Apparent damage accumulation in cancellous bone using neural networks

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 868-878

  Hambli, Ridha ^a  

^a Institut PRISME   (France)

Author keywords

Apparent damage; Fatigue; Finite element; Neural network; Trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

APPARENT DAMAGE; BONE MATERIALS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONTINUUM LEVEL; CYCLIC LOADINGS; DAMAGE ACCUMULATION; DAMAGE EVOLUTION; DAMAGE REPAIR; DAMAGE SIMULATION; ENHANCED FINITE ELEMENTS; FATIGUE; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT CODES; INPUT-OUTPUT DATA; LOADING CONDITION; MICRO CT; MULTI-SCALE APPROACHES; NEURAL NETWORK MODEL; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; TISSUE DAMAGE; TRABECULAR BONE ARCHITECTURE; TRABECULAR BONES;

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FATIGUE DAMAGE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL METHODS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOACCUMULATION; BONE DENSITY; BONE INJURY; BONE TISSUE; CANCELLOUS BONE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRABECULAR BONE; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; BONE REMODELING; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79956361348     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bowman S.M., Guo X.E., Cheng D.W., Keaveny T.M., Gibson L.J., Hayes W.C., McMahon T.A. Creep contributes to the fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 1998, 120:647-654.
2. Burr D.B. Remodeling and the repair of fatigue damage. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1993, 53(Suppl. 1):S75-S81.
3. Chaboche J.L. Continuum damage mechanics a tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 1981, 64:233-247.
4. Choi K., Goldstein S.A. A comparison of the fatigue behavior of human trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J. Biomech. 1992, 25(12):1371-1381.
5. Cowin S.C. Mechanosensation and fluid transport in living bone. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2002, 2(3):256-260.
6. Dendorfer S., Maier H.J., Hammer J. Anisotropy of the fatigue behaviour of cancellous bone. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(3):636-641.
7. Dendorfer S., Maier H.J., Hammer J. Fatigue damage in cancellous bone: an experimenytal approach from continuum to micro scale. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 2:113-119.
8. Fazzalari N.L., Kuliwaba J.S., Forwood M.R. Cancellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur: influence of age and osteoarthritis on damage morphology and regional distribution. Bone 2002, 31(6):697-702.
9. Guo X.D.E., McMahon T.A., Keaveny T.M., Hayes W.C., Gibson L.J. Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in trabecular bone under cyclic loading. J. Biomech. 1994, 27(2):145-155.
10. Haddock S.M., Yeh O.C., Mummaneni P.V., Rosenberg W.S., Keaveny T.M. Similarity in the fatigue behavior of trabecular bone across site and species. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:181-187.
11. Hambli R. Statistical damage analysis of extrusion processes using finite element method and neural networks simulation. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2009, 45(10):640-649.
12. Hambli R., Katerchi H., Benhamou C.L. Multiscale methodology for bone remodelling simulation using coupled finite element and neural network computation. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2010, 10.1007/s10237-010-0222-x.
13. Hambli R., Soulat D., Gasser A., Benhamou C.L. Strain-damage coupled algorithm for cancellous bone mechano-regulation with spatial function influence. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2009, 198(33-36):2673-2682. 1.
14. Harrigan T.P., Jasty M., Mann R.W., Harris W.H. Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone. J. Biomech. 1988, 21:269-275.
15. Hernandez C.J., Beaupré G.S., Keller T.S., Carter D.R. The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone 2001, 29:74-78.
16. Hernandez C.J., Gupta A., Keaveny T.M. A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21(8):1248-1255.
17. Hollister S.J., Fyhrie D.P., Jepsen K.J., Goldstein S.A. Application of homogenization theory to the study of trabecular bone mechanics. J. Biomech. 1991, 24:825-839.
18. Homminga J., Van-Rietbergen B., Lochmueller E.-M., Weinans H., Eckstein F., Huiskes R. The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. Bone 2004, 34(3):510-516.
19. Hornik K. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw. 1991, 4:251-257.
20. Jenkins W.M. An introduction to neural computing for the structural engineer. Struct. Eng. 1997, 75(3):38-41.
21. Kosmopoulos V., Schizas C., Keller T.S. Modeling the onset and propagation of trabecular bone microdamage during low-cycle fatigue. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:515-522.
22. Lemaitre J. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 1985, 107:83-89.
23. Makiyama M., Vajjhala S., Gibson L.J. Analysis of crack growth in a 3d voronoi structure: A model for fatigue in low density trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124(5):512-520.
24. Martin R.B., Burr D.R., Sharkey N.A. Skeletal Tissue Mechanics 1998, Springer, New York.
25. McNamara L.M., Prendergast J.P. Bone remodeling algorithms incorporating both stain and microdamage stimuli. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(6):1381-1391.
26. Michel M.C., Guo X.E., Gibson L.J., McMahon T.A., Hayes W.C. Compressive fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 1993, 26:453-463.
27. Moore T.L.A., Gibson L.J. Fatigue of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2003, 125:761-768.
28. Morgan E.F., Yeh O.C., Keaveny T.M. Damage in trabecular bone at small strains. Eur. J. Morphol. 2005, 42(1-2):13-21.
29. Nagaraja S., Couse T.L., Guldberg R.E. Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(4):707-716.
30. Pattin C.A., Caler W.E., Carter D.R. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 1996, 29:69-79.
31. Prendergast P.J., Taylor D. Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation. J. Biomech. 1994, 27(8):1067-1076.
32. Rafiq M.Y., Bugmann G., Easterbrook D.J. Neural network design for engineering applications. Comput. Struct. 2001, 79(17):1541-1552.
33. Rapillard L., Charlebois M., Zysset P.K. Compressive fatigue behavior of human vertebral trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2133-2139.
34. Sobelman O.S., Gibeling J.C., Stover S.M., Hazelwood S.J., Yeh O.C., Shelton D.R., Martin R.B. Do microcracks decrease or increase fatigue resistance in cortical bone?. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1295-1303.
35. Taylor D. Microcrack growth parameters for compact bone deduced from stiffness variations. J. Biomech. 1998, 31:587-592.
36. Taylor M., Cotton J., Zioupos P. Finite element simulation of the fatigue behaviour of cancellous bone. Meccanica 2002, 37:419-429.
37. Taylor D., Lee T.C. A crack growth model for the simulation of fatigue in bone. Int. J. Fatigue 2003, 2:387-395.
38. Viceconti M., Taddei F., Jan S.V.S., Leardini A., Cristofolini A., Stea S., Baruffaldi F., Baleani M. Multiscale modelling of the skeleton for the prediction of the risk of fracture. Clin. Biomech. 2008, 23:845-852.
39. Wang X., Masse D.B., Leng Huijie, Hess K.P., Ross R.D., Roeder R.K., Niebur G.L. Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(15):3397-3403.
40. Wenzel T.E., Schaffler M.B., Fyhrie D.P. In vivo trabecular microcracks in human vertebral bone. Bone 1996, 19:89-95.
41. Yeni Y.N., Hou F.J., Vashishth D., Fyhrie D.P. Trabecular shear stress in human vertebral cancellous bone: intra- and inter-individual variations. J. Biomech. 2001, 34(10):1341-1346.
42. Yoo A., Jasiuk I. Couple-stress moduli of a trabecular bone idealized as a 3D periodic cellular network. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2241-2252.
43. Zioupos P., Wang X.T., Currey J.D. Experimental and theoretical quantification of the development of damage in fatigue tests of bone and antler. J. Biomech. 1996, 29(8):989-1002.