Property rights and invention

Handbook of the Economics of Innovation

Volumn 1, Issue 1 C, 2010, Pages 315-380

  Rockett, Katharine ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^c CEPR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Incentives; Innovation; Intellectual property rights; Patents; Procurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872071071     PISSN: 22108807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01007-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (179)

1. Acharya, V., Subramanian, K. (2007). "Bankruptcy codes and innovation". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 6307.
2. Aghion, P., Tirole, J. (1994). "The management of innovation". Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4), 1185-1209.
3. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. (2005). "Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship". Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2), 701-728.
4. Allison, J., Lemley, M. (1998). "Empirical analysis of the validity of litigated patents". American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal 26 (3), 185-275.
5. Anand, B., Khanna, T. (2000). "The structure of licensing contracts". Journal of Industrial Economics 48 (1), 103-135.
6. Anderson, R., Gallini, N. (Eds.), (1998). Competition policy and intellectual property rights in the knowledge-based economy. University of Calgary Press, Calgary.
7. Anton, J., Yao, D. (1994). "Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights". American Economic Review 84 (1), 190-209.
8. Anton, J., Yao, D. (2002). "The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights and contracting". Review of Economics Studies 69 (3), 513-531.
9. Anton, J., Yao, D. (2004). "Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property". RAND Journal of Economics 35 (1), 1-122.
10. Aoki, R., Spiegel, Y. (1998). "Public disclosure of patent applications, R&D and welfare". Foerder Institute Working Paper 30-98.
11. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., Cohen, W. (2003). "R&D and the patent premium". National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9431.
13. Arrow, K. (1962). "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention". In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, pp. 609-626.
14. Ayres, I., Klemperer, P. (1999). "Limiting patentees' market power without reducing innovation incentives: The perverse benefits of uncertainty and non-injunctive remedies". Michigan Law Review 97 (2), 985-1033.
15. Baker, S., Mezzetti, C. (2005). "Disclosure as a strategy in the patent race". Journal of Law and Economics 48 (1), 173-194.
16. Bar, T. (2006). "Defensive publications in an R&D race". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 15 (1), 229-254.
17. Belenzon, S. (2006). "Knowledge flow and sequential innovation: Implications for technology diffusion R&D and market value". Oxford University Working Paper 259.
18. Bessen, J. (2006). "The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics". Boston University School of Law Working Paper 06-46.
19. Bessen, J., Maskin, E. (2009). "Sequential innovation, patents and imitation". RAND Journal of Economics 40 (4), 611-635.
20. Bessen, J., Meurer, M. (2008a). "The private costs of patent litigation". Boston University School of Law Working Paper 07-08.
21. Bessen, J., Meurer, M. (2008b). "The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics". Research Policy 37 (5), 932-945.
22. Bidgoli, H. (2010). The Handbook of Technology Management, vol. 3. Management Support Systems, Electronic Commerce, Legal and Security Considerations. Wiley, New York.
23. Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., Van Reenen, J. (2007). "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry". National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13060 (April).
24. Boldrin, M., Levine, D. (2003). "Rent-seeking and innovation". Journal of Monetary Economics 51 (1), 127-160.
25. Boncinelli, L. (2008). "Global vs. local information in (anti-)coordination problems with imitators". The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8 (1), (Article 17).
26. Boyce, J., Hollis, A. (2007). "Preliminary injunctions and damage rules in patent law". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16 (2), 385-405.
27. Brunt, L., Lerner, J., Nicholas, T. (2008). "Inducement prizes and innovation". Centre for Economic Policy research Discussion Paper 6917.
28. Calabresi, G., Melamed, D. (1972). "Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: One view of the cathedral". Harvard Law Review 85 (6), 1089-1128.
29. Carlton, D., Gertner, R. (2003). "Intellectual property, antitrust, and strategic behavior". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 29-59.
30. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R. (2002). "R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium". American Economic Review 92 (4), 1169-1184.
31. Chen, M., Iyigun, M. (2006). "Patent protection and strategic delays in technology development: Implications for economic growth". University of Colorado Working Paper 04-09 (Revised 2007).
32. Choi, J. (2002). "A dynamic analysis of licensing: The 'boomerang' effect and grant-back clauses". International Economic Review 43 (3), 803-829.
33. Choi, J. (2003). "Patent pools and cross-licensing in the shadow of patent litigation". CESifo Working Paper 1070.
34. Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. (1989). "Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D". The Economic Journal 99 (397), 569-596.
35. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., Walsh, J. (2000). "Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)". National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7552.
36. Comino, S., Manenti, F., Nicolo, A. (2007). "Sequential innovations with unobservable follow-on investments". Universita Degli Studi Di Padova "Marco Fanno" Working Paper 41.
37. Cornelli, F., Schankerman, M. (1999). "Patent renewals and R&D incentives". RAND Journal of Economics 30 (2), 197-213.
38. Crampes, C., Langinier, C. (2002). "Litigation and settlement in patent infringement cases". RAND Journal of Economics 33 (4), 258-274.
39. Denicolo, V. (1996). "Patent races and optimal patent breadth and length". The Journal of Industrial Economics 44 (3), 249-265.
40. Denicolo, V. (2000). "Two-stage patent races and patent policy". RAND Journal of Economics 31 (3), 488-501.
41. Denicolo, V., Franzoni, L. (2004). "The contract theory of patents". International Review of Law and Economics 23 (4), 365-380.
42. Dewatripont, M., Legros, P. (2008). "'Essential' patents, FRAND royalties and technological standards". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 6925.
43. Ebert, L. (2004). "How high are the grant rates at the USPTO?" Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 86 (7), 568-576.
44. Eisenberg, R. (1989). "Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use". The University of Chicago Law Review 56, 1017-1086.
45. Encoua, D., Lefouili, Y. (2008). Licensing Uncertain Patents: Per-Unit Royalty vs. Up-Front Fee. Paris School of Economics, University of Paris-I Pantheon Sorbonne, Paris.
46. Eswaran, M. (1994). "Cross-licensing of competing patents and a facilitating device". Canadian Journal of Economics 28 (3), 698-708.
47. Evans, D., Schmalensee, R. (2002). "Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competitive industries". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-49.
48. Farrell, J. (1995). "Some arguments for weaker intellectual property protection in network industries". StandardView 3 (2), 46-49.
49. Farrell, J., Katz, M. (1998). "The effects of antitrust and intellectual property law on compatibility and innovation". Antitrust Law Bulletin 43 (3), 609-650.
50. Farrell, J., Katz, M. (2000). "Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in system markets". Journal of Industrial Economics 48 (4), 413-432.
51. Farrell, J., Shapiro, C. (2007). "How strong are weak patents?" Competition Policy Center Paper CPC05-54.
52. Farrell, J., Hayes, J., Shapiro, C., Sullivan, T. (2007). Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up. University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.
53. Fershtman, C., Kamien, M. (1992). "Cross-licensing of complementary technologies". International Journal of Industrial Organization 10 (3), 329-348.
54. Galasso, A., Schankerman, M. (2008). "Patent thickets and the market for innovation: Evidence from settlement of patent disputes". Centre for Economics Policy Research Discussion Paper 6946.
55. Gallini, N. (1984). "Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing". American Economic Review 74 (5), 931-941.
56. Gallini, N. (1992). "Patent policy and costly imitation". RAND Journal of Economics 23 (1), 52-63.
57. Gallini, N. (2002). "The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform". Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (2), 131-154.
58. Gallini, N., Scotchmer, S. (2002). "Intellectual property: When is it the best incentive system?" In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 51-77.
59. Geradin, D., Layne-Farrar, A., Padilla, A.J. (2007). "The ex ante auction model for the control of market power in standard setting organisations". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 6304.
60. Gilbert, R. (1995). The 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property: New Signposts for the Intersection of Intellectual Property and the Antitrust Law. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
61. Gilbert, R., Katz, M. (2006). "Should good patents come in small packages? A welfare analysis of intellectual property bundling". International Journal of Industrial Organization 24 (5), 931-952.
62. Gilbert, R., Katz, M. (2007). "Efficient division of profits from complementary innovations". Competition Policy Center Paper CPC07-076.
63. Gilbert, R., Newbery, D. (1982). "Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly". American Economic Review 72 (3), 514-526.
64. Gilbert, R., Shapiro, C. (1990). "Optimal patent length and breadth". RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1), 106-112.
65. Gilbert, R., Shapiro, C. (1997). "Antitrust issues in the licensing of intellectual property: The nine no-no's meet the nineties". In: Winston, M.N., Baily, M.N., Reiss, P.C. (Eds.), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics 1997. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 283-349.
66. Gilbert, R., Sunshine, S. (1995). "Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis: The use of innovation markets". Antitrust Law Journal 63, 569-602.
67. Gill, D. (2008). "Strategic disclosure of intermediate research results". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 17 (3), 733-758.
68. Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, K., Hoisl, K., Lebas, C., et al. (2006). "Everything you always wanted to know about inventor (but never asked): evidence from the PATVAL-EU survey". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 5752.
69. Glachant, M., Meniere, Y. (2008). Technology Diffusion with Learning Spillovers: Patent versus Free Access. Ecole des Mines, Paris.
70. Graham, S., Harhoff, D. (2006). "Can post-grant reviews improve patent system design? A twin study of US and European patents". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 5680 (May).
71. Green, J., Scotchmer, S. (1995). "On the division of profit in sequential innovation". RAND Journal of Economics 26 (1), 20-33.
72. Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M. (2007a). Trade Marks and Performance in UK Firms: Evidence of Schumpeterian Competition through Innovation. Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, Oxford University, Oxford.
73. Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M. (2007b). The Value of Intellectual Property Rights to Firms. Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, Oxford University, Oxford.
74. Guellec, D., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2007). The Economics of the European Patent System: IP Policy for Competition and Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
75. Hall, B. (2002). "The financing of research and development". Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 (1), 35-51.
76. Hall, B. (2007). "Patents and patent policy". Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23 (4), 541-567.
77. Hall, B., Lerner, J. (2010). "Financing R&D and innovation". In: Hall, B., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), Elsevier Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
78. Hall, B., Ziedonis, R. (2001a). "The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 101-128.
79. Hall, B., Ziedonis, R. (2001b). "The effects of strengthening patent rights on firms engaged in cumulative innovation: Insights from the semiconductor industry". In: Libecap, G. (Ed.), Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes: New Studies of Entrepreneurship in the United States, vol. 13. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
80. Hall, B., Graham, S., Harhoff, D., Mowery, D. (2003). "Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via postgrant opposition". In: Jaffe, J., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 4. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 115-143.
81. Harhoff, D., Reitzig, M. (2004). "Determinants of oppositions against EPO patent grants: The case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals". International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (4), 443-480.
82. Harhoff, D., Wagner, S. (2005). "Modelling the duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 5283.
83. Harhoff, D., Wagner, S. (2006). Business method patents in europe and their strategic use-Evidence from franking device manufacturers. Discussion Paper in Business Administration 1265 Munich School of Management, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
84. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., von Hippel, E. (2003). "Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations". Research Policy 32 (10), 1753-1769.
85. Hedge, D., Mowery, D., Graham, S. (2007). "Pioneers, submariners, or thicket-builders: Which firms use continuations in patenting?" NBER Working Paper 13153 (June).
86. Heller, M., Eisenberg, R. (1998). "Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research". Science 280 (5364), 698-701.
87. Henkel, J. (2004). "The jukebox mode of innovation-A model of commercial open source development". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper DP4507 (July).
88. Hopenhayn, H., Mitchell, M. (2001). "Innovation variety and patent breadth". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 152-166.
89. Hopenhayn, H., Llobet, G., Mitchell, M. (2006). "Rewarding sequential innovators: Prizes, patents, and buyouts". Journal of Political Economy 114 (6), 1041-1068.
90. Horowitz, A., Lai, E. (1996). "Patent length and the rate of innovation". International Economic Review 37 (4), 785-801.
91. Horstmann, I., MacDonald, G., Slivinski, A. (1985). "Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent". The Journal of Political Economy 93 (5), 837-858.
92. Hunt, R. (2004). "Patentability, industry structure, and innovation". Journal of Industrial Economics 52 (3), 401-426.
93. Hylton, K. (2006). "Property rules and liability rules, once again". Review of Law and Economics 2 (2), 137-191.
94. Jaffe, A. (2000). "The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process". Research Policy 29, 531-557.
95. Jaffe, A., Lerner, J. (2006). Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
96. Janis, M. (2003). Experimental Use and the Shape of Patent Rights for Plant Innovation. University of Iowa School of Law, Iowa.
97. Kaplow, L. (1984). "The patent-antitrust intersection: A reappraisal". Harvard Law Review 97 (8), 1813-1892.
98. Katz, M., Shapiro, C. (1986). "Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities". Journal of Political Economy 94 (4), 822-841.
99. Katz, M., Shapiro, C. (1987). "R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation". American Economic Review 77 (3), 402-420.
100. Katz, M., Shelanski, H. (2006). "Merger policy and innovation: Must enforcement change to account for technological change?" In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 109-165.
101. Katz, M., Shelanski, H. (2007). "Mergers and innovation". Antitrust Law Journal 74, 1-86.
102. Kim, J., Marschke, G. (2005). "Labour mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision". RAND Journal of Economics 36 (2), 298-317.
103. Kitch, E. (1977). "The nature and function of the patent system". Journal of Law and Economics 20 (2), 265-290.
104. Klemperer, P. (1990). "How broad should the scope of patent protection be?" RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1), 113-130.
105. Kremer, M. (1998). "Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation". Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (4), 1137-1167.
106. La Manna, M. (1994). "Research vs. development: Optimal patenting policy in a three-stage model". European Economic Review 38 (7), 1423-1440.
107. Lakhani, K., Wolf, R. (2005). "Why hackers do what they do? Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects". In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S., Lakhani, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
108. Langinier, C. (2005). "Using patents to mislead rivals". Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (2), 520-545.
109. Lanjouw, J., Lerner, J. (2001). "Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions". Journal of Law and Economics 44 (2), 573-603.
110. Lanjouw, J., Schankerman, M. (2001). "Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 129-151.
111. Lanjouw, J., Schankerman, M. (2004). "Protecting intellectual property rights: Are small firms handicapped?" Journal of Law and Economics 47 (1), 45-74.
112. Layne-Farrar, A., Lerner, J. (2008). To Join or Not to Join: Examining Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing Rules. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
113. Lemley, M. (2001). "Rational ignorance at the patent office". Northwestern University Law Review 95 (4), 1497-1532.
114. Lemley, M., Shapiro, C. (2005). "Probabilistic patents". Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2), 75-98.
115. Lemley, M., Shapiro, C. (2007). "Patent holdup and royalty stacking". Texas Law Review 85, 1990-2049.
116. Lerner, J. (1995). "Patenting in the shadow of competitors". Journal of Law and Economics 38 (2), 463-495.
117. Lerner, J. (2005). "150 Years of patent office practice". American Law and Economics Review 7, 112-143.
118. Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2002). "Some simple economics of open source". Journal of Industrial Economics 50 (2), 197-234.
119. Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2004). "Efficient patent pools". American Economic Review 94 (3), 691-711.
120. Lerner, J., Tirole, J. (2005). "The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond". The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2), 99-120.
121. Lichtman, D. (2006). Patent Holdouts in the Standard-Setting Process. Academic Advisory Council Bulletin 1.3. Progress and Freedom Foundation, Washington, DC.
122. Manelli, A., Regibeau, P., Rockett, K. (1994). "Trademark protection and post-patent competition". Cuadernos Economicos de ICE 57 (2), 115-139.
123. Matutes, C., Regibeau, P., Rockett, K. (1996). "Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations". RAND Journal of Economics 27 (1), 60-83.
124. Maurer, S., Scotchmer, S. (2002). "The independent invention defence in intellectual property". Economica 69 (276), 535-547.
125. Maurer, S., Scotchmer, S. (2004). "Procuring knowledge". In: Libecap, G. (Ed.), Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship, vol. 15: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-31.
126. Maurer, S., Scotchmer, S. (2006a). "Profit neutrality in licensing: The boundary between antitrust law and patent law". American Law and Economics Review 8, 476-522.
127. Maurer, S., Scotchmer, S. (2006b). "Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm". In: Hendershott, T. (Ed.), Handbook on Economics and Information Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam Chapter 5.
128. Menell, P., Scotchmer, S. (2007). "Intellectual property". In: Polinsky, M., Shavell, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
129. Merges, R. (1999). Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools. School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.
130. Merges, R.P., Nelson, R.R. (1990). "On the complex economics of patent scope". Columbia Law Review 90, 839-916.
131. Merges, R., Menell, P., Lemley, M. (2006). Intellectual property in the new technological age (4). Aspen, New York.
132. Middendorf, W. (1981). What Every Engineer Needs to Know About Inventing, vol. 7. What Every Engineer Should Know. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
133. Miller, A., Davis, M.H. (1983). Intellectual Property: Patents, Trademarks and Copyright in a Nutshell. West Publishing, St. Paul, MN.
134. Miyagiwa, K. (2007). "Collusion and research joint ventures". The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, Discussion Paper 704.
135. Moser, P. (2005). "Do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world's fairs". American Economic Review 95 (4), 1214-1236.
136. Nard, C., Morriss, A. (2006). "Constitutionalizing patents: From Venice to Philadelphia". Review of Law and Economics 2 (2), 223-321.
137. Noel, M., Schankerman, M. (2006). "Strategic patenting and software innovation". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 5701.
138. Nordhaus, W. (1969). Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
139. O'Donoghue, T. (1998). "A patentability requirement for sequential innovation". RAND Journal of Economics 29 (4), 654-679.
140. O'Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S., Thisse, J.-F. (1998). "Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress". Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7 (1), 1-32.
141. Pakes, A. (1986). "Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks". Econometrica 54 (4), 755-784.
142. Qian, Y. (2007). "Do additional national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A crosscountry analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978-2002". Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (3), 436-453.
143. Regibeau, P., Rockett, K. (2007). "The relationship between intellectual property law and competition law: An economic approach". In: Anderman, S. (Ed.), The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
144. Sakakibara, M., Branstetter, L. (2001). "Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 77-100.
145. Schankerman, M., Scotchmer, S. (2001). "Damages and injunctions in the protection of intellectual property". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1), 199-220.
146. Schmidt, K. (2008). "Complementary patents and market structure". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 7005.
147. Scotchmer, S. (1991). "Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law". The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1), 29-41.
148. Scotchmer, S. (1996). "Protecting early innovators: Should second-generation products be patentable?" RAND Journal of Economics 27 (2), 322-331.
149. Scotchmer, S. (1998). "R&D joint ventures and other cooperative arrangements". In: Anderson, R., Gallini, N. (Eds.), Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. University of Calgary Press, Calgary.
150. Scotchmer, S. (1999). "On the optimality of the patent renewal system". RAND Journal of Economics 30 (2), 181-196.
151. Scotchmer, S. (2004). Innovation and incentives. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
152. Scotchmer, S., Green, J. (1990). "Novelty and disclosure in patent law". RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1), 131-146.
153. Segal, I., Whinston, M. (2007). "Antitrust in innovative industries". American Economic Review 97 (5), 1703-1730.
154. Sena, V. (2004). "The return of the Prince of Denmark: A survey on recent developments in the economics of innovation". The Economic Journal 114, F312-F332.
155. Severinov, S. (2001). "On information sharing and incentives in R&D". RAND Journal of Economics 32 (3), 542-564.
156. Shapiro, C. (2001). "Navigating the patent thicket: cross-licenses, patent pools and standard-setting". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, S., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 119-150.
157. Shapiro, C. (2003). "Antitrust limits to patent settlements". RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2), 391-411.
158. Shapiro, C. (2004). "Patent system reform: Economic analysis and critique". Berkeley Technology Law Journal 19 (3), 1017-1047.
159. Shapiro, C. (2008). "Patent reform: Aligning reward and contribution". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation and the Economy, vol. 8. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111-156.
160. Shavell, S., Ypersele, T. (2001). "Rewards versus intellectual property rights". Journal of Law and Economics 44, 525-547.
161. Siebert, R., von Graevenitz, G. (2005). "How licensing resolves hold-up: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model with unobserved heterogeneity". CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5436.
162. Sorenson, O., Fleming, L. (2004). "Science and the diffusion of knowledge". Research Policy 33 (10), 1615-1634.
163. Swanson, D., Baumol, W. (2005). "Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection, and control of market power". Antitrust Law Journal 73, 1-58.
164. Tandon, P. (1982). "Optimal patents with compulsory licensing". Journal of Political Economy 90 (3), 470-486.
165. Tao, Z., Wu, C. (1997). "On the organization of cooperative research and development: Theory and evidence". International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 (5), 573-596.
166. Trajtenberg, M. (2002). "Government support for commercial R&D: Lessons from the Israeli experience". In: Jaffe, A., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 79-134.
167. Van Dijk, T. (2000). "Licence contracts, future exchange clauses, and technological competition". European Economic Review 44 (8), 1431-1448.
168. Van Zeebroeck, N., Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2008). "Filing strategies and patent value". Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 6821.
169. Varian, H. (2005). "Copying and copyright". Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2), 121-138.
170. Vickers, J. (1986). "The evolution of market structure when there is a sequence of innovations". Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 1-12.
171. Von Graevenitz, G. (2007). Which reputations does a brand owner need? GESY Discussion Paper 215LMU, Munich, Germany.
172. Von Graevenitz, G., Wagner, S., Harhoff, D. (2008). Incidence and Growth of Patent Thickets-The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Complexity. Munich School of Management, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
173. Walsh, J., Arora, A., Cohen, W. (2003). "Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation". In: Cohen, W., Merrill, S. (Eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp. 285-340.
174. Walsh, J., Cho, C., Cohen, W. (2005). "View from the bench: Patents and material transfers". Science 309 (5743), 2002-2003.
175. Waterson, M. (1990). "The economics of product patents". American Economic Review 80 (4), 860-869.
176. Weston, R. (1998). "A comparative analysis of the doctrine of equivalents: Can European approaches solve an American dilemma". IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 39, 35-91.
177. Whinston, M. (1990). "Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion". American Economic Review 80 (4), 837-859.
178. Whinston, M. (2001). "Exclusivity and tying in U.S. v. Microsoft: What we know and don't know". Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 63-80.
179. Wright, B. (1983). "The economics of invention incentives: Patents, prizes, and research contracts". American Economic Review 73 (4), 691-707.