Proprioceptive recalibration following prolonged training and increasing distortions in visuomotor adaptation

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3053-3062

  Salomonczyk, Danielle ^a,b   Cressman, Erin K ^c   Henriques, Denise Y P ^a,b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arm; Motor control; Motor learning; Proprioception; Visuomotor adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION; UNCERTAINTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051795389     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abeele S., Bock O. Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: Different mechanisms for small versus large rotations. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 140(4):407-410.
2. Balitsky-Thompson A.K., Henriques D.Y. Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(3):543-552.
3. Bernier P.M., Chua R., Bard C., Franks I.M. Updating of an internal model without proprioception: A deafferentation study. Neuroreport 2006, 17(13):1421-1425.
4. Brown L.E., Rosenbaum D.A., Sainburg R.L. Limb position drift: Implications for control of posture and movement. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90(5):3105-3118.
5. Cressman E.K., Henriques D.Y. Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102(6):3505-3518.
6. Cressman E.K., Henriques D.Y. Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following exposure to misaligned sensory input. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103(4):1888-1895.
7. Cressman E.K., Salomonczyk D., Henriques D.Y. Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 205(4):533-544.
8. Criscimagna-Hemminger S.E., Shadmehr R. Consolidation patterns of human motor memory. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28(39):9610-9618.
9. Dijkerman H.C., de Haan E.H. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30(2):189-201. (discussion 201-139).
10. Dionne J.K., Henriques D.Y. Interpreting ambiguous visual information in motor learning. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(15). 2, 1-10.
11. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15(1):20-25.
12. Harris C.S. Adaptation to displaced vision: Visual, motor, or proprioceptive change?. Science 1963, 140:812-813.
13. Hay J.C., Pick H.L. Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966, 71(1):150-158.
14. Henriques D.Y., Soechting J.F. Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 150(1):95-108.
15. Ingram H.A., van Donkelaar P., Cole J., Vercher J.L., Gauthier G.M., Miall R.C. The role of proprioception and attention in a visuomotor adaptation task. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 132(1):114-126.
16. Jones S.A., Cressman E.K., Henriques D.Y. Proprioceptive localization of the left and right hands. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):373-383.
17. Kagerer F.A., Contreras-Vidal J.L., Stelmach G.E. Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 115(3):557-561.
18. Kesten H. Accelerated stochastic approximation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1958, 29(1):41-59.
19. Kording K.P., Tenenbaum J.B., Shadmehr R. The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(6):779-786.
20. Krakauer J.W., Ghez C., Ghilardi M.F. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: Consolidation, interference, and forgetting. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(2):473-478.
21. Krakauer J.W., Ghilardi M.F., Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2(11):1026-1031.
22. Krakauer J.W., Pine Z.M., Ghilardi M.F., Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20(23):8916-8924.
23. Martin T.A., Keating J.G., Goodkin H.P., Bastian A.J., Thach W.T. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 1996, 119(Pt. 4):1183-1198.
24. Miall R.C., Wolpert D.M. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Network 1996, 9(8):1265-1279.
25. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Ostry D.J., Darainy M., Mattar A.A., Wong J., Gribble P.L. Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(15):5384-5393.
27. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Prism exposure aftereffects and direct effects for different movement and feedback times. Journal of Motor Behavior 2000, 32(1):83-99.
28. Salomonczyk D., Henriques D.Y., Cressman E.K. Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration: Evidence of separate processes using bimanual transfer. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience 2010.
29. Shadmehr R., Smith M.A., Krakauer J.W. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2010, 33:89-108.
30. Simani M.C., McGuire L.M., Sabes P.N. Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 98(5):2827-2841.
31. Smith M.A., Ghazizadeh A., Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biology 2006, 4(6):e179.
32. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research 1995, 35(17):2503-2522.
33. Tseng Y.W., Diedrichsen J., Krakauer J.W., Shadmehr R., Bastian A.J. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 98(1):54-62.
34. van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology 2002, 12(10):834-837.
35. Wong T., Henriques D.Y. Visuomotor adaptation does not recalibrate kinesthetic sense of felt hand path. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 101(2):614-623.