The impact of cognitive anchors on information-sharing behavior

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 45-49

  Kimmerle, Joachim ^a   Cress, Ulrike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872577303     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0144     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chen YF. Auction fever: Exploring informational social influences on bidder choices. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:411-416.
2. LaRose R, Kim J. Share, steal or buy? A social cognitive perspective of music downloading. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2007; 10:267-277.
3. Lin CF, Wang HF. A decision-making process model of young online shoppers. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:267-277.
4. Stefanone MA, Lackaff D, Rosen D. Contingencies of selfworth and social-networking-site behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:41-49.
5. Jian G, Jeffres LW. Understanding employees' willingness to contribute to shared electronic databases: A three-dimensional framework. Communication Research 2006; 33:242-261.
6. Kalman M, Monge P, Fulk J, et al. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research 2002; 29:125-154.
7. Bonacich P. Communication dilemmas in social networks: An experimental study. American Sociological Review 1990; 55:448-459.
8. Cabrera A, Cabrera EF. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies 2002; 23:687-710.
9. Cheshire C. Selective incentives and generalized information exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly 2007; 70:82-100.
10. Cress U, Kimmerle J. Endowment heterogeneity and identifiability in the information-exchange dilemma. Computers in Human Behavior 2008; 24:862-874.
11. Cress U, Kimmerle J, Hesse FW. Impact of temporal extension, synchronicity, and group size on computer-supported information exchange. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:731-737.
12. Hollingshead AB, Fulk J, Monge P. (2002) Fostering intranet knowledge sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. In Hinds P, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 335- 355.
13. Kimmerle J, Cress U. Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2008; 3:85-97.
14. Chang C-W, Wu C-R, Liao C-C. The virtual cooperation platform in enterprise and supplier cooperation models. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2010; 13:473-475.
15. Wu C-R, Chang C-W, Chen C-C. Evaluate collaborative design semiconductor industry statistical process control based on GSDM. Journal of Grey System 2010; 22:275-280.
16. Wu C-R, Chang C-W, Liao C-C. Selection of collaborative technology used by software contractors. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 2010; 38:731-737.
17. Cress U, Kimmerle J. Guidelines and feedback in information exchange: The impact of behavioral anchors and descriptive norms in a social dilemma. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2007; 11:42-53.
18. Kahneman D. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992; 51:296-312.
19. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185:1124-1131.
21. Kimmerle J, Wodzicki K, Jarodzka H, et al. Value of information, behavioral guidelines, and social value orientation in an information-exchange dilemma. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2011; 15: 173-186.
22. Reno RR, Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA. The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993; 64:104-112.
23. Wodzicki K, Schwammlein E, Cress U, et al. Does the type of anonymity matter? The impact of visualization on information sharing in online groups. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:157-160.
24. Kimmerle J, Cress U, Hesse FW. An interactional perspective on group awareness: Alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?). International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 2007; 65:899-910.
25. Cress U, Kimmerle J, Hesse FW. Information exchange with shared databases as a social dilemma: The effect of metaknowledge, bonus systems, and costs. Communication Research 2006; 33:370-390.
26. Kimmerle J, Cress U. Visualization of group members' participation: How information presentation formats support information exchange. Social Science Computer Review2009; 27:243-261.
27. Mussweiler T. The durability of anchoring effects. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001; 31:431-442.
28. Mussweiler T, Strack F. Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1999; 35:136-164.