Spacing Practices: The Communicative Configuration of Organizing Through Space-Times

Communication Theory

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 25-47

  Vásquez, Consuelo ^a   Cooren, François ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SPACING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84872833174     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/comt.12003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Arias, S. (2010). Rethinking space: An outsider's view of the spatial turn. GeoJournal, 75, 29-41. doi: 10.1007/s10708-010-9339-9.
2. Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: "Materializing" organizational communication. In J. P. Walsh, & A. P. Brief (Eds.), The academy of management annals (Vol. 3, pp. 1-64). London, England: Routledge. doi: 10.1080/19416520903047186
3. Axley, S. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428-437. doi: 10.2307/258283
4. Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 1-17. doi: 10.1177/1350508411401946
5. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme (1st ed., Vol. 1). Paris, France: Gallimar.
6. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of every day life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2006). Organising space. In S. Clegg, & M. Kornberger (Eds.), Space, organizations and management theory (pp. 143-162). Slovenian, Copenhague: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
8. Coleman, M., & Agnew, J. A. (2007). The problem with empire. In J. W. Crampton, & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 317-339). Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
9. Cooren, F. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. V. Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81-100). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
11. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. (2004). Speech timing and spacing: The phenomenon of organizational closure. Organization, 11(6), 793-824. doi: 10.1177/1350508404047252
12. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. (2009). Dislocation and stabilization: How to scale up from interactions to organization. In L. L. Putnam, & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 117-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Cooren, F., Brummans, B., & Charrieras, D. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins Sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339-1370. doi: 10.1177/0018726708095707
14. Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D., & Talih, N. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world. Time & Society, 14(2/3), 265-282. doi: 10.1177/0961463X05055138
15. Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Introduction to the special issue: Communication, organizing and organization; an overview. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149-1170. doi: 10.1177/0170840611410836
16. Cooren, F., Taylor, J. R., Matte, F., & Vásquez, C. (2007). A humanitarian organization in action: Organizational discourse as a stable mobile. Discourse and Communication, 1(2), doi:10.1177/1750481307075996.
17. Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2008). Ten good reasons for assuming a "practice lens" in organization studies. Paper presented at the III Organizational learning, knowledge & capabilities (OLKC) conference, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
18. Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00166.x
19. Craig, R. T. (2007). Pragmatism in the field of communication theory. Communication Theory, 17(2), 125-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00292.x
20. Crang, M., & Thrift, N. (2000). Thinking space. London, England; New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
22. Doolin, B. (2003). Narratives of change: Discourse, technology and organization. Organization, 10(4), 751-770. doi: 10.1177/13505084030104002
23. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1093/ct/14.1.5
24. Fauré, B. (2007). Les propriétés organisantes du langage des chiffres. Actes de calculs et esthétique des comptes: le cas de la fabrique du budget. COMMposite, 2007(1), 74-108.
25. Foucault, M. (1980). Questions on geography. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 63-77). London, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MA; Boulder, CO; New York, NY; Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
28. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29. Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2005). Place, space and time: contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27(5), 657-676.
30. Hennion, A. (1993). La passion musicale. Une sociologie de la médiation. Paris, France: Métaillé. Heritage.
31. Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis (pp. 191-222). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Jones, G., McLean, C., & Quattrone, P. (2004). Spacing and timing. Organization, 11(6), 723-741. doi: 10.1177/1350508404047248
33. Kornberger, M, & Clegg, S. (2004). Bringing space back in: organizing the generative building. Organisation Studies 25(7): 1095-1115.
34. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of associations. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264-280). London, England: Routledge.
35. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social- an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37. Latour, B. (2007). Résumé d'une enquête sur les modes d'existence ou bref éloge de la civilisation qui vient. Paper presented at the au colloque Exercise de métaphysique empirique, Cérisy.
38. Latour, B. (2008, May). What's organizing? A meditation on the bust of Emilio Bootme in praise of Jim Taylor. Paper presented at the au colloque "What is an organization? Agency, Materiality and Discourse, "Montreal.
39. Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, England: Blackwell.
40. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. Massey, D. (1999). Space-time, 'science' and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24, 261-276.
42. Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler, 86 B(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x
43. Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, England; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India: Sage.
44. Massey, D. (2007). World city. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
45. McCormack, D. P. (2008). Thinking spaces for research creation. Inflexions, 1(1) Available from: www.inflexions.com [Accessed 10 January 2010].
46. McDonald, S. (2005). Studying actions in context: A qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 455-473. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056923
47. McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1-2), 21-41.
48. McPhee, Robert D., & Pamela, Zaug. (2001). Organizational Theory, Organizational Communication, Organizational Knowledge, and Problematic Integration. Journal of Communication, 51(3): 574-591.
49. Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). London, England: Sage.
50. Putnam, L. L., & McPhee, R. (2009). Theory building: Comparisons of CCO orientations. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 187-208). New York: Routledge.
51. Putnam, L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2009). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
52. Putnam, L., Nicotera, A. M., & McPhee, R. (2009). Introduction. In L. Putnam, & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Routledge.
53. Quattrone, P. (2004). Accounting for God. Accounting and accountability practices in the society of Jesus (Italy, 16th-17th centuries). Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 647-683.
54. Rapper, J., & Livingstone, D. (1995). Development of a geomorphological spatial model using object-oriented design. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(4): 359-384.
55. Robichaud, D. (2006). Steps toward a relational view of agency. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. V. Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 101-114). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Searle, J.R. (1995). La redécouverte de l'esprit, (tr.fr. Cl.Tiercelin). Paris, France: Gallimard.
57. Shatzki, T. R. (1991). Spatial ontology and explanation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4), 650-670. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01713.x
58. Shome, R. (2003). Space matters: The power and practice of space. Communication Theory, 13(1), 39-56. doi: 10.1093/ct/13.1.39
59. Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: A case of bridge-building. Organization, 7(2), 311-327.
60. Taylor, J. R. (2006). Coorientation: A conceptual framework. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Practical approaches to research into the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 141-156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2011). The situated organization: Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York, NY: Routledge.
63. Thrift, N. (2004). Thick time. Organization, 11(6), 873-880. doi: 10.1177/1350508404047255
64. Thrift, N. (2007). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
65. Vásquez, C. (2009). Espacer l'organisation: trajectoires d'un projet de diffusion de la science et de la technologie au Chili. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Communication, Université de Montréal.
66. Vásquez, C., & Cooren, F. (2011). Passion in action: An analysis of translation and treason. In P. Quattrone, C. McLean, F. Puyou, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond. London, England; New York, NY: Routledge.
67. Vásquez, C., Brummans, B., & Groleau, C. (2012). Notes from the field: Organizational shadowing as framing. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7(2), 144-165. doi: 10.1108/17465641211253075
68. Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London, England; New York, NY: Routledge.
69. Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H., & Kamsteeg, F. (Eds.) (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life. London, England: Sage.