Associations Among Teacher Communication Behaviors, Student Interest, and Engagement: A Validity Test

Communication Education

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 86-96

  Mazer, Joseph P ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Engagement; Scale Development; Student Interest; Teacher Clarity; Teacher Immediacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872542411     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2012.731513     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen, J. F. 1979. "Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness". In Communication yearbook 3, Edited by: Nimmo, D. 543-559. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen, P. A. and Andersen, J. F. 1982. "Nonverbal immediacy in instruction". In Communication in the classroom, Edited by: Barker, L. 98-120. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Bruner, J. S. 1977. The process of education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. doi:10.1037/h0046016
5. Chesebro, J. L. 2003. Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52, 135-147. doi:10.1080/03634520302471
6. Christophel, D. 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340. doi:10.1080/03634529009378813
7. Comadena, M. E., Hunt, S. K., & Simonds, C. J. 2007. The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24, 241-248. doi:10.1080/08824090701446617
8. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
9. DeVellis, R. F. 2003. Scale development: Theory and applications, 2nd ed, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Frymier, A. B. 1993. The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17. doi:10.1080/08934219309367556
11. Frymier, A. B. 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144. doi:10.1080/01463379409369922
12. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. 1999. The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1-12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
13. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. L. 1996. The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181-199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
14. Glaser-Zikuda, M., & Fuss, S. 2008. Impact of teacher competencies on student emotions: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 4, 136-147. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.013
15. Greenwood, C. R. 1991. Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57: 521-534.
16. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. 1997. The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustration: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92
17. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed, New York, NY: Guilford.
18. Krapp, A., Hidi, S. and Renninger, K. A. 1992. "Interest, learning, and development". In The role of interest in learning and development, Edited by: Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S. and Krapp, A. 3-25. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
20. Mazer, J. P. (in press). Validity of the student interest and engagement scales: Associations with student learning outcomes. Communication Studies.
21. Mazer, J. P. 2012. Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99-125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
22. McCroskey, J. C. 1994. "Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication". In 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication, Edited by: Morreale, S. and Brooks, M. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
23. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A. 1996. Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211. doi:10.1080/03634529609379049
24. McGarity, J. R., & Butts, D. P. 1984. The relationship among teacher classroom management behavior, student engagement, and student achievement of middle and high school science students of varying aptitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 55-61. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210107
25. Mehrabian, A. 1981. Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26. Mitchell, M. 1993. Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
27. Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B. and Beebe, S. A. 2006. "Theorizing about instructional communication". In Handbook of instructional communication, Edited by: Mottet, T. P., Richmond, V. P. and McCroskey, J. C. 255-282. Boston, MA: Pearson.
28. National Center for Educational Statistics. 2010. The condition of education [Internet]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe
29. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
30. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S. and McCroskey, J. C. 1987. "The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning". In Communication yearbook 10, Edited by: McLaughlin, M. 574-590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. E. 2003. Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515. doi:10.1080/01463370309370170
32. Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. 1996. Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305. doi:10.1080/03634529609379059
33. Rosenshine, B. V. 1979. "Content, time and direct instruction". In Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications, Edited by: Peterson, P. and Walberg, H. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
34. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchland, G., & Kindermann, T. 2008. Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765-781. doi:10.1037/a0012840
35. Titsworth, B. S. 2001a. The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational cues, and students' notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 283-297. doi:10.1080/03634520109379256
36. Titsworth, B. S. 2001b. Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students' affective learning. Communication Studies, 52: 169-180.
37. Titsworth, S. and Mazer, J. P. 2010. "Clarity in teaching and learning: Conundrums, consequences, and opportunities". In The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction, Edited by: Fassett, D. L. and Warren, J. T. 241-262. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Titsworth, S., Novak, D. R., Hunt, S. K., & Meyer, K. R. 2004, May. The effects of teacher clarity on affective and cognitive learning: A causal model of clear teaching behaviors. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
39. Tobias, S. 1994. Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64: 37-54.
40. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. 2005. Student interest: A two-study re-examination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53, 71-86. doi:10.1080/01463370500055996
41. Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. 2001. An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342. doi:10.1080/03634520109379259
42. Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R. and Allen, M. 2004. A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 71: 184-207.
43. Woolfolk, A. E. and McCune-Nicolich, L. 1984. Educational psychology for teachers, 2nd ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.