A Dynamic Context Model of Interactive Behavior

Cognitive Science

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 874-904

  Fu, Wai Tat ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Cognitive model; Dynamic context; Extended mind; Interactive cognition; Soft constraints

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 79960132252     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01173.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition (with commentary). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723-742.
3. Busemeyer, J., & Townsend, J. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432-459.
4. Carlson, R. A. (1997). Experienced cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Carlson, R. A., Avraamides, M. N., Cary, M., & Strasberg, S. (2007). What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 747-756.
6. Clark, A. (1989). Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
8. Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1985). Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science, 229(4716), 828-833.
9. Ekman, G. S. (1958). Two generalized ratio scaling methods. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 45(2), 287-295.
10. Fu, W.-T. (2007). Adaptive tradeoffs between exploration and exploitation: A rational-ecological approach. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems. (pp. 165-179). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Fu, W.-T., & Dong, W. (2010). From collaborative indexing to knowledge exploration: A social learning model. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 99.
12. Fu, W.-T., & Gray, W. D. (2000). Memory versus perceptual-motor tradeoffs in a blocks world task. Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 154-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Fu, W.-T., & Gray, W. (2006). Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking. Cognitive Psychology, 52(3), 195-242.
14. Fu, W.-T., Kannampalli, T. G., Kang, R., & He, J. (2010). Semantic imitation in social tagging. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17(3), Article 12
15. Fu, W.-T., & Pirolli, P. (2007). SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 355-412.
16. Gravetter, F., & Lockhead, G. R. (1973). Criterial range as a frame of reference for stimulus judgment. Psychological Review, 80(3), 203-216.
17. Gray, W., & Fu, W.-T. (2004). Soft constraints in interactive behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(3), 359-382.
18. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W. T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113(3), 461-482.
19. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice-Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(1), 31-44.
21. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98(3), 352-376.
22. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Lourenco, S. F., Crawford, L. E., & Corrigan, B. (2007). Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: Truncation due to boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 502-519.
23. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 220-241.
24. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513-549.
25. Nosofsky, R. (1992). Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition. In Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 363-393). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. O'Hara, K., & Payne, S. (1998). The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 34-70.
27. Parducci, A., & Perrett, L. F. (1971). Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency of option variables. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 89, 427-452.
28. Poulton, E. C. (1985). Geometric illusions in reading graphs. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 543-548.
29. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making [Article]. Psychological Review, 108(2), 370-392.
30. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 158-174.
31. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 281-295.
32. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
34. Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1989). Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 387-398.
35. Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18(1-3), 97-159.
36. Wedell, D. H. (1998). Testing models of trade-off contrast in pairwise choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24(1), 49-65.
37. Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Prentice Hall.
38. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.