Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-50

  Brody, Samuel D ^a   Highfield, Wes ^a   Carrasco, Virginia ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Ecosystem management; GIS; Land use policies; Watershed planning

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; WATERSHEDS;

ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

URBAN PLANNING;

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL PLANNING; PLANNING SYSTEM;

FLORIDA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842479057     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beatley T. Preserving biodiversity: challenges for planners. APA J. 66(1):2000;5-20.
2. Benthrup G. Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west. Environ. Manage. 27(5):2001;739-748.
3. Berke P., Roenigk D., Kaiser E., Burby R. Enhancing plan quality: evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 39:1996;79-96.
4. Berke, P., Crawford, J., Dixon, J., Erickson, N., 1998. Do Co-operative Environmental Management Mandates Produce Good Plans? The New Zealand Experience. Department of City and Regional Planning, Chapel Hill, NC.
5. Blumenthal D., Jannink J.L. A classification of collaborative management methods. Conserv. Ecol. 4(2):2000;13. (URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/ art13 ).
6. Brody S.D. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 7(4):2003a;107-119.
7. Brody, S.D., 2003b. Implementing the principles of ecosystem management through land use planning. Popul. Environ., in press.
8. Brody, S.D., 2003c. Examining the effects of biodiversity on the ability of local plans to manage ecological systems. J. Environ. Plan. Manage., in press.
9. Brody, S.D., Carrasco, V., Highfield, W. Evaluating ecosystem management capabilities at the local level in Florida: a policy gap analysis using geographic information systems. Environ. Manage., in press.
10. Brown L.D. Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Hum. Relat. 44(8):1991;807-831.
11. Burby R., May P. Intergovernmental environmental planning: addressing the commitment conundrum. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 41(1):1998;95-110.
12. Christensen N., Bartuska A., Brown J., Carpenter S., D'Antonio C., Francis R., Franklin J., MacMahon J., Noss R., Parsons D., Petterson C., Turner M., Woodmansee R. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management. Ecol. Appl. 6(3):1996;665-691.
13. Clark W.C. Managing planet earth. Sci. Am. 261(3):1989;46-57.
14. Cortner, H., Moote, M., 1999. The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
15. Cox, J., Kautz, R., Maclaughlin, M., Gilbert, T., 1994. Closing the Gaps in Florida's Wildlife Habitat Conservation System. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
16. Daniels S., Lawrence R., Alig R. Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton Model to public participation strategy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16:1996;13-30.
17. Daniels S., Walker G. Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 16:1996;71-102.
18. Duerksen, C.D. Elliot, N., Thompson, E., Miller, J., 1997. Habitat Protection Planning: Where the Wild Things Are. APA Planning Advisory Report No. 470/471.
19. Emery F., Trist E. The causal texture of organizational environments. Hum. Relat. 18:1965;21-35.
20. Endter-Wada J., Blahna D., Krannich R., Brunson M. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl. 8(3):1998;891-904.
21. Fransson N., Garling T. Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurements, methods, and research findings. J. Environ. Psychol. 19:1999;369-382.
22. Grumbine E. What is ecosystem management? Conserv. Biol. 8(1):1994;27-38.
23. Guagano G.A., Markee N. Regional differences in the sociodemographic determinants of environmental concern. Popul. Environ. 17(2):1995;135-149.
24. Haeubner R. Ecosystem management and environmental policy in the United States: open window or closed door? Landsc. Urban Plan. 40:1998;221-233.
25. Howell S.E., Laska S.B. The changing face of the environmental coalition: a research note. Environ. Behav. 24:1992;134-144.
26. Innes J. Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 62:1996;460.
27. Kaiser, E.J., Godschalk, D.R., Chapin, S.F., 1995. Urban Land Use Planning, fourth ed. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
28. Kennedy, D.S., McAllister, S.T., Caile, W.H., Peckham, J.S., 2000. The New Watershed Source Book. Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder, CO.
29. Kirklin J. Protecting species and ecosystems within planning processes. Environ. Plan. 12(4):1995;6-13.
30. Light, S., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., 1995. The Everglades: evolution of management in a turbulent ecosystem. In: Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 3-34.
31. McGinnis M., Woolley J., Gamman J. Bioregional conflict resolution: rebuilding community in watershed planning and organizing. Environ. Manage. 24(1):1999;1-12.
32. Michaels S. Making collaborative watershed management work: the confluence of state and regional initiatives. Environ. Manage. 27(1):2001;27-35.
33. Miles, M., Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, second ed. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
34. Noss, R., Scott, M, 1997. Ecosystem protection and restoration: the core of ecosystem management. In: Boyce, M., Hanley, A. (Eds.), Ecosystem Management: Applications for Sustainable Forest and Wildlife Resources. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 239-264.
35. Randolph J., Bauer M. Improving environmental decision-making through collaborative methods. Policy Stud. Rev. 16:1999;169-191.
36. Raudsepp M. Some socio-demographic and socio-psychological predictors of environmentalism. Trames. 5(55/50):2001;355-367.
37. Scott D., Willits F.K. Environmental attitudes and behavior. Environ. Behav. 26(2):1994;239-261.
38. Selin S., Carr D. Modeling stakeholder perception of collaborative initiative effectiveness. Soc. Nat. Resour. 13:2000;735-745.
39. Szaro R., Sexton W., Malone C. The emergence of ecosystem management as a tool for meeting people's needs and sustaining ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plan. 40:1998;1-7.
40. Van Liere K.D., Dunlap R.E. Environmental concern-does it make a difference how it's measured? Environ. Behav. 13:1981;651-676.
41. Williams, J., Wood, C., Dombeck, M. (Eds.), 1997. Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
42. Wondolleck, J., Yaffee, S., 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.