Neural network prediction of load from the morphology of trabecular bone

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 5260-5276

  Zadpoor, Amir Abbas ^a   Campoli, Gianni ^a   Weinans, Harrie ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Load prediction; Remodeling; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

BONE ADAPTATION; BONE TISSUE; DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FORWARD PROBLEM; LOAD PREDICTIONS; LOADING PARAMETERS; NETWORK PREDICTION; NON-LINEAR SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION; NONUNIQUENESS; NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES; REMODELING; TISSUE ADAPTATION; TRABECULAR BONES;

ALGORITHMS; BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORECASTING; LOADING; MORPHOLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS; TISSUE;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 84872596819     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.049     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Galbusera F., Fantigrossi A., Raimondi M., Assietti R., Sassi M., Fornari M. Biomechanics of the C5-C6 spinal unit before and after placement of a disc prosthesis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2006, 5:253-261.
2. Levenston M.E., Beaupre G.S., Schurman D.J., Carter D.R. Computer simulations of stress-related bone remodeling around noncemented acetabular components. J. Arthroplast. 1993, 8:595-605.
3. Orr T.E., Beaupre G.S., Carter D.R., Schurman D.J. Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. J. Arthroplast. 1990, 5:191-200.
4. Geris L., Sloten J., Oosterwyck H. Connecting biology and mechanics in fracture healing: an integrated mathematical modeling framework for the study of nonunions. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2010, 1-12.
5. Shefelbine S.J., Augat P., Claes L., Simon U. Trabecular bone fracture healing simulation with finite element analysis and fuzzy logic. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:2440-2450.
6. Vetter A., Liu Y., Witt F., Manjubala I., Sander O., Epari D.R., Fratzl P., Duda G.N., Weinkamer R. The mechanical heterogeneity of the hard callus influences local tissue strains during bone healing: a finite element study based on sheep experiments. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:517-523.
7. Weis J.A., Miga M.I., Granero-Molto F., Spagnoli A. A finite element inverse analysis to assess functional improvement during the fracture healing process. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:557-562.
8. Hazelwood S.J., Bruce Martin R., Rashid M.M., Rodrigo J.J. A mechanistic model for internal bone remodeling exhibits different dynamic responses in disuse and overload. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:299-308.
9. Ozcivici E., Garman R., Chung H., Xu S., Judex S. High-frequency oscillatory motions applied to the tibia during disuse normalize trabecular stress distributions. J. Biomech. 2006, 39. S471-S471.
10. Tanck E., Ruimerman R., Huiskes R. Trabecular architecture can remain intact for both disuse and overload enhanced resorption characteristics. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2631-2637.
11. Vahdati A., Rouhi G. A model for mechanical adaptation of trabecular bone incorporating cellular accommodation and effects of microdamage and disuse. Mech. Res. Commun. 2009, 36:284-293.
12. Bona M.A., Martin L.D., Fischer K.J. A contact algorithm for density-based load estimation. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:636-644.
13. Bona M.A., Martin L.D., Fischer K.J. Density-based load estimation using two-dimensional finite element models: a parametric study. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 9:221-229.
14. Campoli G., Weinans H., Zadpoor A.A. Computational load estimation of the femur. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 10:108-119.
15. Christen P., van Rietbergen B., Lambers F.M., Müller R., Ito K. Bone morphology allows estimation of loading history in a murine model of bone adaptation. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2012, 11:483-492.
16. Fischer K.J., Bastidas J.A., Pfaeffle H.J., Towers J.D. A method for estimating relative bone loads from CT data with application to the radius and the ulna. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2003, 4:397-403.
17. Fischer K.J., Jacobs C.R., Carter D.R. Computational method for determination of bone and joint loads using bone-density distributions. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:1127-1135.
18. Fischer K.J., Jacobs C.R., Levenston M.E., Cody D.D., Carter D.R. Bone load estimation for the proximal femur using single energy quantitative CT data. Comput. Method. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 1:233-245.
19. M.A. Bona, A contact algorithm for density-based load estimation, in: Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Kansas, 2003.
20. Fischer K.J., Eckstein F., Decker C. Density-based load estimation predicts altered femoral load directions for coxa vara and coxa valga. J. Musculoskelet. Res. 1999, 3:83-92.
21. Hambli R. Application of neural networks and finite element computation for multiscale simulation of bone remodeling. J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132:114502.
22. Hambli R. Apparent damage accumulation in cancellous bone using neural networks. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 4:868-878.
23. Zadpoor A.A., Sinke J., Benedictus R. Formability prediction of high strength aluminum sheets. Int. J. Plasticity 2009, 25:2269-2297.
24. Barron A. Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2002, 39:930-945.
25. Hambli R., Chamekh A., Bel Hadj Salah H. Real-time deformation of structure using finite element and neural networks in virtual reality applications. Finite Elem. Anal. Des 2006, 42:985-991.
26. Unger J.F., Konke C. Coupling of scales in a multiscale simulation using neural networks. Comput. Struct. 2008, 86:1994-2003.
27. Fischer K.J., Jacobs C.R., Levenston M.E., Carter D.R. Different loads can produce similar bone density distributions. Bone 1996, 19:127-135.
28. Huiskes R., Ruimerman R., van Lenthe G., Janssen J. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000, 405:704-706.
29. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Grootenboer H., Dalstra M., Fudala B., Slooff T. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J. Biomech. 1987, 20:1135-1150.
30. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1992, 274:124.
31. Van Rietbergen B., Weinans H., Huiskes R., Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:69-81.
32. Weinans H., Huiskes R., Grootenboer H. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J. Biomech. 1992, 25:1425-1441.
33. Mullender M., Huiskes R., Weinans H. A physiological approach to the simulation of bone remodeling as a self-organizational control process. J. Biomech. 1994, 27:1389-1394.
34. Barron A.R. Universal approximation bounds for superpositions of a sigmoidal function. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1993, 39:930-945.
35. Hopfield J.J. Artificial neural networks. IEEE Circuits Devices Mag. 1988, 4:3-10.
36. Wilamowski B.M. Neural network architectures and learning algorithms. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2009, 3:56-63.
37. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., Duda G. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:859-871.
38. Graichen F., Bergmann G., Rohlmann A. Hip endoprosthesis for in vivo measurement of joint force and temperature. J. Biomech. 1999, 32:1113-1117.
39. Kaufman K.R., Kovacevic N., Irby S.E., Colwell C.W. Instrumented implant for measuring tibiofemoral forces. J. Biomech. 1996, 29:667-671.
40. Garner B.A., Pandy M.G. Musculoskeletal model of the upper limb based on the visible human male dataset. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 4:93-126.
41. Klein Horsman M., Koopman H., Van der Helm F., Prose L.P., Veeger H. Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clin. Biomech. 2007, 22:239-247.
42. Shelburne K.B., Pandy M.G. A musculoskeletal model of the knee for evaluating ligament forces during isometric contractions. J. Biomech. 1997, 30:163-176.
43. Nikooyan A.A., Zadpoor A.A. An improved cost function for modeling of muscle activity during running. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:984-987.
44. Zadpoor A.A., Asadi Nikooyan A., Reza Arshi A. A model-based parametric study of impact force during running. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:2012-2021.
45. Zadpoor A.A., Nikooyan A.A. A mechanical model to determine the influence of masses and mass distribution on the impact force during running: a discussion. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:388-390.
46. Zadpoor A.A., Nikooyan A.A. Modeling muscle activity to study the effects of footwear on the impact forces and vibrations of the human body during running. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:186-193.
47. Nikooyan A., Veeger H., Westerhoff P., Graichen F., Bergmann G., Van der Helm F. Validation of the Delft shoulder and Elbow model using in-vivo glenohumeral joint contact forces. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:3007-3014.
48. Nikooyan A.A., Zadpoor A.A. Mass-spring-damper modelling of the human body to study running and hopping - An overview. J. Eng. Med. 2011, 225:1121-1135.
49. Weinans H., Huiskes R., Grootenboer H.J. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J. Orthop. Res. 1992, 10:845-853.