Species traits and the response of open-habitat species to forest edge in landscape mosaics

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 42-51

  Fonderflick, Jocelyn ^a   Besnard, Aurélien ^a   Martin, Jean Louis ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST EDGE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT TYPE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NEST PREDATION; PASSERINE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE;

ALAUDA ARVENSIS; AVES; LULLULA ARBOREA;

EID: 84872094729     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20308.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bieringer G. and Zulka K. P. 2003. Shading out species richness: edge effect of a pine plantation on the Orthoptera (Tettigoniidae and Acrididae) assemblage of an adjacent dry grassland. - Biodivers. Conserv. 12: 1481-1495.
2. BirdLife International 2004. Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife Conservation Series no. 12. - BirdLife International.
3. Brennan L. A. and Kuvlesky Jr W. P. 2005. North American grassland birds: an unfolding conservation crisis? - J. Wildlife Manage. 69: 1-13.
4. Brotons L. et al. 2005. Effect of adjacent agricultural habitat on the distribution of passerines in natural grasslands. - Biol. Conserv. 124: 407-414.
5. Burke D. M. and Nol E. 1998. Influence of food abundance, nest-site habitat and forest fragmentation on breeding ovenbirds. - Auk 115: 96-104.
6. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer.
7. Burton N. H. 2007. Influences of restock age and habitat patchiness on tree pipits Anthus trivialis breeding in Breckland pine plantations. - Ibis 149: 193-204.
8. Cadenasso M. L. et al. 1997. Functional location of forest edges: gradients of multiple physical factors. - Can. J. For. Res. 27: 774-782.
9. Cadenasso M. L. 2003. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. - BioScience 53: 750-758.
10. Caplat P. and Fonderflick J. 2009. Area mediated shifts in bird community composition: a study on a fragmented Mediterranean grassland. - Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 2979-2995.
11. Caplat P. 2006. Landscape patterns and agriculture: modelling the long-term effects of human practices on Pinus sylvestris spatial dynamics (Causse Mejean, France). - Landscape Ecol. 21: 657-670.
12. Collinge S. K. 2009. Ecology of fragmented landscapes. - The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
13. Cramp S. (eds) 1977-1994. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and Nord Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic. - Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Creegan H. P. and Osborne P. E. 2005. Gap-crossing decisions of woodland songbirds in Scotland: an experimental approach. - J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 678-687.
15. Dunning J. B. et al. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. - Oikos 65: 169-175.
16. Ewers R. M. and Didham R. K. 2006. Continuous response functions for quantifying the strength of edge effects. - J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 527-536.
17. Fagan W. F. et al. 1999. How habitat edges change species inter actions. - Am. Nat. 153: 165-182.
18. Fletcher Jr R. J. and Koford R. R. 2003. Spatial responses of bobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) near different types of edges in northern Iowa. - Auk 120: 799-810.
19. Fonderflick J. 2006. Analyse écologique et enjeux patrimoniaux de l'avifaune nicheuse des grands causses de lozère (France). - Alauda 74: 235-250.
20. Fonderflick J. et al. 2010. Avifauna trends following changes in a Mediterranean upland pastoral system. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137: 337-347.
21. Forman R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
22. Heil G. W. et al. 2007. Environmental effects of afforestation in northwestern Europe: from field observations to decision support. - Springer.
23. Kristan W. B. et al. 2003. Alternative causes of edge-abundance relationships in birds and small mammals of California coastal sage scrub. - Ecography 26: 29-44.
24. Lahti D. C. 1999. The 'edge effect on nest predation' hypothesis after twenty years. - Biol. Conserv. 99: 365-374.
25. Lima S. L. and Dill L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
26. McCollin D. 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: a functional approach. - Ecography 21: 247-260.
27. Murcia C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 58-62.
28. Pithon J. A. et al. 2005. The influence of coniferous afforestation on lowland farmland bird communities in Ireland: different seasons and landscape contexts. - Landscape Urban Planning 71: 91-103.
29. Prodon R. and Lebreton J.-D. 1981. Breeding avifauna of a Mediterranean succession: the holm oak and the cork oak series in the eastern Pyrenees. 1. Analysis and modelling of the structure gradient. - Oikos 37: 21-38.
30. Reino L. et al. 2009. Distance to edges, edge contrast and landscape fragmentation: interactions affecting farmland birds around forest plantations. - Biol. Conserv. 142: 824-838.
31. Reino L. et al. 2010. Does afforestation increase bird nest predation risk in surrounding farmland? - For. Ecol. Manage. 260: 1359-1366.
32. Renfrew R. B. et al. 2005. Edge avoidance by nesting grassland birds: a futile strategy in a fragmented landscape. - Auk 122: 618-636.
33. Ries L. and Sisk T. D. 2004. A predictive model of edge effects. - Ecology 85: 2917-2926.
34. Ries L. et al. 2004. Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 491-522.
35. Schaefer T. and Vogel B. 2000. Why do woodlarks need field-forest ecotones? An analysis of possible factors. - J. Ornithol. 141: 335-344.
36. Schlossberg S. and King D. I. 2008. Are shrubland birds edge specialists? - Ecol. Appl. 18: 1330-1350.
37. Sirami C. et al. 2008. Is land abandonment having an impact on biodiversity? A meta-analytical approach to bird distribution changes in the northwestern Mediterranean. - Biol. Conserv. 141: 450-459.
38. Sirami C. et al. 2011. Woodlarks Lullula arborea and landscape heterogeneity created by land abandonment. - Bird Study 58: 99-106.
39. Sisk T. D. et al. 1997. Bird assemblages in patchy woodlands: modeling the effects of edge and matrix habitats. - Ecol. Appl. 7: 1170-1180.
40. Söderström B. et al. 1998. Different nest predator faunas and nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests at forest ecotones: an experiment and a review. - Oecologia 117: 108-118.
41. Stephens S. E. et al. 2004. Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. - Biol. Conserv. 115: 101-110.
42. Strayer D. L. et al. 2003. A classification of ecological boundaries. - BioScience 53: 723-729.
43. Suarez-Seoane S. et al. 2002. Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitat requirements to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain. - Biol. Conserv. 105: 333-344.
44. Tourenq C. et al. 2001. Identifying rice fields at risk from damage by the greater flamingo. - J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 170-179.
45. Tucker G. M. and Evans M. 1997. Habitats for birds in Europe: a conservation strategy for the wider environment. BirdLife Conservation Series, no. 6. - BirdLife International.
46. Villard M. A. 1998. On forest-interior species, edge avoidance, area sensitivity and dogmas in avian conservation. - Auk 115: 801-805.
47. Williams-Linera G. 1990. Vegetation structure and environ mental conditions of forest edges in Panama. - J. Ecol. 78: 356-373.
48. Zanette L. et al. 2000. Food shortage in small fragments: evidence from an area-sensitive passerine. - Ecology 81: 1654-1666.