The epistemic impact of the etiology of experience

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 162, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 697-722

  Siegel, Susanna ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872360168     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-012-0059-5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
2. Browning, S. M., & Jones, S. (1988). Ichthyosis and delusions of lizard invasion. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavica, 78, 766-767.
3. Carey, S. (2009). The origins of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Chalmers, D. (2004). The representational character of experience. Reprinted in The components of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
5. Chalmers, D. (2012). Constructing the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Christensen, D. (1994). Conservatism in epistemology. Nous, 28(1), 68-89.
7. Deroy, O. (2012). Object-sensitivity without cognitive penetrability of perception In: Berit Brogaard.
8. Feldman, R., & Conee, E. (2001). Internalism defended. American Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 1-18.
9. Feldman, R. (2002). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
10. Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Fodor, J. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51, 23-43.
13. Foley, R. (1992). Working without a net: Essays in egocentric epistemology. New York: Oxford University press.
14. Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2003). Schizophrenia: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Gigerenzer, G. (2001). The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17. Goldman, A. (1988). Strong and weak justification. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 51-69.
18. Goldstone, R. (1995). Effects of categorization on color perception. Psychological Science, 5, 298-304.
19. Goldstone, R. (2013). Perceptual learning. In M. Matthen (Ed.), Oxford handbook for philosophy of perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Color scaling of discs and natural objects at different luminance levels. Visual Neuroscience, 23, 603-610.
21. Hansen, T., et al. (2006). Memory modulates color experience. Neuroscience, 9(11), 1367-1368.
22. Jackson, A. (2011). Appearances, rationality, and justified belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(3), 564-593.
23. Korcz, K. (1997). Recent work on the basing relation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(2), 171-192.
24. Korcz, K. A. (2010). The epistemic basing relation. In: Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edn.), http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/spr2010/entries/basing-epistemic.
25. Kriegel, U. (2009). Subjective consciousness: A self-representational theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Kvanvig, Jonathan. (2003). Propositionalism and the perspectival character of justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40(1), 3-18.
27. Levin, D. T., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 501-512.
28. Lycan, W. (1988). Judgment and justification (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy). New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lyons, J. (2012). Circularity, reliability, and cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophical Issues, 21(1), 289-311.
30. Macpherson, F. (2012). Cognitive penetration of color experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 84(1), 24-62.
31. Mandelbaum, E. (2010). The architecture of belief. UNC-Chapel Hill: PhD Dissertation.
32. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33. McDowell, J. (2008). The disjunctive conception of experience as material for a transcendental argument. In F. Macpherson & A. Haddock (Eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, action, knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Mellor, C. S. (1970). First rank symptoms of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 117, 15-23.
35. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 181-192.
36. Peacocke, C. (2004). The realm of reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Pinto-Correira, C. (1997). The ovary of eve. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Pollak, S., & Sinha, P. (2002). Enhanced perceptual sensitivity for anger among physically abused children. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 784-791.
40. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? the case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-365.
41. Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Setiya, K. (2008). Practical knowledge. Ethics, 118(3), 388-409.
43. Siegel, S. (2006a). Which properties are represented in perception? In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Siegel, S. (2006b). Subject and object in the contents of visual experience. Philosophical Review, 115, 3.
45. Siegel, S. (2010). The contents of visual experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Siegel, S. (2011). Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Nous, 46(2), 201-222.
47. Siegel, S. (2013). Can selection effects influence the rational role of experience? In: T. Gendler (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Siegel, S. & Silins, N. (2013). The epistemology of perception. In: Mohan Matthen (Ed.), To appear in Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Siewert, C. (1998). The significance of consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50. Silins, N. (2011). Seeing through the veil of perception. Mind, 120, 329-367.
51. Silins, N. & Siegel, S. (2013). Consciousness, attention, and justification. To appear In: D. Dodd and E. Zardini (Eds.), New essays on skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Sosa, E. (2007). Reflective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Turri, J. (2010). On the relationship between propositional and doxastic justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80(2), 312-326.
54. Wegner, D. M., Coulton, G., & Wenzloff, R. (1985). The transparency of denial: Briefing in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 338-346.