: 262-271.
32. Fourneret P, Jeannerod M, (1998) Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36: 1133-1140.
33. Bell CC, (1981) An efference copy which is modified by reafferent input. Science 214: 450-453.
34. Crapse TB, Sommer MA, (2008) Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat Rev Neurosci 9: 587-600.
35. Bell CC, (2001) Memory-based expectations in electrosensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 481-487.
36. Tsakiris M, Haggard P, Franck N, Mainy N, Sirigu A, (2005) A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 96: 215-231.
37. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224.
38. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, (2001) Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985.
39. Wolpert DM, Kawato M, (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11: 1317-1329.
40. Lai EJ, Hodgson AJ, Milner TE, (2003) Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field. Exp Brain Res 153: 76-83.
41. Nakanishi J, Schaal S, (2004) Feedback error learning and nonlinear adaptive control. Neural Netw 17: 1453-1465.
42. Fiehler K, Rosler F, Henriques DY, (2010) Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements. Exp Brain Res 203: 485-498.
43. Berniker M, Kording K, (2008) Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci 11: 1454-1461.
44. Körding K, Wolpert DM, (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427: 244-247.
45. Berniker M, Kording KP, (2011) Estimating the relevance of world disturbances to explain savings, interference and long-term motor adaptation effects. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002210.
46. Lenggenhager B, Tadi T, Metzinger T, Blanke O, (2007) Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317: 1096-1099.
47. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W, (1998) The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121: 1603-1630.
48. Preston C, Newport R, (2010) Self-denial and the role of intentions in the attribution of agency. Conscious Cogn 19: 986-998.
49. Izawa J, Shadmehr R, (2011) Learning from sensory and reward prediction errors during motor adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002012.
50. Wilke C, Synofzik M, Lindner A, (2012) The valence of action outcomes modulates the perception of one's actions. Conscious Cogn 21: 18-29.
51. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW, (2006) An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26: 3642-3645.
52. Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, (2000) Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 1771-1788.
53. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR, (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11: R729-732.
54. Lindner A, Thier P, Kircher TT, Haarmeier T, Leube DT, (2005) Disorders of agency in schizophrenia correlate with an inability to compensate for the sensory consequences of actions. Curr Biol 15: 1119-1124.
55. Robinson FR, Noto CT, Bevans SE, (2003) Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey. J Neurophysiol 90: 1235-1244.
56. Fine MS, Thoroughman KA, (2007) Trial-by-trial transformation of error into sensorimotor adaptation changes with environmental dynamics. J Neurophysiol 98: 1392-1404.
57. Haith A, Jackson C, Miall C, Vijayakumar S (2008) Unifying the Sensory and Motor Components of Sensorimotor Adaptation. Neural Information Processing Systems Vancouver, Canada.
58. Cressman EK, Henriques DY, (2011) Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration. Prog Brain Res 191: 91-99.
59. Salomonczyk D, Cressman EK, Henriques DY, (2011) Proprioceptive recalibration following prolonged training and increasing distortions in visuomotor adaptation. Neuropsychologia 49: 3053-3062.
60. Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR, (2011) Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 739-751.
61. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
62. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442.
63. Masson MEJ, Loftus GR, (2003) Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 57: 203-220.
64. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH, (2008) Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 31: 317-338.
65. Torres-Oviedo G, Bastian AJ, (2012) Natural error patterns enable transfer of motor learning to novel contexts. J Neurophysiol 107: 346-356.
66. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, (1996) Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw 9: 1265-1279.