How plan mandates work: Affordable housing in Illinois

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 86-99

  Hoch, Charles ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; COMPLIANCE; PLANNING SYSTEM; SURVEY;

ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34250681809     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360708976138     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Berke, P., Dixon, J., & Ericksen, N. (1997). Coercive and cooperative intergovernmental mandates: A comparative analysis of Florida and New Zealand environmental plans. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(3), 451-468.
2. Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2002). Planning and indigenous people: Human rights and environmental protection in New Zealand. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2), 115-134.
3. Berke, P., & French, S. (1994). The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13(4), 237-250.
4. Bollens, S. A. (2003). In through the back door: Social equity and regional governance. Housing Policy Debate, 13(4), 631-657.
5. Briffault, R. (1988). Localism in State Constitutional Law. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 496(1), 117-127.
6. Brody, S., Godschalk, D., & Burby, R. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan-making: Six strategic choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245-65.
7. Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33-49.
8. Burby, R. J., & Dalton, L. (1994). Mandates, plans and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(4), 444-461.
9. Burby, R. J., & May, P. (1998). Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41(1), 95-110.
10. Burby, R. J., May, P., Berke, P., Dalton, L., French, S. & Kaiser, E. (1997). Making governments plan: State experiments in managing land use. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Calavita, N., Grimes, K., & Mallach, A. (1997). Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 109-142.
12. Carroll, R. D. (2001). Connecticut retrenches: A proposal to save the affordable housing appeals procedure. Yale Law Journal, 110(7), 1247-1286.
13. Chapter 40B Task Force. (2003). Findings and recommendations. Report to Governor Mitt Romney. Retrieved 11/25/05, from http:// www.state.ma.us/dhcd/Ch40Btf/
14. Connerly, C. E., & Muller, N. A. (1993). Evaluating housing elements in growth management comprehensive plans. In J. M. Stein (Ed.), Growth management: The planning challenge of the 1990s (pp. 185-199). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Connerly, C. E., & Smith, M. (1996). Developing a fair share housing policy for Florida. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 12(1), 63-109.
16. Connick, S., & Innes, J. (2003). Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2), 177-197.
17. Cowan, S. M. (2006). Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion and housing opportunity. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 295-313
18. Downs, A. (1973). Opening up the suburbs: An urban strategy for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 299-318.
20. Frug, G. (1999). City making: Building communities without building walls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Goetz, E. (2003). Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 3-16.
22. Goetz, E., Chapple, K., & Luckermann, B. (2004). Enabling exclusion: The retreat from regional fair share housing in the implementation of the Minnesota Land Use Planning Act. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 213-225.
23. Hoch, C. (2005). Suburban Response to the Illinois Affordable Housing and Planning Act. Great Cities Urban Data Visualization Lab, University of Illinois at Chicago.
24. Hughes, M., & Vadoren, P. M. (1990). Social policy through land reform: New Jersey's Mount Laurel controversy. Political Science Quarterly, 105 (1), 97-111.
25. Iglesias, T. (2003). Opening new doors for state housing regulation while localism persists. Oregon Law Review, 82, 439-516.
26. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2004). Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescription. Urban Studies, 41 (2), 261-283.
27. Innes, J. E. (1992). Group processes and the social construction of growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(4), 440-453.
28. Keating, W. D. (1994). The suburban racial dilemma. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29. Knaap, G., & Nelson, A. C. (1992). The regulated landscape: Lessons on state land use planning from Oregon. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
30. Krefetz, S. P. (2001). The impact and evolution of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Permit and Zoning Appeals Act: Thirty years of experience with state legislative efforts to overcome exclusionary zoning. Western New England Law Review, 22, 381-430.
31. Lewis, P. (2005). Can state review of local planning increase housing production? Housing Policy Debate, 16(2), 173-199.
32. Luberoff, D., & Altshuler, A. (1998). State planning in New Jersey. Cambridge, MA: Taubman Center for State and Local Government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
33. Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. May, P. J., & Burby, R. J. (1996). Coercive versus cooperative policies: Comparing intergovernmental mandate performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(2), 171-201.
35. McDonald, J. F., & McMillen, D. P. (2004). Determinants of suburban development controls: A Fischel expedition. Urban Studies, 41(2), 341-361.
36. Morgan, J. M. id (1995). Zoning for all: Using inclusionary zoning techniques to promote affordable housing. Emory Law Journal, 44(1), 359-395.
37. Nelson, A. C., Sanchez, T., & Dawkins, C. (2004). The effect of urban containment and mandatory housing elements on racial segregation in U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1990-2000. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(3), 339-350.
38. Norton, R. K. (2005). More and better local planning: State-mandated local planning in coastal North Carolina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(1), 55-71.
39. Payne, J. M. (2006). The paradox of progress: Three decades of the Mount Laurel doctrine. Journal of Planning History, 5(2), 126-147.
40. Pendall, R. (2001). Municipal plans, state mandates, and property rights: Lessons from Maine. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2):154-165.
41. Polikoff, A., (Ed.). (1997). Housing mobility: Promise or illusion? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
42. Sies, M. C. (1997). Paradise retained: An analysis of persistence in planned, exclusive suburbs, 1880-1980. Planning Perspectives, 12(2), 165-191.
43. Smith, M., O'Dell, W., & Ray, A. (2002). Housing programmes and the role of housing planners in Florida. Planning Practice & Research, 17(4), 429-436.
44. Stockman, P. (1992). Anti-snob zoning in Massachusetts: Assessing one attempt at opening the suburbs to affordable housing. Virginia Law Review, 78(2), 535-580.
45. Talen, E. (1997). Success, failure, and conformance: An alternative approach to planning evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(4), 573-587.