The human-artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 315-371

  Bdker, Susanne ^a   Klokmose, Clemens Nylandsted ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b CETREA ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEVELS OF ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; THEORETICAL APPROACH; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

ECOLOGY;

EID: 84857147603     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2011.626709     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abowd, G., & Mynatt, B. (2000). Charting past, present and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 29-58.
2. Bærentsen, K. B. (1989). Mennesker ogmaskiner. InM.HedegaardV. R.Hansen, &S. Thyssen (Eds.), Et virksomt liv. Udforskning af virksomhedsteoriens praksis [Human Being and Machines] (pp. 142-187). Århus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
3. Bærentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: ACM Press.
4. Bardram, J. E., & Bertelsen O. W. (1995). Supporting the development of transparent interaction. In B. Blumenthal, Y. Gornostaev, & C. Unger (Eds.), EWHCI '95 selected papers. Springer lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 1015, pp. 79-90). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 126004010)
5. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2000). Instrumental interaction: An interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'2000). New York, NY: ACM Press.
6. Beguin, P. (2007). In search of a unit of analysis for designing instruments. Artifacts, 1, 12-16.
7. Beguin, P., & Clot, Y. (2004). Situated action in the development of activity. Activités, 1, 27-49.
8. Beguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173-190.
9. Bertelsen,O.W. (2000). Design artifacts: Towards a design-oriented epistemology. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 15-28.
10. Bertelsen, O., & Bødker, S. (2002). Interaction through multi-artifacts. In S. Bagnara, S. Pozzi, A. Rizzo, & P. Wright (Eds.), ECCE 11-Cognition, culture and design (pp. 103-111). Rome, Italy: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.
11. Bertelsen, O., & Bødker, S. (2003). Activity theory. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward an interdisciplinary science (pp. 291-324). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
12. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997). Contextual design: A customer-centered approach to systems designs. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface. A human activity approach to user interface design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Bødker, S. (1993). Historical analysis and conflicting perspectives-Contextualizing HCI. In L. Bass, J. Gornostaev, & C. Unger (Eds.), Human-computer interaction. 3rd International Conference, EWHCI '93, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 753, pp. 1-10). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
15. Bødker, S. (1996). Applying activity theory to video analysis: How to make sense of video data in HCI. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human computer interaction (pp. 147-174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Bødker, S., & Andersen, P. B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 353-402.
17. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2005). Affect: From information to interaction. In O. Bertelsen, N. O. Bouvin, P. G. Krogh, and M. Kyng (Eds.), Critical computing-Between sense and sensibility (pp. 59-68). New York, NY: ACM Press.
18. Bolter, J. D., & Gromala, D. (2003). Windows and mirrors: Interaction design, digital art, and the myth of transparency. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Bouvin, N. O., Brodersen, C., Bødker, S., Hansen, A., & Klokmose, C. N. (2006). A comparative study of map use. CHI '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Brodersen, C., Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2007a). Quality of learning in ubiquitous interaction. ECCE 2007 Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. Morrisville, NC: lulu Inc.
21. Brodersen, C., Bødker, S., & Klokmose, C. N. (2007b). Ubiquitous substitution. Interact 2007, Proceedings of 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
22. Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Becoming Wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. New York, NY: ACM Press.
23. Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W., & Rosson, M. B. (1991). The task artifact cycle. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 74-102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 10, 181-212. (Pubitemid 23599676)
25. Chalmers, M., & Galani, A. (2004). Seamful interweaving: Heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. New York, NY: ACM Press.
26. Cluts, M. M. (2003). The evolution of artifacts in cooperative work: Constructing meaning through activity. Proceedings of the 2003 InternationalACMSIGGROUPConference on Supporting Group Work. New York, NY: ACM Press.
27. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. D. (1986). Mind over machine-The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Glasgow, Scotland: Basil Blackwell.
29. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhuser.
30. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1984). A tool perspective on design of interactive computer support for skilled workers. In M. Sääksjä rvi (Ed.), Proceedings from the Seventh Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering (pp. 211-242). Helsinki: Helsinki Business School.
31. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1987). The Collective Resource Approach to Systems Design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and Democracy-A Scandinavian Challenge (pp. 17-58). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
32. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expansion. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta Konsultit.
33. Gal'perin, P. Y. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & Y. Maltzman (Eds.),Handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 249-273). New York,NY: Basic Books.
34. Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of CHI'91. New York, NY: ACM Press.
35. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions, XI.5, 53-56.
36. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Hartson, H. R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional accordances in interaction design. Behavior and Information Technology, 22, 315-338.
38. Hydén, L.-C. (1981). Psykologi och Materialism [Psychology and materialism]. In Introduktion till den materialistiska psykologin [Introduction toMaterialistPsychology]. Prisma, Stockholm.
39. Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., & Siegel, M. (2008). Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: How are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer interaction: Building Bridges. New York, NY: ACM Press.
40. Kaptelinin, V. (1996a). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B.Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness:Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Kaptelinin, V. (1996b). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B.Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness:Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
43. Klokmose, C. N., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2009). VIGO: Instrumental interaction in multisurface environments. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
44. Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality.Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
46. Lim, Y., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions in Computer-Human Interaction, 15, 1-27.
47. McCarthy, J., & Wright P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Mogensen, P. (1992). Towards a provotyping approach in systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 31-55.
49. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions, 6, 38-43.
50. Odom, W., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., & Blevis, E. (2009). Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. CHI '09: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
51. Oulasvirta, A. (2008). When users "do" the Ubicomp. interactions, 15, 6-9.
52. Palen, L., & Bødker, S. (2008). Don't get emotional, affect and emotion in human-computer interaction: From theory to applications (pp. 12-20). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
53. Polanyi, N. (1961). Knowing and being. Mind, New Series, 70, 458-470.
54. Rizzolatti,G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192. (Pubitemid 39050401)
55. Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual Review of Information, Science and Technology, 38, 87-143.
56. Sengers, P., & Gaver, W. W. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. Designing Interactive Systems Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
57. Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2, 55-65.
58. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. H. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Tomasello,M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., &Moll,H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
61. Turner, P., Turner, S., & Horton, J. (1999). From description to requirements: An activity theoretic perspective. Proceedings of the internationalACMSIGGROUPConference on Supporting Group Work. New York, NY: ACM Press.
62. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis. Towards safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
64. Winograd, T., & Flores, C. F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
65. Wynn, T. (1994). Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In K. R. Gibson & T. Ingold (Eds.) Tools, language and cognition in human evolution (pp. 389-406). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Zimmerman, J. (2009). Designing for the self: Making products that help people become the person they desire to be. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.