The net generation illusion: Challenging conformance to social expectations

Teaching, Learning and the Net Generation: Concepts and Tools for Reaching Digital Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 324-339

  Ellaway, Rachel ^a   Tworek, Janet ^b  

^a NORTHERN ONTARIO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872123208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-347-8.ch018     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. American Medical Association. (2010). Medical student debt. Retrieved December 31, 2010, from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/member-groups-sections/medicalstudent-section/advocacy-policy/medical-student-debt.shtml.
2. Amin, Z., Boulet, J., Cook, D., Ellaway, R., Fahal, A., Kneebone, R., & Ziv, A. (2011). (in press). Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education. Medical Teacher. doi:10.3109/0 142159X.2011.565832
3. Barron, B. (2004). Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1-36. doi:10.2190/1N20-VV12-4RB5-33VA
4. Beck, C., & Wade, M. (2004). Got game: How the gamer generation is shaping business forever. Harvard Business School Publishing.
5. Beetham, H., McGill, L., et al. (2009). Thriving in the 21st century: Learning literacies for the digital age. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow Caledonian University/JISC. Retrieved June 5, 2010, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/llidareportjune2009.pdf.
6. Bonilla-Warford, N. (2011). Should you take the plunge into social media? Optometry -.Journal of the American Optometric Association, 82(1), 51-52. doi:10.1016/j.optm.2010.11.004
7. Brailer, D. (2005). Interoperability: The key to the future health care system. Health Affairs, (w5.19-w5.20).
8. Caison, A. L., Bulman, D., Pai, S., & Neville, D. (2008). Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian university. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(3), 283-294. doi:10.1080/13561820802061809
9. Chretien, K., Greysen, S., Chretien, J.-P., & Kind, T. (2009). Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(12). doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387
10. Christensen, C. (2003). The innovator's dilemma. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
11. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Cook, D. (2009). The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Medical Teacher, 31(2), 158-162. doi:10.1080/01421590802691393
13. Costello, C. (2005). Professional identity crisis: Race, class, gender, and success at professional schools. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
14. Davies, W. (2006). Digital exuberance. Prospect, 119, 30-33.
15. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
16. Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause, 28(1). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/PlanningforNeomillennialLearni/157325.
17. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Neckerman, K. (Ed.), Social inequality. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Dutton, W., & Loader, B. (Eds.). (2002). Digital academe: The new media and institutions of higher education and learning. London, UK: Routledge.
19. Ellaway, R. (2010a). eMedical Teacher # 33: Cyborg medical education. Medical Teacher, 32(3), 273-275. doi:10.3109/01421591003704360
20. Ellaway, R. (2010b). Developing learning resources. In Dornan, T., Mann, K., Scherpbier, A., & Spencer, J. (Eds.), Medical education: Theory and practice (pp. 265-282). Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier.
21. Ellaway, R. (2010c). eMedical Teacher # 38: Digital Professionalism. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 705-707. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.505849
22. Farnan, J., Paro, J., Higa, J., Reddy, S., Humphrey, H., & Arora, V. (2009). The relationship status of digital media and professionalism: It's complicated. Academic Medicine, 84, 1479-1481. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb17af
23. Farnan, J. M., Gersh, S., Reddy, S. T., & Moyer, D. (2010). A brave new world: Professionalism in the Digital Age. Academic Internal Medicine Insight, 8(2), 4-5,17.
24. Graham, G. (1999). The Internet: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge.
25. Grant, L. (2007). Learning to be part of the knowledge economy: Digital divides and media literacy (No. 816). England: FutureLab. Retrieved from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/discussion-papers/Discussion-Paper816.
26. Haas, J., & Shaffir, W. (1991). Becoming doctors: The adoption of a cloak of competence. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
27. Hafferty, F. (1998). Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Academic Medicine, 73(4), 403-407. doi:10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013
28. Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults' use of the internet. Communication Research, 35, 602-621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782
29. Hobbs, S. D. (2002). Measuring nurses' computer competency: An analysis of published instruments. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 20(2), 63-73. doi:10.1097/00024665-200203000-00012
30. Hoffman, J. (2010, December 5). As bullies go digital, parents play catch-up. New York Times, pp. A1, A26-27. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/05/us/05bully.html?ref=us.
31. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millenials rising: The next great generation. New York, NY: Random House.
32. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., & Herr, B. (Eds.). (2009). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
33. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur. London, UK: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
34. Kent, N., & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 440-455. Retrieved from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/external-publications/External-Publication630. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00102.x
35. Kind, T., Genrich, G., Sodhi, A., & Chretien, K. C. (2010). Social media policies at US medical schools. Medical Education Online, 15.
36. Krause, N., Roulette, G., Papp, K., & Kaelber, D. (2006). Assessing medical informatics confidence among 1st and 2nd year medical students. AMIA. Annu. Symp. Proc. 2006, (p. 989).
37. La Rue, F. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom and expression. Human Rights Council. United Nations.
38. MacDonald, J., Sohn, S., & Ellis, P. (2010). Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: A dilemma for young doctors. Medical Education, 44(8), 805-813. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03720.x
39. McDonough, B., & Johnson, J. (2010). Inspiring education: A dialogue with Albertans. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Education.
40. Meng, J., Elliott, K., & Hall, M. (2010). Technology readiness index (TRI): Assessing cross-cultural validity. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 19-31. doi:10.1080/08961530902844915
41. Mondoux, S. (2010). CFMS guide to medical professionalism. Canadian Foundation of Medical Students.
42. Nguyen, D., Zierler, B., & Nguyen, H. (2011). A survey of nursing faculty needs for training in use of new technologies for education and practice. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(4), 181-188. doi:10.3928/01484834-20101130-06
43. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Retrieved from net. educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf.
44. Palen, L., & Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. Paper presented at the CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
45. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (tri): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J Service Rsch, 2(4), 307-320. doi:10.1177/109467050024001
46. Prensky, M. (2001). Digitalnatives, digital immigrants. Horizon, 9(5). doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
47. Qualman, E. (2011). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. John Wiley and Sons.
48. Reiser, S. (2009). Technological medicine: The changing world of doctors and patients. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49. Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2005). Gen M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
50. Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
51. Rideout, V., Foehr, U., Roberts, D., & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media at the new millenium. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
52. Rothman, D., & Blumenthal, D. (Eds.). (2010). Medical professionalism in the new information age. Rutgers University Press.
53. Slade, D. (2010). Students win Facebook battle with U of C: Judge rules in favour of twins over defamation. Calgary Herald. Retrieved from http://www.calgaryherald.com/technology/Students+Facebook+battle+with/3670183/story.html.
54. Slater, C., Crichton, S., & Pegler, K. (2010). Understanding teaching technology use by generation, knowledge and career cycle (p. 39). Calgary Board of Education.
55. Snyder, B. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Statistics Canada. (2010, May 10). Canadian internet use survey. The Daily. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/100510/dq100510a-eng.htm.
57. Tapscott, D. (1997). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
58. Thompson, L., Dawson, K., Ferdig, R., Black, E., Boyer, J., Coutts, J., & Black, N. (2008). The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(7), 954-957. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8
59. Tworek, J. (2007). High school students' uses of media. Calgary: M.Sc., University of Calgary.
60. United States Census Bureau. Population Division, Education & Social Stratification Branch. (2010). Appendix table A: Households with a computer and internet use: 1984 to 2009. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61. United States Department of Commerce. (2010). Exploring the digital nation: Home broadband internet adoption in the United States. National Telecommunications and Information Association.
62. Warschauer, M. (2000). Technology and school reform: A view from both sides of the track. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(4), 1-21.