Preparing students for (inter-)action with activity theory

International Journal of Design

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 99-111

  Bødker, Susanne ^a   Klokmose, Clemens Nylandsted ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Design tools; Iterative design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871968636     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Benyon, D. (2010). Designing interactive systems: A comprehensive guide to HCI and interaction design (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
2. Bertelsen, O. (2000). Design artifacts: Towards a design-oriented epistemology. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1-2), 15-27.
3. Bertelsen, O., & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.). HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science (pp. 291-324). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
4. Beyer, H. (2010). User-centered agile methods. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 3(1), 1-71.
5. Bjerknes, G. (1992). Dialectical refection in information system development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 55-78.
6. Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bødker, S. (1999). Computer applications as mediators of design and use-a developmental perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.
8. Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20(4), 353-402.
9. Bødker, S., & Christiansen, E. (1997). Scenarios as springboards in design. In G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star, L. Gasser, & W. Turner (Eds.), Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide (pp. 217-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2011). The human-artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction, 26(4), 315-371.
11. Bødker, S., & Petersen, M. G. (2000). Design for learning in use. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 61-80.
12. Bødker, S., Christiansen, E., Nyvang, T., & Zander, P. O. (2012). Personas, people and participation - Challenges from the trenches of local government. In K. Halskov, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, Y. Lee, J. Simonsen, & K. Bødker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Participatory Design (Vol. 1, pp. 91-100). New York, NY: ACM press.
13. Bohøj, M., & Bødker, S. (2008). Meeting (in) the wild. In K. Tollmar, & B. Jönsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: ACM press.
14. Clemmensen, T., & Leisner, P. (2002), Community knowledge in an emerging online professional community: The interest of theory among Danish usability professionals. In K. Bødker, M. K. Pedersen, J. Nørbjerg, J. Simonsen, & M. T. Vendelø (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia. Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS.
15. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1991). Cardboard computers: Mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In J. Greenbaum, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work (pp.169-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expansion. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta Konsultit.
17. Engeström, Y. (2005). Knotworking to create collaborative intentionality capital in fuid organizational felds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 11, 307-336.
18. Floyd, C. (1984). A systematic look at prototyping. In R. Budde, K. Kuhlenkamp, L. Mathiassen, & H. Züllighoven (Eds.), Approaches to prototyping (pp. 1-18). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 11(5), 53-56.
20. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.) (1991). Design at work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In T. Binder, J. Gregory, & I. Wagner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Participatory Design (pp. 144-161). Palo Alto, CA: CPSR.
22. Hanington, B. H. (2010). Relevant and rigorous: Human-centered research and design education. Design Issues, 26(3), 18-26.
23. Jones, M. C., Floyd, I., & Twidale, M. B. (2008). Teaching design with personas, Magazine of Interaction Design & Architecture(s) Year II & III N. 3 & 4. pp. 75-82.
24. Kaptelinin, V. (1995). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Kaptelinin, V., & Bannon, L. J. (2012). Interaction design beyond the product: Creating technology-enhanced activity spaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 27(3), 277-309.
26. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 345-351.
28. Korn, M., Kawash, R., & Andersen, L. (2010). Surprise trips: A system to augment the natural experience of exploration. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 413-414). New York, NY: ACM press.
29. Korpela, M. (1994). Nigerian practice in computer systems development: A multidisciplinary theoretical framework, applied to health informatics. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology.
30. Kuutti, K. (1999). Activity theory, transformation of work, and information systems design. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. -L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 360-376). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lim, Y., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as flters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(2), 1-27.
32. Mackay, W. E., Ratzer, A. V., & Janecek, P. (2000). Video artifacts for design: Bridging the gap between abstraction and detail. In D. Boyarski, & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 72-82). New York, NY: ACM press.
33. Mathiassen, L. (1981). Systemudvikling og systemudviklingsmetode [Systems development and systems development method] DAIMI PB-136. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus.
34. Mogensen P. (1992). Towards a provotyping approach in systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 31-53.
35. Mwanza, D., & Bertelsen, O. W. (2003). Methods for applying activity theory to HCI design. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1045-1046). Washington, DC: IOS Press.
36. Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for HCI. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 87-143.
37. Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55-65.