Using patents to mislead rivals

Canadian Journal of Economics

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 520-545

  Langinier, Corinne ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE; INNOVATION;

EID: 19944385292     PISSN: 00084085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00291.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aoki, R., and J.L. Hu (1999) 'Licensing versus litigation: effect of the legal system on incentive to innovate,' Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 8, 133-60
2. Chang, H. (1995) 'Patent scope, antitrust policy and cumulative innovation.' RAND Journal of Economics 26, 34-57
3. Choi, J.P. (2001) 'Technology transfer with moral hazard,' International Journal of Industrial Organization 19, 249-66
4. Cohen W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh (2000) 'Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not),' NBER Working Paper
5. Crampes, C., and C. Langinier (1998) 'Information disclosure in the renewal of patents,' Les Annales d'Economie et Statistique 49/50, 266-88
6. Crampes, C.(2002) 'Litigation and settlement in patent infringement cases,' RAND Journal of Economics 33, 228-74
7. Gallini, N. (2002) 'The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform,' Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 131-54
8. Gallini N., J. Putnam, and A. Tepperman (2001) 'Intellectual property rights and the propensity to patent,' Paper prepared for the International Conference on Intellectual Property and Innovation in the Knowledge-based Economy
9. Green, J.R., and S. Scotchmer (1995) 'On the division of profit in sequential innovation,' RAND Journal of Economics 26, 20-33
10. Grossman, G., and C. Shapiro (1986) 'Optimal dynamic R and D programs,' RAND Journal of Economics 17, 581-94
11. Grossman, G. (1987) 'Dynamic R and D competition,' Economic Journal 97, 372-97
12. Hall, B., and R.M. Ham Ziedonis (2001) 'The patent paradox revisited: determinants of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-95,' RAND Journal of Economics 32, 101-28
13. Hendricks, K., and R.P. McAfee (2003) 'Feints,' mimeo
14. Horstmann I., G.M. MacDonald, and A. Slivinski (1985) 'Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent,' Journal of Political Economy 93, 837-58
15. Lechter, A. (1995) Successful Patents and Patenting for Engineers and Scientists (New York: IEEE Press)
16. Matutes C., P. Regibeau, and K. Rockett (1996) 'Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations,' RAND Journal of Economics 27, 60-83
17. McKelvey, M.D. (1996) Evolutionary Innovations (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
18. Merger, R.P., and R.R. Nelson (1994) 'On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: the effect of patent scope decisions,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25, 1-24
19. O'Donoghue, T. (1998) 'A patentability requirement for sequential innovation,' RAND Journal of Economics 29, 654-79
20. O'Donoghue T., S. Scotchmer, and J.-J. Thisse (1998) 'Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress,' Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 7, 1-32
21. Pakes, A. (1986) 'Patents as options: some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks,' Econometrica 54, 755-84
22. Reinganum, J. (1989) 'The timing of innovation: Research, development and diffusion,' in Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
23. Scotchmer, S., and J. Green (1990) 'Novelty and disclosure in patent law,' RAND Journal of Economics 21, 131-46
24. Takalo, T., and V. Kanniainen (2000) 'Do patents slow down technological progress? Real options in research, patenting, and market introduction,' International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 1105-27
25. Van Dijk, T. (1996) 'Patent height and competition in product improvements,' Journal of Industrial Economics 44, 151-67