Paying the price works: Increasing goal-state access cost improves problem solving and mitigates the effect of interruption

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 160-178

  Morgan, Phillip L ^a   Patrick, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Access cost; Interruption; Memory for goals; Planning; Problem solving; Soft constraints

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; COST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MOTIVATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; COMMERCE; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872503085     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.702117     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Altmann, E. M. and Trafton, G. J. 2002. Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26: 39-83. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2601_2)
2. Altmann, E. M. and Trafton, G. J. Task interruption: Resumption lag and the role of cues. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.42-47. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Altmann, E. M. and Trafton, J. G. 2007. Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14: 1079-1084. (doi:10.3758/BF03193094)
4. Anderson, J. R. 1990. The adaptive character of thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Anderson, J. R. 1993. Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1): 33-44. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35)
6. Anderson, J. R. and Douglass, S. 2001. Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the cost of goal retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27: 1331-1346. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1331)
7. Anderson, J. R., Kushmerick, N. and Lebiere, C. 1993. "The Tower of Hanoi and goal structures". In Rules of the mind, Edited by: Anderson, J. R. 121-142. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Anderson, J. R. and Lebiere, C. 1998. The atomic components of thought, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Anderson, J. R. and Milson, R. 1989. Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96: 703-719. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.703)
10. Anzai, Y. and Simon, H. 1979. The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86: 124-140. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.124)
11. Atwood, M. E. and Polson, P. P. 1976. A process model for water jug problems. Cognitive Psychology, 8: 191-216. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90023-2)
12. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M. and Pelz, J. B. 1995. Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1): 66-80. (doi:10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66)
13. Card, S. K., English, W. K. and Burr, B. J. 1978. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21: 601-613. (doi:10.1080/00140137808931762)
14. Cary, M. and Carlson, R. A. 2001. Distributing working memory resources during problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27: 836-848. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.836)
15. Chater, N. and Oaksford, M. 1999. Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(2): 57-65. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01273-X)
16. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. and Horvitz, E. 2001. "Notification, disruption and memory: Effects of messaging interruptions on memory and performance". In Human-computer interaction-INTERACT 2001, Edited by: Hirose, M. 263-269. Tokyo, Japan: IOS Press, IFIP.
17. Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E. and Horvitz, E. Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. OZCHI 2000 conference proceedings. Edited by: Paris, C., Ozkan, N., Howard, S. and Lu, S. pp.356-361. Sydney, Australia
18. Davies, S. P. 2003. Initial and concurrent planning in solutions to well-structured problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A: 1147-1164.
19. Delaney, P. F., Ericsson, A. K. and Knowles, M. A. 2004. Immediate and sustained effects of planning in a problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30: 1219-1234. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1219)
20. Edwards, M. B. and Gronlund, S. D. 1998. Task interruption and its effects on memory. Memory, 6: 665-687. (doi:10.1080/741943375)
21. Ericcson, K. A. 1974. Problem-solving behavior with the 8-puzzle II: Distribution of latencies (Report No. 432), Stockholm, Sweden: University of Stockholm, Department of Psychology.
22. Franke, J., Daniels, J. and McFarlane, D. Recovering context after interruption. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Edited by: Gray, W. and Schunn, C. pp.310-315. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Fu, W.-T. 2011. A dynamic context model of interactive behavior. Cognitive Science, 35: 874-904. (doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01173.x)
24. Fu, W.-T. and Gray, W. D. Memory versus perceptual-motor tradeoffs in a blocks world task. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.154-159. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Gillie, T. and Broadbent, D. 1989. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50: 243-250. (doi:10.1007/BF00309260)
26. Gray, W. D. and Boehm-Davis, D. A. 2000. Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6: 322-335. (doi:10.1037/1076-898X.6.4.322)
27. Gray, W. D. and Fu, W.-T. 2001. Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head: Implications of rational analysis for interface design. CHI Letters, 3(1): 112-119.
28. Gray, W. D. and Fu, W.-T. 2004. Soft constraints in interactive behaviour: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28: 359-383.
29. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T. and Schoelles, M. J. 2006. The soft constraints hypothesis. A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behaviour. Psychological Review, 113: 461-482. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461)
30. Hayes-Roth, B. and Hayes-Roth, F. 1979. A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3: 275-310. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0304_1)
31. Hodgetts, H. M. and Jones, D. M. 2006a. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32(5): 1120-1132. (doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1120)
32. Hodgetts, H. M. and Jones, D. M. 2006b. Interruption of the Tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1): 103-115. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.103)
33. MacKenzie, I. S. 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1): 91-139. (doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3)
34. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Graham, T. and Rall, E. 2004. Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the cost of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5): 533-547. (doi:10.1002/acp.1002)
35. McFarlane, D. C. 2002. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17: 63-139. (doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2)
36. McFarlane, D. C. and Latorella, K. A. 2002. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17: 1-61. (doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_1)
37. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K. H. 1960. Plans and the structure of behavior, New York, NY: Holt.
38. Monk, C. A., Trafton, J. G. and Boehm-Davis, D. A. 2008. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14: 299-313. (doi:10.1037/a0014402)
39. Morgan, P. L., Patrick, J., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L. and Patrick, T. 2009. Improving memory after interruption: Exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4): 291-306. (doi:10.1037/a0018008)
40. Oaksford, M. and Chater, N. 1998. Rationality in an uncertain world, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
41. O'Hara, K. P. and Payne, S. J. 1998. The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35: 34-70. (doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0676)
42. O'Hara, K. P. and Payne, S. J. 1999. Planning and the user interface: The effects of lockout time and error recovery cost. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50: 41-59. (doi:10.1006/ijhc.1998.0234)
43. Patsenko, E. G. and Altmann, E. M. 2010. How planful is routine behaviour? A selective-attention model of performance in the Tower of Hanoi. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(1): 95-116. (doi:10.1037/a0018268)
44. Peterson, L. R. and Peterson, M. J. 1959. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58: 193-198. (doi:10.1037/h0049234)
45. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P. and Mintz, F. E. 2003. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58: 583-603. (doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00023-5)
46. Trafton, J. G. and Monk, C. M. 2008. "Task interruptions". In Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, Edited by: Boehm-Davis, D. A. Vol. 3, 111-126. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
47. VanLehn, K. 1991. Rule acquisition events in the discovery of problem solving strategies. Cognitive Science, 15: 1-47. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1501_1)
48. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J. and Duggan, G. B. 2011. The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3): 485-503. (doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.507276)
49. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Morgan, P. L. and King, S. L. 2007. Influencing cognitive strategy by manipulating information access costs. The Computer Journal, 50(6): 694-702. (doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxm064)
50. Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 625-636. (doi:10.3758/BF03196322)