Local comprehensive plan quality and regional ecosystem protection: The case of the Jordan Lake watershed, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Land Use Policy

Volumn 31, Issue , 2013, Pages 450-459

  Berke, Philip ^a   Spurlock, Danielle ^a   Hess, George ^b   Band, Larry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Common pool resources; Ecosystems; Land use planning; Watershed

Indexed keywords

LAKE WATER; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; SPATIAL PLANNING; WATER RESOURCE; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHED;

JORDAN LAKE; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871924598     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2007, 1-29. 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
2. Baer W.C. General plan evaluation criteria: an approach to making better plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 1997, 63(3):329-344.
3. Basset E., Shandas V. Innovation and climate action planning: perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 76(4):435-450.
4. BenDor T., Doyle M. The planning for ecosystem service markets. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 70(1):59-72.
5. Berke P. State growth management and natural hazard risk reduction. Journal of the American Planning Association 1998, 64(1):76-87.
6. Berke P., French S. The influences of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1994, 13(4):237-250.
7. Berke P., Godschalk D., Kaiser E., Rodriguez D. Urban Land Use Planning 2006, University of Illinois Press, Chicago. 5th ed.
8. Berke P., Backhurst M., Laurian L., Crawford J., Day M., Ericksen N., Dixon J. What makes successful plan implementation? An evaluation of implementation practices of permit reviews in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B 2006, 33(4):581-600.
9. Berke P. Ecology and new directions for land use planning: barriers and opportunities to change. Lasting Landscapes: Reflection on the Role of Conservation Science in Land Use Planning 2007, 59-71. Environmental Law Institute Press, Washington, DC. R.I. Kihslinger, J. Wilkinson (Eds.).
10. Berke P., Godschalk D. Searching for the good plan: a meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature 2009, 2(3):227-240.
11. Berkes F. From community-based resource management to complex systems. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1):45. (online) http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/.
12. Betsill M. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment 2001, 6(4):393-406.
13. Brody S. Examining the effects of biodiversity on the ability of local plans to manage ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2003, 46(6):817-837.
14. Brody S., Highfield W., Carrasco V. Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern. Florida Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69:33-50.
15. Brody S., Highfield W.E., Thornton S. Planning at the urban fringe: an examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in Southern Florida. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 3:75-96.
16. Burby R.J., May P.J. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use 1997, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
17. Burby R. Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2006, 604(March):171-191.
18. Daley, D., Sharp, E., Bae, J., 2012. Understanding city engagement in community-focused sustainability initiatives. Paper presented at the Florida State University DeVoe L Moore Symposium - Local Benefits of Sustainability, Tallahassee, February 23-25, 2012.
19. Dalton L., Burby R. Mandates, plans, and planners. Journal of the American Planning Association. 1994, 60(4):151-168.
20. Deyle R., Chapin T., Baker The proof of planning is in the platting: an evaluation of Florida's hurricane exposure mitigation planning mandate. Journal of the American Planning Association 2008, 74(3):349-370.
21. Ericksen N., Berke P., Crawford J., Dixon J. Plan-making for Sustainability: The New Zealand Experience 2004, Ashgate Publishers, London, 350 pp.
22. Feiock R. Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 2007, 29(1):47-63.
23. Francis T., Whittaker K., Shandas V., Mills A., Graybill J. Incorporating science into the environmental policy process: a case study from Washington State. Ecology and Society 2004, 10(1). Article 35.
24. Kaiser E., Godschalk D., Chapin F.S. Urban Land Use Planning 1995, University of Illinois Press, Chicago. 4th ed.
25. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology 2004, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Hoch C. How plan mandates work: affordable housing in Illinois. Journal of the American planning Association 2007, 73(1):86-99.
27. Jordan Lake Cape Fear Basin Water Allocation Rules, 2010. (accessed 20.05.10). http://www.ncwater.org/Reports_and_Publications/Jordan_Lake_Cape_Fear_River_Basin/02JLA-R3HOreport.pdf.
28. Lubell M., Schneider M., Scholz J.T., Mete M. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science 2002, 46(1):148-163.
29. May P.J., Burby R.J., Ericksen N., Handmer J., Dixon J., Michaels S., Smith D.I. Environmental Management and Governance: Intergovernmental Approaches to Hazards and Sustainability 1996, Routledge Press, New York.
30. McElfish J. Nature Friendly Ordinances 2004, Environmental Law institute, Washington, DC.
31. Miles M., Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
33. Miller J., Groom M., Hess G., Steelman T., Stokes D., Thompson J., Bowman T., Fricke L., King B., Marquardt R. Biodiversity conservation in local planning. Conservation Biology 2008, 23(1):53-63.
34. Norton R.K. More and better planning: state-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association 2005, 71(1):55-71.
35. Norton R.K. Using content analysis to evaluate local master plans and zoning ocdes. Land Use Policy 2008, 28:432-454.
36. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York City.
37. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325:419-422.
38. Portney K. Sustainability in American Cities: a comprehensive look at what cities are doing and why. Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D.A. Mazmanian, M.E. Kraft (Eds.).
39. Sell J. Types of public goods and free-riding. Advances in Group Processes 1988, 119-140. JAI Press, Greenwhich, CT. E.J. Lawler, B. Markovsky (Eds.).
40. Sholz J., Schneider M., Lubell M., Midruta D., Edwards M. Building consensual institutions: networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 2003, 47:143-158.
41. Steelman T.A., Hess G.R. Effective protection of open space: does planning matter?. Environmental Management 2009, 44:93-104.
42. Stein B. Bridging the gap: incorporating science-based information into land use planning. Lasting Landscapes: Reflection on the Role of Conservation Science in Land Use Planning 2007, 52-58. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC. R. Kihslinger, J. Wilkinson (Eds.).
43. Westervelt J., BenDor T., Sexton J. A technique for rapidly forecasting regional urban growth. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2011, 38:61-81.