Share, steal, or buy? A social cognitive perspective of music downloading

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 267-277

  LaRose, Robert ^a   Kim, Junghyun ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; MALE; MUSIC; NORMAL HUMAN; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; THEFT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPLICITY; DATA COLLECTION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; INTERNET; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MORALS; MUSIC; PERSONALITY; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL CONFORMITY; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; THEFT;

EID: 34249017245     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9959     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. LaRose R., & Eastin M.S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 48:358-377.
2. LaRose, R., Lin C.A., & Eastin M.S. (2003). Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology 5:225-253.
3. Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L., & Rosengren, K.I.E. (1985). Uses and gratifications research: the past ten years. In K. Rosengren, L. Wenner & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. 11-37). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:48-87.
7. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:248-287.
8. Riley, J.L. (2005). Copyfight. Wall Street Journal November 26:A10.
9. Fowler, G.A. (2006). Estimates of copyright piracy losses vary greatly. Wall Street Journal June 2:A13.
10. Garrity, B. (2005). Anticipated boom was a bust. Billboard December 24:117:28.
11. LaRose, R., Lai, Y.J., Lange, R. et al. (2005). Sharing or piracy? An exploration of downloading behavior. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11.
12. Yanovitzky, I., & Rimal, R.N. (2006). Communication and normative influence: an introduction to the special issue. Communication Theory 6:1-6.
13. Bandura, A. (1999). A sociocognitive analysis of substance abuse: an agentic perspective. Psychological Science 10:214-217.
14. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179-211.
15. Conner, M., & Armitage, C. (1998). The theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for future research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1429-1464.
16. Sparks, P., & Guthrie, C.A. (1998). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: a useful addition or an unhelpful artifice? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1393-1410.
17. Parker, D., Manstead, A.S.R., & Stradling, S.G. (1995). Extending the theory of planned behavior - the role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology 34: 127-137.
18. Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Current Psychology 22:218-233.
19. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality 25:285-301.
20. Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6:107-122.
21. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A. et al. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: a field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology 37:111-128.
22. Bagozzi, R.P., & Kimmel, S.K. (1995). A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal directed behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology 34:437-461.
23. Arbuckle, J.L. (2005). Amos 6.0. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
24. Raykov, T., Tomer, A., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1991). Reporting structural equation modeling results in psychology and aging: some proposed guidelines. Psychology and Aging 6:499-503.
25. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107:238-246.
26. Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of size effects. Psychological Bulletin 107:256-259.
27. MacCallum, R.C., Brown, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1:130-139.
28. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision-making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1355-1374.
29. Bargh, J.A., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1994). Environmental control of goal directed action: automatic and strategic contingencies between situation and behavior. In: Spaulding WD ed. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 71-124.