Statistical vs. Stochastic experimental design: An experimental comparison on the example of protein refolding

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1499-1506

  Anselment, Bernd ^a   Schoemig, Veronika ^a   Kesten, Christopher ^a   Weuster Botz, Dirk ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Design of experiments; Lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus; Protein refolding

Indexed keywords

D-OPTIMAL; EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON; EXPERIMENTAL PROBLEMS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; PERFORMANCE TESTS; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS VARIABLES; PROTEIN REFOLDING; REFOLDING; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SCREENING EXPERIMENTS; SCREENING MODELS; SEARCH SPACES; STATISTICAL DESIGN; STOCHASTIC METHODS; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATIONS; SUBOPTIMAL SOLUTION; THERMOMYCES LANUGINOSUS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; STATISTICS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

OPTIMIZATION;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN REFOLDING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ASCOMYCOTA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FUNGAL PROTEINS; LIPASE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN REFOLDING; PROTEINS; RESEARCH DESIGN; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

THERMOMYCES LANUGINOSUS;

EID: 84872423317     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1635     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 7th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.
2. Lionberger RA, Lee SL, Lee L, Raw A, Yu LX. Quality by design: concepts for ANDAs. AAPS J. 2008; 10: 268-276.
3. Lasky FD, Boser RB. Designing in quality through design control: a manufacturer's perspective. Clin Chem. 1997; 43: 866-872.
4. Weuster-Botz D. Experimental design for fermentation media development: statistical design or global random search? J Biosci Bioeng. 2000; 90: 473-483.
5. Dejaegher B, Heyden YV. Experimental designs and their recent advances in set-up, data interpretation, and analytical applications. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011; 56: 141-158.
6. Bianchi L, Dorigo M, Gambardella LM, Gutjahr WJ. A survey on metaheuristics for stochastic combinatorial optimization. Nat Comput. 2008; 8: 239-287.
7. Coello Coello CA. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2006; 1: 28-36.
8. Gobin OC, Joaristi AM, Schüth F. Multi-objective optimization in combinatorial chemistry applied to the selective catalytic reduction of NO with C3H6. J Catal. 2007; 252: 205-214.
9. Gobin OC, Schüth F. On the suitability of different representations of solid catalysts for combinatorial library design by genetic algorithms. J Comb Chem. 2008; 10: 835-846.
10. Havel J, Link H, Hofinger M, Franco-Lara E, Weuster-Botz D. Comparison of genetic algorithms for experimental multi-objective optimization on the example of medium design for cyanobacteria. Biotechnol J. 2006; 1: 549-555.
11. Valax P, Georgiou G. Molecular characterization of beta-lactamase inclusion bodies produced in Escherichia coli. 1. Composition. Biotechnol Progr. 1993; 9: 539-547.
12. Choe W, Nian R, Lai W. Recent advances in biomolecular process intensification. Chem Eng Sci. 2006; 61: 886-906.
13. Jungbauer A, Kaar W. Current status of technical protein refolding. J Biotechnol. 2007; 128: 587-596.
14. Lilie H, Schwarz E, Rudolph R. Advances in refolding of proteins produced in E. coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1998; 9: 497-501.
15. Basu A, Li X, Leong SSJ. Refolding of proteins from inclusion bodies: rational design and recipes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 92: 241-251.
16. Middelberg APJ. Preparative protein refolding. Trends Biotechnol. 2002; 20: 437-443.
17. Clark ED. Protein refolding for industrial processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001; 12: 202-207.
18. Rudolph R, Lilie H. In vitro folding of inclusion body proteins. FASEB J. 1996; 10: 49-56.
19. Arakawa T, Ejima D, Tsumoto K, Obeyama N, Tanaka Y, Kita Y, Timasheffe SN. Suppression of protein interactions by arginine: a proposed mechanism of the arginine. Biophys Chem. 2007; 127: 1-8.
20. Hamada H, Arakawa T, Shiraki K. Effect of additives on protein aggregation. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2009; 10: 400-407.
21. Mayer M, Buchner J. Refolding of inclusion body proteins. Methods Mol Med. 2004; 94: 239-254.
22. Willis MS, Hogan JK, Prabhakar P, Liu X, Tsai K, Wei Y, Fox T. Investigation of protein refolding using a fractional factorial screen: a study of reagent effects and interactions. Protein Sci. 2005; 14: 1818-1826.
23. Vincentelli R, Canaan S, Campanacci V, Valencia C, Maurin D, Frassinetti F, Scappucini-Calvo L, Bourne Y, Cambillau C, Bignon C. High-throughput automated refolding screening of inclusion bodies. Protein Sci. 2004; 13: 2782-2792.
24. Mannall GJ, Myers JP, Liddell J, Titchener-Hooker NJ, Dalby PA. Ultra scale-down of protein refold screening in microwells: challenges, solutions and application. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009; 103: 329-340.
25. Scheich C, Niesen FH, Seckler R, Büssow K. An automated in vitro protein folding screen applied to a human dynactin subunit. Protein Sci. 2004; 13: 370-380.
26. Buckle AM, Devlin GL, Jodun RA, Fulton KF, Faux N, Whisstock JC, Bottomley SP. The matrix refolded. Nat Methods. 2005; 2: 3.
27. Amin AA, Bottomley SP, Chow MKM, Fulton KF, Whisstock JC, Buckle AM. REFOLD: an analytical database of protein refolding methods. Protein Expr Purif. 2006; 46: 166-171.
28. Anselment B, Baerend D, Mey E, Buchner J, Weuster-Botz D, Haslbeck M. Experimental optimization of protein refolding with a genetic algorithm. Protein Sci. 2010; 19: 2085-2095.
29. Jaeger KE, Reetz MT. Microbial lipases form versatile tools for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1998; 16: 396-403.
30. Brzozowskia M, Savage H, Verma CS, Turkenburg JP, Lawson DM, Svendsen A, Patkar S. Structural origins of the interfacial activation in Thermomyces (Humicola) lanuginosa lipase. Biochemistry 2000; 39: 15071-15082.
31. Danielsen S, Eklund M, Deussen HJ, Gräslund T, Nygren P A, Borchert TV. In vitro selection of enzymatically active lipase variants from phage libraries using a mechanism-based inhibitor. Gene. 2001; 272: 267-274.
32. Derewenda U, Swenson L, Wei Y, Green R, Kobos PM, Joerger R, Haas MJ, Derewenda ZS. Conformational lability of lipases observed in the absence of an oil-water interface: crystallographic studies of enzymes from the fungi Humicola lanuginosa and Rhizopus delemar. J Lipid Res. 1994; 35: 524-534.
33. Liu D, Schmid RD, Rusnak M. Functional expression of Candida antarctica lipase B in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm-a screening system for a frequently used biocatalyst. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 72: 1024-1032.
34. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE. 2002: 95-100.
35. Ahn JH, Lee YP, Rhee JS. Investigation of refolding condition for Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase by response surface methodology. J Biotechnol. 1997; 54: 151-160.
36. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J Roy Statistical Society, Series B. 1996; 58: 267-288.
37. Basu A, Chen WN, Leong SSJ. A rational design for hepatitis B virus X protein refolding and bioprocess development guided by second virial coefficient studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90: 181-191.